GPUers, please TF my exponents! - Page 12

James Heinrich · 2012-02-11, 12:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

And I'll take the last two:

no factor for M73000157 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000157 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000157 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000157 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]

no factor for M73000189 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000189 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000189 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000189 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]

kladner · 2012-02-11, 15:25

no factor for M73000003 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000003 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000003 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000003 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]

no factor for M73000061 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000061 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000061 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]
no factor for M73000061 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32]

30 minutes to go on M73000003.....back with an edit, shortly.

EDIT: Done!

Prime95 · 2012-02-11, 17:20

Thanks. I guess we'll have to do these 5 the hard way.

James Heinrich · 2012-02-11, 19:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prime95

Thanks. I guess we'll have to do these 5 the hard way.

Just curious: are you P-1'ing them, or just heading straight into L-L?

Prime95 · 2012-02-11, 22:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Heinrich

Just curious: are you P-1'ing them, or just heading straight into L-L?

They were already P-1'ed.

TObject · 2012-04-13, 00:16

Quick question:

I am about 75% through of the stage two P-1 on an exponent reserved for the first time LL. In parallel, I am taking the TF up a few levels. Assuming nether P-1 or TF find a factor, would it be ok for me to manually report the no-factor TF results, or will I lose my LL assignment?

Prime95 · 2012-04-13, 00:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by TObject

Quick question:

I am about 75% through of the stage two P-1 on an exponent reserved for the first time LL. In parallel, I am taking the TF up a few levels. Assuming nether P-1 or TF find a factor, would it be ok for me to manually report the no-factor TF results, or will I lose my LL assignment?

You can report the TF results.

TObject · 2012-04-13, 00:23

Most excellent. Thank you.

2012-02-11, 15:25	#123
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2×3×1,693 Posts	no factor for M73000003 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000003 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000003 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000003 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000061 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000061 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000061 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] no factor for M73000061 from 2^73 to 2^74 [mfaktc 0.18 barrett79_mul32] 30 minutes to go on M73000003.....back with an edit, shortly. EDIT: Done! Last fiddled with by kladner on 2012-02-11 at 16:09

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Exponents which don't need any more ECM	MatWur-S530113	PrimeNet	8	2016-10-12 08:00
77.9M exponents	GP2	Data	9	2016-08-21 14:10
ECM for exponents above 20,000,000	TObject	Data	25	2014-05-24 15:45
Unreserving exponents(these exponents haven't been done)	jasong	Marin's Mersenne-aries	7	2006-12-22 21:59
>10,000,000 exponents	ninjabill	PrimeNet	5	2006-02-07 17:28

2012-02-11, 17:20	#124
Prime95 P90 years forever! Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 17·487 Posts	Thanks. I guess we'll have to do these 5 the hard way.

2012-04-13, 00:16	#127
TObject Feb 2012 3⁴·5 Posts	Quick question: I am about 75% through of the stage two P-1 on an exponent reserved for the first time LL. In parallel, I am taking the TF up a few levels. Assuming nether P-1 or TF find a factor, would it be ok for me to manually report the no-factor TF results, or will I lose my LL assignment?

2012-04-13, 00:23	#129
TObject Feb 2012 3⁴×5 Posts	Most excellent. Thank you.