fond of a factor? Urn yourself to become remains - Page 53

axn · 2012-10-25, 08:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

I'm just curious. Is it considered redundant to enter the factors reported in this thread into the factor database at factordb.com ? I see many of them not in there.

I guess "pointless" would be correct way to put it. There is no point in entering the factor without the corresponding divisibility info. And factordb can't handle the Mxxx numbers themselves (too big). [It says the limit is 10 million digits, but for all intents and purposes, it can't handle things above a few hundred thousand digits]

gd_barnes · 2012-10-25, 09:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by axn

I guess "pointless" would be correct way to put it. There is no point in entering the factor without the corresponding divisibility info. And factordb can't handle the Mxxx numbers themselves (too big). [It says the limit is 10 million digits, but for all intents and purposes, it can't handle things above a few hundred thousand digits]

Um...it can accept factors of numbers up to 18 million digits right now! I entered several factors from here for ~2^60M-1. It will correctly tell you if the number is divisible or not.

What do you mean by "it can't handle things above..."? Effectively it is a storage facility for these large numbers. It's not intended to factor them except for very tiny factors.

Anyway...just my two cents.

axn · 2012-10-25, 10:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Um...it can accept factors of numbers up to 18 million digits right now! I entered several factors from here for ~2^60M-1. It will correctly tell you if the number is divisible or not.

I didn't test how high it would accept -- just went by the error message the system itself reported. But merely accepting a number is not 'handling' it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

What do you mean by "it can't handle things above..."? Effectively it is a storage facility for these large numbers. It's not intended to factor them except for very tiny factors.

So now you have 2 large numbers requiring megabytes of storage -- the original mersenne number and the cofactor (which will be of unknown status). Utter waste of space. FactorDB should be a storage facility of factors, not unfactorable numbers. These huge numbers take up space and other resources, with nothing to show for it.

Jwb52z · 2012-10-27, 07:24

P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=540000, B2=10260000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58476683 has a factor: 964450670265572517690165478951

99.606 bits.

Jwb52z · 2012-10-31, 13:26

P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=545000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58776209 has a factor: 142915865466782539771681

76.920 bits.

Stef42 · 2012-11-02, 10:29

When doing some ''Exponents that were poorly P-1 factored'' I found this:
P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=175000, B2=3675000, E=6.
M14350313 has a factor: 24631165036779102954314969 > 85 bits

Sadly, already LL tests done.

kracker · 2012-11-02, 23:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stef42

When doing some ''Exponents that were poorly P-1 factored'' I found this:
P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=175000, B2=3675000, E=6.
M14350313 has a factor: 24631165036779102954314969 > 85 bits

Sadly, already LL tests done.

I have a feeling it was done quite a while ago

Jwb52z · 2012-11-03, 02:50

P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=545000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58840811 has a factor: 100788975655846818476209

76.416 bits.

Jwb52z · 2012-11-03, 18:00

P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=545000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58849337 has a factor: 336520365826449387593167

78.155 bits.

Jwb52z · 2012-11-05, 02:01

P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=545000, B2=10355000.
UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58845587 has a factor: 45235574031873267829529

75.260 bits.

Uncwilly · 2012-11-13, 01:18

M332263333 has a factor: 7564203664111030934537
Assigned LL testing to "ANONYMOUS" on 2011-05-27

2012-11-02, 10:29	#578
Stef42 Feb 2012 the Netherlands 58₁₀ Posts	When doing some ''Exponents that were poorly P-1 factored'' I found this: P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=175000, B2=3675000, E=6. M14350313 has a factor: 24631165036779102954314969 > 85 bits Sadly, already LL tests done. Last fiddled with by Stef42 on 2012-11-02 at 10:34

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A new factor of F11?!	siegert81	FermatSearch	2	2018-01-24 04:35
A fond farewell	rogue	Lounge	10	2008-11-21 05:25
who can factor 10^100+27?	aaa120	Factoring	17	2008-11-13 19:23
New factor	fivemack	ElevenSmooth	4	2008-05-07 19:28
Shortest time to complete a 2^67 trial factor (no factor)	dsouza123	Software	12	2003-08-21 18:38

2012-10-27, 07:24	#576
Jwb52z Sep 2002 31F₁₆ Posts	P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=540000, B2=10260000. UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58476683 has a factor: 964450670265572517690165478951 99.606 bits.

2012-10-31, 13:26	#577
Jwb52z Sep 2002 799₁₀ Posts	P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=545000. UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58776209 has a factor: 142915865466782539771681 76.920 bits.

2012-11-03, 02:50	#580
Jwb52z Sep 2002 1100011111₂ Posts	P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=545000. UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58840811 has a factor: 100788975655846818476209 76.416 bits.

2012-11-03, 18:00	#581
Jwb52z Sep 2002 31F₁₆ Posts	P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=545000. UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58849337 has a factor: 336520365826449387593167 78.155 bits.

2012-11-05, 02:01	#582
Jwb52z Sep 2002 17·47 Posts	P-1 found a factor in stage #2, B1=545000, B2=10355000. UID: Jwb52z/Clay, M58845587 has a factor: 45235574031873267829529 75.260 bits.

2012-11-13, 01:18	#583
Uncwilly 6809 > 6502 """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 265A₁₆ Posts	M332263333 has a factor: 7564203664111030934537 Assigned LL testing to "ANONYMOUS" on 2011-05-27