mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Miscellaneous Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-11-02, 18:22   #529
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

18D216 Posts
Default

What? No response? Have we finally put this to bed?
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-04, 08:04   #530
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

2·1,303 Posts
Default

ahhh .. Jinx!
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-06, 06:45   #531
Don Blazys
 
Don Blazys's Avatar
 
Feb 2011

163 Posts
Default

Quoting "rogue":
Quote:
Let's take another look.
Before we do that,
do we now agree that my proof,
which can be found here:

httр://unsolvedрroblems.org/S14b.рdf

does not contain the expression (0/0)?

Don.
Don Blazys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-06, 07:19   #532
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

2·3·7·112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firejuggler View Post
ahhh .. Jinx!
Indeed!
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-06, 13:36   #533
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

11000110100102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Before we do that,
do we now agree that my proof
does not contain the expression (0/0)?
Assuming you did not modify your proof as I suggested, then no. You need to modify the preconditions of your proof to state that c != T. If you do that, then I will agree with your statement.
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-08, 04:51   #534
Don Blazys
 
Don Blazys's Avatar
 
Feb 2011

101000112 Posts
Default

Quoting "rogue":
Quote:
You need to modify the preconditions of your proof to state that c != T.


If c != T, then clearly, (T/T) != (c/c).

Don Blazys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-08, 05:08   #535
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Blazys View Post
If c != T, then clearly, (T/T) != (c/c).
Are you kidding me? I've stayed out of a thread I mostly don't understand, but that's clearly wrong. (T/T) = (c/c) unless T = 0 or c = 0. (I hope you're being sarcastic, but unfortunately, I'm really bad at it, especially on the blogotubes.)
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-08, 05:12   #536
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

2×47×101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Blazys View Post
If c != T, then clearly, (T/T) != (c/c).
If 2\ne3, then clearly (3/3) \ne (2/2).
Did I get this right?
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-08, 06:37   #537
Don Blazys
 
Don Blazys's Avatar
 
Feb 2011

163 Posts
Default

The foundations of mathematics are its axioms,

which are defined as "self evident truths".

Consider the "symmetric axiom of equality"

which states that if c=T, then T=c

and the "substitution axiom of equality"
which states that we can always substitute \left(\frac{c}{c}\right) for \left(\frac{T}{T}\right).

Well, if

\left(\frac{c}{c}\right)*c^3= \left(\frac{T}{T}\right)*c^3 where T=c

and the properties of logarithms allow the identity:

<br />
\left(\frac{T}{T}\right)*c^{3}=T*\left(\frac{c}{T}\right)^{\frac{\frac{3*\ln(c)}{\ln(T)}-1}{\frac{\ln(c)}{\ln(T)}-1}} where T\not=c

then clearly, those so called

"symmetric and substitution axioms of equality"

are neither self evident, nor always true.

Think about it. If we can't always substitute \left(\frac{c}{c}\right) for \left(\frac{T}{T}\right),
then we must conclude that \left(\frac{c}{c}\right)=\left(\frac{T}{T}\right) is not always true,
and that there do exist some identities in which \left(\frac{c}{c}\right)\not=\left(\frac{T}{T}\right)
which of course shakes the very foundations of mathematics.
Don Blazys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-08, 08:00   #538
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

5·1,931 Posts
Default

Don, something is really wrong with you: you forgot to say "don't you feel happy about it?" or something like that...
LaurV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-11-08, 08:58   #539
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

28AC16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Don, something is really wrong with you: you forgot to say "don't you feel happy about it?" or something like that...
I think he says "doesn't that make you happy?"
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do-it-yourself, crank, mersenne prediction thread. Uncwilly Miscellaneous Math 85 2017-12-10 16:03
non-standard sieve req Math 4 2011-12-06 04:17
Crank Emoticon Mini-Geek Forum Feedback 21 2007-03-06 19:21
Remove my thread from the Crank Forum amateurII Miscellaneous Math 40 2005-12-21 09:42
Standard Deviation Problem jinydu Puzzles 5 2004-01-10 02:12

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:15.


Mon Aug 2 10:15:09 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 4:44, 0 users, load averages: 0.99, 1.03, 1.15

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.