![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
The max cache is 200 (it was at 50 a moment ago but I upped it to 200, since you're planning to do offline work
). The deadline is 72 hours, i.e. 3 days.(BTW: you can check the deadline on any (recent-version) PRPnet server by looking at the pending-tests list on the stats page. It shows "Age" and "Expired" columns for all pending tests.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
12228 Posts |
If anyone sees that sod Murphy, give him a black eye from me.
None of my results are showing up with that old client from any of 8 cores. That leaves me on the sideline in the Cheer Squad. Yayy. Go teaaam. Gimme a pom-pom. Last fiddled with by AMDave on 2012-02-20 at 23:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
65810 Posts |
I got 4.3.7 working on 1 box and it is reporting some work finally.
I tried all versions from 5.0.5 back to 4.3.7 on the laptops and they all fail on the T4500 chips for both 32 bit and 64 bit options. It's a bit disappointing. 3.1.7 still works on the T4500 cores, but now the server doesn't recognise the results. I suspect someone has got trigger happy with some compiler flags. :P A good incentive to go back to compiling my own clients again. It's nice when things 'just work'. So 4 out of 22 cores isn't a complete failure. PS - someone needs to watch what end-of-line characters they use. that 4.3.7 master ini file is awful when you look at it in Notepad. Much better in N++ though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
Quote:
I never use NotePad to edit text files on Windows for the reason you give amongst many others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
2×7×47 Posts |
rogue, my apologies. I know it's not you and the llr is bundled. I'ts generally agreed that the suspect here is the LLR binary and as I posted higher up, I tried others and they also failed. However the llr that was bundled with 3.1.7 prpnetclient and earlier did work. Sometime since then, someone upstream has likely used some flags that the T4500's don't support. Unfortunately the 3.1.7 client package is not posting the results successfully with the prpnet server, which is to be expected over time. I could try pulling that old llr forward into the 5.0.5 prpnetclient, but I'm over it and now the laptops are doing something else.
Re-the text file, glad to hear it. :) but someone messed up your master ini around the start and stop options in the 4.3.7 windows 7z on Lennart's downloads page. It is fine in the more recent versions. I mention it if anyone else like me has to go back and use that version then maybe Lennart can fix it and repackage the 7z file. It all works for everyone else. I'm just having a bad run. Ignore me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Feb 2012
1 Posts |
So, I'm new here to NPLB, however am excited to be participating in this rally :-)
Anyways, I just wanted to throw a question out there... my first WUs just completed and stats updated for the first hour I returned WUs, and it has a blank team name for me. I noticed this for a few other of my "teammates" as well. My .ini file properly has team name in it. Is there something else I am missing? |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Dec 2010
Ava, Missouri
4010 Posts |
Back to back primes!
Nice job PCZ. ![]() Neo AtP |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
1011001001002 Posts |
Quote:
Caravaggio KD7LRJ Mark_Doom Gary_Craig meiligo Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2012-02-21 at 21:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
2·7·47 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
That particular error you got, "Number sent to gwsetup is too large...", is, interestingly enough, the exact same error some fellows over at PrimeGrid were reporting with AMD Bulldozer machines on the latest development version of LLR--though in their case it was due to the latest development verison adding AVX support for a speed boost on Sandy Bridge and Bulldozer CPUs, but not (yet) properly taking into account differences in how Bulldozer implements AVX. I don't think I've ever heard of this error being thrown up by a pre-AVX machine, least of all with a non-development LLR build, but nonetheless it is what you're seeing. It would almost seem to indicate that somehow LLR doesn't know how to handle your CPUs, which is strange because a T4500 is a pretty standard laptop-spec Core 2 Duo, which should be a no-brainer for LLR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Jan 2006
deep in a while-loop
2×7×47 Posts |
Quote:
The team total will be corrected automatically by the database on the next refresh. ![]() @Max. Thanks. Yup. Used to work on same hardware. As above I suspect upstream LLR sources have made an error. Never mind. There is always next time. :) Last fiddled with by AMDave on 2012-02-21 at 06:30 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PRPnet rally Apr. 18th-25th | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 17 | 2012-04-26 11:54 |
| LLRnet/PRPnet rally Oct. 27th-Nov. 3rd | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 33 | 2010-12-24 19:16 |
| LLRnet/PRPnet rally June 4th-6th | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 61 | 2010-07-30 17:28 |
| Rally Jan. 23rd-25th | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2009-01-25 22:59 |
| LLRnet server rally port 300 May 23rd-25th | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 172 | 2008-06-04 19:21 |