mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Factoring

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2012-03-17, 23:19   #298
jcrombie
 
jcrombie's Avatar
 
"Jonathan"
Jul 2010
In a tangled web...

21510 Posts
Default

In the curiosity department,

48131-1 c188 = p84.p105

Code:
 
p84= 666597940127567478926314250053215593484751546665734633414090507253770559719213333999
p105= 102043430077755943507387622730021855516367729839780613874018363499064959278025856799035207732985020302479
The largest triple quote/unquote?
jcrombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-19, 09:18   #299
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

259310 Posts
Default

Lucky hit on seq 11040:i9388 c149:

Code:
Using B1=43000000, B2=240490660426, polynomial Dickson(12), sigma=360494343
Step 1 took 237569ms
Step 2 took 72704ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 58188790498537295496280120496146152069818685197607499
Found probable prime factor of 53 digits: 58188790498537295496280120496146152069818685197607499
Composite cofactor 581029012516063493844714271258439220958080054298271434349094661167856372895231814321798430235827 has 96 digits
Remaining c96 splits as p46*p51 by gnfs. So, the largest factor was found by ECM
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-19, 16:57   #300
chris2be8
 
chris2be8's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

1000001011002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcrombie View Post
In the curiosity department,

48131-1 c188 = p84.p105

Code:
 
p84= 666597940127567478926314250053215593484751546665734633414090507253770559719213333999
p105= 102043430077755943507387622730021855516367729839780613874018363499064959278025856799035207732985020302479
The largest triple quote/unquote?
Are you working on the Brent tables? I am and would like to avoid duplicated effort.

Chris K
chris2be8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-19, 19:41   #301
jcrombie
 
jcrombie's Avatar
 
"Jonathan"
Jul 2010
In a tangled web...

21510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris2be8 View Post
Are you working on the Brent tables? I am and would like to avoid duplicated effort.

Chris K
Hi Chris,

I'm currently working on first holes from Brent's holes.txt file from about 3 years ago. I've made it up to 48 131- as you can see. Those are the only concentrated numbers
that I work on (and an occasional cunningham). (I also do ecm sweeps such as t20
for base 1001 - 9999 exponents up to 150). I send my updates to Prof Brent, but since
he has yet to absorb my last giant dump from Dec 5, I've been holding off on new updates to him). If you are working on first holes too, please update the factordb.com
as I always check there first before starting a new number and I send my factors there
as well. (My ecm sweep factors should be also available on my home web server
at http://myfactors.mooo.com which is semi-regularly updated). You can PM me any
numbers that you are working on so that I can avoid them.

Cheers,

Jonathan
jcrombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-26, 11:34   #302
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

2,593 Posts
Default

ECM strikes on sequence 842592:i8008 c161:
Code:
Using B1=110000000, B2=776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), sigma=625751920
Step 1 took 746426ms
Step 2 took 197356ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 8364584338015904739838273511475443354525819955383893373
Found probable prime factor of 55 digits: 8364584338015904739838273511475443354525819955383893373
Probable prime cofactor has 106 digits
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-03-30, 14:29   #303
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

3·2,141 Posts
Default Unusually good luck

In precisely one out of sixteen parallel ECM jobs, I got a hit. Note the run number

Code:
Run 224 out of 225:
Using B1=100000000, B2=776268975310, polynomial Dickson(30), sigma=2132373404
Step 1 took 964564ms
Step 2 took 273725ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 72884415673453771044511224741154120152573825983051
Found probable prime factor of 50 digits: 72884415673453771044511224741154120152573825983051
Probable prime cofactor 266087932759807516412782791665301365513151543357271524278499799994851545256483405953991561813263218272738563059 has 111 digits
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-12, 21:55   #304
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

C125 splits as P63*P63.
http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000218611640
The larger divided by the smaller is approximately 1.36.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-13, 08:57   #305
10metreh
 
10metreh's Avatar
 
Nov 2008

232210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
C125 splits as P63*P63.
http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000000218611640
The larger divided by the smaller is approximately 1.36.
Here's a properly nice split:
Code:
04/12/12 16:30:02 v1.31.1 @ ________, prp47 = 42396433854107117200014151850098395717424864963
04/12/12 16:30:02 v1.31.1 @ ________, prp47 = 42636915368713553443901733545681353700650075997

Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2012-04-13 at 09:06
10metreh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-21, 08:36   #306
unconnected
 
unconnected's Avatar
 
May 2009
Russia, Moscow

A2116 Posts
Default

From sequence 842592:i8010
Code:
Using B1=110000000, B2=776278396540, polynomial Dickson(30), sigma=3697488491
Step 1 took 974123ms
Step 2 took 256964ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 1815624236101952532630664834371236936165244754014489599
Found probable prime factor of 55 digits: 1815624236101952532630664834371236936165244754014489599
unconnected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-04-30, 09:03   #307
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

3·2,141 Posts
Default slightly surprising result

I just ran a C162 using 14e and 31-bit rather than 30-bit large primes, and am quite surprised how quickly it finished; more than 20% faster than an adjacent number done with 30-bit LP, and with only 162M relations of which 140M unique. The matrix is a little large (9.3M) but I can cope with ugly matrices; maybe I'm unusual in having similar resources for sieving and matrix, but the extra time running the matrix is less than half what's been saved in the sieving.

Will try a C160 with the larger large primes and see if I can find the crossover point.
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-05-13, 20:24   #308
lorgix
 
lorgix's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
Scandinavia

10011001112 Posts
Default

ECM stage1 hit: 229487392729284619870165192547258703516391

p42 of (7549^43-1)/((7549-1)*1979*160649*564586759413619*38929084316387597)

Code:
Group order:
[ <2, 4>, <3, 3>, <7, 1>, <283, 1>, <2063, 1>, <2213, 1>, <4211, 1>, <5531, 1>,
<8461, 1>, <15269, 1>, <18077, 1>, <18859, 1>, <57259, 1> ]
lorgix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gratuitous OPN factors wblipp Factoring 463 2019-05-30 07:19
Ungracious Factors Thread FactorEyes Factoring 2 2011-04-09 05:45
Missing factors at the 'Known Factors' page MatWur-S530113 PrimeNet 11 2009-01-21 19:08
JasonG's gratuitous C++ thread jasong Programming 16 2006-11-07 01:03
Gratuitous hardware-related banana thread GP2 Hardware 7 2003-11-24 06:13

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:43.


Mon Aug 2 15:43:25 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 10:12, 0 users, load averages: 2.11, 2.21, 2.35

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.