![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"William"
May 2003
Near Grandkid
237510 Posts |
N-1 Proofs are not working. For example, this number should be provable. Also this one and this one.
While fixing it, maybe we can get this older problem fixed? Last fiddled with by wblipp on 2012-09-17 at 16:46 Reason: More Examples |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
F7116 Posts |
It appears Syd is still very busy.
I see this as very unfortunate. There are (currently) only four workers and one is dedicated to - Primality tests, N-1/N+1 tests. Which doesn't seem to work. No worker is processing the Primo verification queue and the worker for Status Unknown has limited itself to just below the current threshold. Only four workers and it appears two are doing nothing while other queues continue to build. How sad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Daniel Jackson"
May 2011
14285714285714285714
30116 Posts |
The cofactor of this number needs an N+1 proof: http://www.factordb.com/index.php?id...00000542801209
Output from DB: Code:
Primality testing 39032298869983378572165251709817898784122941782107130404355699668791809608361716288453210077407142417063406328932577136081823687995007860164492251306615896288859737799407184033891234625746937885535475345604467426030303562169259294951667862679970594724619504208828105984380587624680857390191907845313145439518452401 [N+1, Brillhart-Lehmer-Selfridge] |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| broken CPU bracket | wildrabbitt | Hardware | 2 | 2017-05-19 20:17 |
| Something broken? | schickel | Forum Feedback | 9 | 2011-08-16 04:43 |
| 84822 is broken | fivemack | Aliquot Sequences | 3 | 2011-01-18 17:59 |
| Prime95's backups broken? | abstractius | Software | 4 | 2007-12-18 02:31 |
| broken 1.6A | PageFault | Hardware | 5 | 2003-10-16 01:40 |