![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·7·677 Posts |
You should have called it a magnificent list, or a stupendous list, or some other. Because comprehensive it was not.
Of course, the fault of taking it for a comprehensive list is entirely mine. ...Anyway, the rehashing that Syd apparently ran sometime earlier did take care of many problematic sequences. Now it remains to be seen if that took care of all broken sequences. Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2012-07-15 at 02:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
722110 Posts |
Yes, but during the first rebuild, my script was already putting enough strain on the DB, I didn't think asking for 9K elf files would be smart when it took a grand total of 3 sequence requests to put me over the hourly DB query limit. (Syd gave me a special exception because somebody would have to rebuild them all.)
Agreed. I tested one of those 22 on my list, and it appeared fine; I'll wait until the whole DB is rebuilt before checking the rest. How many errors did you spot that weren't on my list? |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
224068 Posts |
I didn't build a list, but off the top of my head 464800 was broken; its last line
Code:
2384 . 25899582916629778656548062011125093433610618647016152268530269754868529252835232508408965054758037757047163796929148 = 2^2 * 3 * 31 It is a weird kind of brokenness: in the DB, the 85th line appears to be correct again. (so the composite was corrupted after the sequence was loaded; apparently DB is hard-linking them - not computing sigma(n)-n). The other sequence was 410034 (this one was never mentioned on the forum). Same story, but much later - in lane 1820. The composite here was almost the same size, 505055137724945629. Both are now reported correctly from the database (the complete .elf). I'll check the other cases if I'll find them. (but my list only goes to low 600,000s. I am not going to strain the DB by retrieving the rest or all of them again.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·7·677 Posts |
Here's more:
Code:
608286 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 472162738223034181 fixed 464800 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 457427262952758559 fixed 410034 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 505055137724945629 fixed 363270 ... ERROR: @index 262: value != sigma - n now fixed in i262-1760 (was extending to a fake "i1132") 344424 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 426545107191872083 fixed 281952 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 442003797484530521 fixed 154920 ... ERROR: @index 1000: value != sigma - n now fixed in i1000-1055 113160 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 427860102068379707 fixed 97356 ... ERROR: factor not prime: 433707931115982869 fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
Sigh... I'm fairly sure I've found a new error.
Code:
Verifying elf 747720 Verifying index 60... ERROR: @index 60: value != sigma - n Code:
747720 117 1174 2^2 * 7 2^2 * 3 * 7 * 9041 * C111 Monday 2012-07-09 @ 08:07 UTC Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-07-16 at 14:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
11100001101012 Posts |
Well, all the previous errors from my list were fixed, except of course now there's one new error, in the post above.
Batalov will have to report about any possible errors with false "tails" that are larger than 110 digits. There are no such false tails of size < 110 except the one above. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·7·677 Posts |
I haven't retried to get all seqs since the database last cut me off with "too many queries". My lists end with 639354 (or else I would have found that merge).
All the n<=639354 errors were listed above. ______________ Interestingly it seems that database spends almost the same amount of queries for reporting just the last line, or 20. For 4788: "5,115 queries to generate this page" (for the last line!) "5,731 queries to generate this page" (last 20) (Could be optimized, wink-wink-nudge-nudge! I appreciate that the sequnce can change at any time so you wouldn't want to cache queries. Here's a cheap idea: every node could have a cached record for a node:i+100 if it exists or NULL; then if we'd need to trace A(4788), we would jump i0(=4788) -> i100 -> i200 -> ... -> i5000 -> i5001 and until the end one-by-one. 100 could be replaced by another suitable ad hoc value.) Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2012-07-22 at 01:36 Reason: a cheap idea to cut down on # of queries |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
Or perhaps render the HTML for all but the custom range option anytime a new line is added. That is to say, do cache the query, but make the cache update itself when new information becomes available, independent of people's requests.
@Batalov: How do you automate getting all the elves? When I tried with wget (the script I posted on the first page of this thread), I got a bunch of crap that wasn't an elf file. Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-07-22 at 02:01 Reason: s/queries/requests/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×7×677 Posts |
If you use wget correctly, you get a proper file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
1010000110112 Posts |
447432 and 888540 are broken in the FactorDB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
212210 Posts |
As reported in the reservation thread, there are apparently problems with some sequences again....Another one I just found was 337344. The last line shows up unfactored; if you click on the composite, it has a new status (at least it knows there's a problem....):
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Broken aliquot sequences | fivemack | FactorDB | 46 | 2021-02-21 10:46 |
| Graphs broken for aliquot sequences on factordb | fivemack | Aliquot Sequences | 4 | 2018-03-23 11:54 |
| bugreport: duplicate entries | maxal | FactorDB | 1 | 2017-11-14 15:38 |
| Broken aliquot sequences | schickel | FactorDB | 18 | 2013-06-12 16:09 |
| Wrong entries in database? | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2008-06-28 01:50 |