fond of a factor? Urn yourself to become remains - Page 48

chalsall · 2012-09-13, 23:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jwb52z

I really want to know how/why you'd know before I do, but you're being sort of snotty about things, so don't bother telling me.

Calm down.

Iff you have systems which automatically report their results then others might know the results before you do.

Iff you are in full control of the reporting you will be the first to know. But only iff you are observant.

Is it just me, or it the tension high?

Dubslow · 2012-09-13, 23:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

only iff you are observant.

The Redundancy Department of Redundancy called...

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Is it just me, or it the tension high?

My usual response is to ignore it when someone's being stupid. (Note that my post count in response to cheesehead's silliness is pretty low. (Also note that cheesehead makes a lot of not-silly posts, to be "politically correct".))

Jwb52z · 2012-09-14, 00:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Calm down.

Iff you have systems which automatically report their results then others might know the results before you do.

Iff you are in full control of the reporting you will be the first to know. But only iff you are observant.

Is it just me, or it the tension high?

How do you expect me, or anyone else, to react when you are basically saying you're the judge of all things pertaining to what is and is not valid or worthy enough or interesting enough or important enough to talk about in relation to factors, especially in a thread that's suppose to be FUN. The phrase "pissing in someone's cornflakes" comes to mind at times like this. I apologize if that's not allowed to be said on this forum. Ugh!

Dubslow · 2012-09-14, 00:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jwb52z

The phrase "pissing in someone's cornflakes" comes to mind at times like this. I apologize if that's not allowed to be said on this forum. Ugh!

Oh no, please continue. Many supermods have said much worse (not really chalsall though).

chalsall · 2012-09-14, 00:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jwb52z

How do you expect me, or anyone else, to react when you are basically saying you're the judge of all things pertaining to what is and is not valid or worthy enough or interesting enough or important enough to talk about in relation to factors, especially in a thread that's suppose to be FUN. The phrase "pissing in someone's cornflakes" comes to mind at times like this. I apologize if that's not allowed to be said on this forum. Ugh!

IMHO, you are overreacting.

Prime95 · 2012-09-14, 01:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

IMHO, you are overreacting.

I gotta side with Jwb52z here. It's a harmless thread, why get involved with negative comments?

IMO, your response would be much more appropriate if someone started a *new* thread saying "Look at the 90-bit factor I found with P-1!!!".

Jwb52z · 2012-09-14, 02:12

Thank you for the support, P95.

TheJudger · 2012-09-14, 18:23

A relative smooth P-1 factor above 2¹⁰⁰ found a couple of days ago:
P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=570000.
M56916199 has a factor: 192514199269068153431847285313537 (107.24 Bits; k = 1691207447541148640581632 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 7 * 11 * 227 * 1931 * 2141 * 9643 * 43891)

Dubslow · 2012-09-14, 18:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheJudger

A relative smooth P-1 factor above 2¹⁰⁰ found a couple of days ago:
P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=570000.
M56916199 has a factor: 192514199269068153431847285313537 (107.24 Bits; k = 1691207447541148640581632 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 7 * 11 * 227 * 1931 * 2141 * 9643 * 43891)

....wow

2^11. B1=43K and >100 bits.

ET_ · 2012-09-14, 22:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

....wow

2^11. B1=43K and >100 bits.

Even better... B1=10K, B2=44K...

Luigi

(Now that I think about it... which one would be faster?)

cheesehead · 2012-09-14, 23:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by ET_

Even better... B1=10K, B2=44K...

Luigi

(Now that I think about it... which one would be faster?)

That one.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
A new factor of F11?!	siegert81	FermatSearch	2	2018-01-24 04:35
A fond farewell	rogue	Lounge	10	2008-11-21 05:25
who can factor 10^100+27?	aaa120	Factoring	17	2008-11-13 19:23
New factor	fivemack	ElevenSmooth	4	2008-05-07 19:28
Shortest time to complete a 2^67 trial factor (no factor)	dsouza123	Software	12	2003-08-21 18:38

2012-09-14, 02:12	#524
Jwb52z Sep 2002 17×47 Posts	Thank you for the support, P95.

2012-09-14, 18:23	#525
TheJudger "Oliver" Mar 2005 Germany 11·101 Posts	A relative smooth P-1 factor above 2¹⁰⁰ found a couple of days ago: P-1 found a factor in stage #1, B1=570000. M56916199 has a factor: 192514199269068153431847285313537 (107.24 Bits; k = 1691207447541148640581632 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 3 * 3 * 3 * 7 * 11 * 227 * 1931 * 2141 * 9643 * 43891)