![]() |
|
|
#34 | |
|
May 2004
New York City
102128 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
289B16 Posts |
I for one am much relieved to have cmd, davar55, and science_man_88 on my ignore list because I got tired of reading their drivel. Others should do the same. If people stop responding to them, then their postings will drop off.
Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2011-02-01 at 05:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
25·257 Posts |
We happen to enjoy cmd's posts. While they clutter the forum somewhat, they are creative and interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
1039510 Posts |
What CMD posts is mostly random and doesn't correlate to anything that is being discussed. How can random be called creative?
Shall I type a bunch of random words or digits so that I can be called creative too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31×67 Posts |
His youtube links are annoying but I find it quite fun trying to work out what he's trying to get across. And it's usually easy to just scroll passed his posts.
In fact, I often end up laughing and quoting him to my wife. (Sorry cmd. )
Last fiddled with by Flatlander on 2011-02-01 at 21:38 Reason: passed/past |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
I think I might have brought this up before, but I couldn't find it back (though obviously I found this thread). I run into the 2 minute limit (lol) between posts more often than is probably healthy, however in the last week or so I noticed that I have yet (in the last week) to try and post more than once in a minute, i.e. I've not hit a the hypothetical one minute limit (lol again
). While reading this, I saw that it was in the past 1 minute... how has the spam been? (FWIW, I haven't really noticed much since I've been here, though that's probably a testament to the anti-spam employed here than anything else.) The reason I'm asking is because I saw someone else complaining about the 2 minute limit in the past week, so I decided to ask if it could be changed, but then I found this thread. So: are the spam blocks/spam levels sufficiently good/low enough to lower the time between posts to 60 seconds?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
67258 Posts |
You see zero spam because all posts by new users go into a moderation queue, and we get rid of spam that gets past the queue with a vengeance. In the past we have had spammers that would post into the queue as fast as the rate limit allowed, until they were banned, but that was quite a while ago by now.
Otherwise the rate limit on posts is to distinguish mersenneforum from AIM :) Last fiddled with by jasonp on 2012-05-01 at 00:10 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| random comments, random questions and thread titles made for Google | jasong | Lounge | 46 | 2017-05-09 12:32 |
| Custom water-cooling | LaurV | LaurV | 81 | 2015-09-18 20:20 |
| Custom Top Producers Report | TheMawn | PrimeNet | 2 | 2015-03-03 21:11 |
| Custom login? | Rodrigo | PrimeNet | 10 | 2014-02-22 16:53 |
| Custom Google search... | Xyzzy | Lounge | 24 | 2003-09-22 21:04 |