|
2012-03-23, 01:02
|
#1079 |
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
821 Posts |
Heh. More like "Turn your head and cough".
PowerShell is, in fact, rather powerful. But it focuses on system administration rather than general purpose programming. Last fiddled with by sdbardwick on 2012-03-23 at 01:03 Reason: Still more typso... |
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 03:33
|
#1080 |
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
Success for 1.69
Code:
Processing result: M( 26275721 )C, 0x8c6e4dc676cb816a, n = 1474560, CUDALucas v1.69 LL test successfully completes double-check of M26275721 |
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 07:18
|
#1081 | |
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
OT
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 13:31
|
#1082 |
|
Jun 2011
131 Posts |
Wow, look what I have started
 In the midst of it I hardly even noticed 1.69 success report. But to stay off topic: PowerShell is extremely powerful but it is not portable and requires a bit of different thinking. I looked into it but since I already have cygwin I was too lazy to get used to it. Anyway i did write couple of scrips that were easier to implement with it than with perl and cygwin. Andriy |
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 22:12
|
#1083 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
7·13·47 Posts |
I'd like to put together a CUAlucas performance comparison chart, similar to what I have for mfaktc. I'll need a wider variety of data samples than the single one I have from my own system. If anyone reading this thread could fire up CUDAlucas and PM/email me some iteration times for a variety of exponent sizes (at least 25M, 50M and 75M would be great). If possible, a variety of CUDAlucas versions would also be interesting. Naturally I'd also need to know what GPU you're using (and at what clock speed, if overclocked (whether factory or by yourself)).
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 23:48
|
#1084 | |
|
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
46316 Posts |
Quote:
I'll compile some data for you. It may take me a few days to get it all. On a bad note, I had a 1.69 mismatch today. I'm re-running the exponent to see if the original is bad, but it will need a P95 run anyway. Anyone want to run it? If not, I'll start P95 on it Saturday when my other P95 DC completes. M( 26229943 )C, 0x2bb14485101dd1__, n = 1474560, CUDALucas v1.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 23:52
|
#1085 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
How long would your run take?
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 23:55
|
#1086 | |
|
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-23, 23:58
|
#1087 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
1C3516 Posts |
Yeah, I think I can do it in a few days. I'll run it now.
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-24, 00:01
|
#1088 | |
|
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
Quote:
. I'll post my CuLu re-run results when it's done...Edit: I attatched the full run test (minus the last residue) Last fiddled with by flashjh on 2012-03-24 at 00:18 Reason: Add output |
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-24, 00:20
|
#1089 |
|
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
Wait, whoops...
When you reported the result, you lost the assignment key and it was reassigned. I'd rather not poach... Edit: Repeat for emphasis: If you want me to do a quick DC with Prime95, you must not submit the result to PrimeNet, so that we retain control of the exponent. (Yes, that does mean checking the residue for a match before submitting.) Sorry about that flash. Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-03-24 at 00:25 |
|
|
|
 |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Don't DC/LL them with CudaLucas | LaurV | Data | 131 | 2017-05-02 18:41 |
| CUDALucas / cuFFT Performance on CUDA 7 / 7.5 / 8 | Brain | GPU Computing | 13 | 2016-02-19 15:53 |
| CUDALucas: which binary to use? | Karl M Johnson | GPU Computing | 15 | 2015-10-13 04:44 |
| settings for cudaLucas | fairsky | GPU Computing | 11 | 2013-11-03 02:08 |
| Trying to run CUDALucas on Windows 8 CP | Rodrigo | GPU Computing | 12 | 2012-03-07 23:20 |
