GPU to 72 status... - Page 27

flashjh · 2012-01-13, 03:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashjh

I'll be using my Bulldozer system that can't run GPUs for P-1. It's been running ~12 P-1s a day, so I can pickup most of your slack. I have it on 2 LLs also, so if the P-1 cache starts to fill up, let me know and I'll transfer the LLs to another system or add a P-1 or two to my Phenom system.

Jerry

My P-1 system is down for bad memory (multiple system resets per day, sometimes every 45 minutes). With 16 DIMMs to test, it's going to take a day or two to figure out which one(s) when bad. Hopefully it's not the MB.

kladner · 2012-01-13, 04:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashjh

My P-1 system is down for bad memory (multiple system resets per day, sometimes every 45 minutes). With 16 DIMMs to test, it's going to take a day or two to figure out which one(s) when bad. Hopefully it's not the MB.

Ouch! That's very disappointing. I hope you find the culprit quickly (and can RMA it.)

flashjh · 2012-01-13, 05:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

And welcome to the team Flash!

Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

Ouch! That's very disappointing. I hope you find the culprit quickly (and can RMA it.)

If it's the memory, I'm still ok to RMA. If it's the MB I have to see what ASUS will do. It has a warranty, but I've never dealt with ASUS before.

bcp19 · 2012-01-13, 05:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by flashjh

Thanks

If it's the memory, I'm still ok to RMA. If it's the MB I have to see what ASUS will do. It has a warranty, but I've never dealt with ASUS before.

Which ASUS board do you have?

flashjh · 2012-01-13, 06:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp19

Which ASUS board do you have?

It's the KGPE-D16. Awesome board for dual G34, but no overclocking at all (which is expected, I guess)

LaurV · 2012-01-13, 07:00

Looking occasionally to the lifetime top500, I just found out that I am better even then the ghosts... :P

Click image for larger version

Name: 1-13-2012 14-01-34.jpg
Views: 89
Size: 10.1 KB
ID: 7554

KyleAskine · 2012-01-13, 13:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcp19

My 332M TF to ^80 just completed, 368 GHzD credit. So I 'lost' around 650 GHz on the 3 levels I did, allowing you to catch up a bit.

It's on!

LaurV · 2012-01-13, 16:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 13 Jan 12 at 20:18 Reason: Removed inappropriate joke.

So, you are policeman... or you either have no sense of humor...
After I spent half an hour to write it down... You could say, or send a PM. I don't believe I ever posted inappropriate things. I also don't believe you don't have jokes with policemen or you never heard one... You lost me here.

oswald · 2012-01-13, 17:43

If you TF to 80, can you split it up?

Say up to 77 on mfaktc copy 1, 78 on mfaktc copy 2, 79 on mfaktc copy 3 and 80 on mfaktc copy 4.

I was wanting to have four cores and four mfaktc threads running on one LLTF number.

Does this make sense?

James Heinrich · 2012-01-13, 17:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by oswald

If you TF to 80, can you split it up?
Say up to 77 on mfaktc copy 1, 78 on mfaktc copy 2, 79 on mfaktc copy 3 and 80 on mfaktc copy 4.

You can, but remember that each bit level takes twice as long as the previous one, so if it takes 1h to do 76-77, it'll take 8 hours for 79-80. What could work is doing (for example) 76-79 on one instance and 79-80 on a second instance; both will take roughly the same amount of effort (for example 32.2GHz-days for 76-79 vs 36.8GHz-days for 79-80). But, of course, if you find a 77-bit factor you will (probably) have wasted (part of) your 79-80 GPU time.

oswald · 2012-01-13, 17:56

James,
Thanks. I had not thought of wasted time after a found factor. I do believe I will not split the number up between cores.
Thanks,
Roy

2012-01-13, 07:00	#292
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 5×1,931 Posts	Looking occasionally to the lifetime top500, I just found out that I am better even then the ghosts... :P Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2012-01-13 at 13:18 Reason: Removed inappropriate joke.

2012-01-13, 17:43	#295
oswald Apr 2011 in vivo 3·5² Posts	If you TF to 80, can you split it up? Say up to 77 on mfaktc copy 1, 78 on mfaktc copy 2, 79 on mfaktc copy 3 and 80 on mfaktc copy 4. I was wanting to have four cores and four mfaktc threads running on one LLTF number. Does this make sense? Last fiddled with by oswald on 2012-01-13 at 17:49

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2012-01-13, 17:56	#297
oswald Apr 2011 in vivo 3·5² Posts	James, Thanks. I had not thought of wasted time after a found factor. I do believe I will not split the number up between cores. Thanks, Roy