How should we compare GPUs to CPUs? - Page 6

Dubslow · 2012-01-04, 01:31

(Also a 570M will get significantly less throughput than a 570.)

ciic · 2012-07-15, 19:24

For the Website mersenne-aries (http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/mfaktc.php?sort=gpw) I would suggest alternate representatiomns of :

#1 GHd/d / W ==> GHdpd/W

#2 (GHd/d)² / W ==> GHdpd²/W

#3 GHz-days/day ==> GHdpd

(the 'p' stands for 'per', GH stands for GHz, actually)

Additionally, I would like to suggest to omit the colume: (GHd/d)² / W at all. 'Why', you might ask? Because why not (GHd/d)³ / W or (GHd/d)exp1000 / W , then??)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What percentage of CPUs/GPUs have done a double check?	Mark Rose	Data	4	2016-06-17 14:38
Anyone using GPUs to do DC, LL or P-1 work?	chalsall	GPU to 72	56	2014-04-24 02:36
GPUs impact on TF	petrw1	GPU Computing	0	2013-01-06 03:23
LMH Factoring on GPUs	Uncwilly	LMH > 100M	60	2012-05-15 08:37
Compare interim files with different start shifts?	zanmato	Software	12	2012-04-18 14:56

2012-01-04, 01:31	#56
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3×29×83 Posts	(Also a 570M will get significantly less throughput than a 570.)

2012-07-15, 19:24	#57
ciic May 2011 FR Germany - Berlin E₁₆ Posts	For the Website mersenne-aries (http://mersenne-aries.sili.net/mfaktc.php?sort=gpw) I would suggest alternate representatiomns of : #1 GHd/d / W ==> GHdpd/W #2 (GHd/d)² / W ==> GHdpd²/W #3 GHz-days/day ==> GHdpd (the 'p' stands for 'per', GH stands for GHz, actually) Additionally, I would like to suggest to omit the colume: (GHd/d)² / W at all. 'Why', you might ask? Because why not (GHd/d)³ / W or (GHd/d)exp1000 / W , then??)