![]() |
|
|
#67 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
1C3516 Posts |
PrimeNet uses this thingy to sort its tables, it's stupidly easy to use... (but works, doesn't require a whole other page, etc...)
Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-08-07 at 18:55 Reason: s/it's/its/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
23×271 Posts |
Ability to "drop" computers? (like clones)
http://www.gpu72.com/account/computers/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
23×3×5×72 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
3×2,741 Posts |
Is there a way to create a new worktype that allows the user to choose a ratio of first time checks to double checks?
For example, say we want 5 first time checks and then a double check, repeatedly. We thing (?) this would allow your system to flag computers that do not have matching double check results as suspect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2·5·312 Posts |
@chalsall: On the Workers' Overall Progress report, could you insert the heading columns (no need links, same as in the bottom of the table) somewhere in the middle of the table? Say after position 50, and try to keep it inserted every 50 lines if the table grow? (like there will be one thousand users in the future, don't ask me to scroll up and down to see which column is P-1 results and which one is TF to 69 bits?) (well, by that time we may have more columns too, like TF to 147 bits, and it would be even more difficult to sail through so many numbers/columns/lines
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
23·271 Posts |
Hmm, it already may be implemented, but is there a way to show work done in GPU72 daily/weekly/monthly etc. for a specific category or all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
Note that the data on the farthest right will usually show a marked decline, as many of our workers only submit results once every week or so. When they do, the data is "smoothed" across the period of time that the assignments have been out. Does this provide what you're after? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA
23×271 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
On the page for getting assignments, in the box that says 'Sample assignments based on the above settings...', can you add a line there that gives a good estimate of the total days it will take to do the work selected based on the current average and the number of assignments to reserve? Since you already put 'xx.xxx GHz Days; x.xxx of your days.' there, I can use the # of assignments and multiply, but I'm being lazy ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Oct 2011
7·97 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AVX? (Other new features?) | Dubslow | Software | 6 | 2011-10-16 14:03 |
| A little request | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 8 | 2009-10-07 18:13 |
| Upcoming features | Xyzzy | Forum Feedback | 1 | 2007-11-26 18:57 |
| New features in Prime95 v22.9 | guido72 | Software | 4 | 2003-03-02 23:54 |
| Desired Features/Addins | Complex33 | Software | 5 | 2002-09-05 06:13 |