mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > GPU to 72

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-01-03, 15:54   #34
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
I think he was referring to this post:



I wish we could Quote quotes!
easiest way go back to the quoted material within what you are quoting and re-quote it. of course you could also compose it by private messaging yourself the original quote and then replying to yourself with the other quote. etc.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-03, 17:49   #35
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

3·2,741 Posts
Default

Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
Quote:
9
Quote:
10
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-03, 18:06   #36
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·5·7·139 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
Well I just did a test and set my PC to get 90 days of DC work. One of the exponent I got was only factored to 68 bit while 4 were only factored to 67. So one as to wonder if GPU272 ever got those "preferred" exponent?

[snip]

So did we ever get one of those Preferred exponent? I don't remember ever seeing the 24M or 44M range on the available report.
I just did a query against the database, and no. G72 has never seen an exponent below 25M, nor between 40M and 45M.

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
GPU272 Feature request:

1) Can we have a similar page as on Primenet to view what are the current threshold for the system?

Here are some ideas:

Number of DC reserved
Number of LL reserved
Max Number of P-1 reserved where N bit >= X (currently i think its 250 at 72 bit)
Any other system rules we don't get to see (are we still releasing 71 bit exponent > 55M early?)
Sure, I could put together such a page. But basically it's what's been discussed here already: 50 DC and LL candidates are reserved. 250 P-1 candidates are reserved (although we have so much P-1 fire power now that the cache is never full).

Also, yes... We are currently releasing candidates above 55M which have been TFed to 71 or above.

(Please note that because of a "Stupid Programmer Error", for the last 36 hours G72 was not returning all the candidates it should have been. This was why the "Retained" count was above 50. This has been fixed (and the programmer beaten about the head and shoulders...).)

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
2) Also a released exponent map would be awesome. Something like the available report but for exponent released and their bit level.
I already have that report in the "Administration" area (along with a "Pledged" report) which I was planning on making public shortly.
chalsall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-03, 19:03   #37
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

16010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
Well I just did a test and set my PC to get 90 days of DC work. One of the exponent I got was only factored to 68 bit while 4 were only factored to 67. So one as to wonder if GPU272 ever got those "preferred" exponent?
Well, as a one of, I went ahead and grabbed the 15 exponents TF to 67 and the 15 TF to 68 in the 25M range.

I sure don't miss all that manual labor we used to do before GPU272!

Last fiddled with by diamonddave on 2012-01-03 at 19:05
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-04, 03:13   #38
bcp19
 
bcp19's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

7×97 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
I just did a query against the database, and no. G72 has never seen an exponent below 25M, nor between 40M and 45M.



Sure, I could put together such a page. But basically it's what's been discussed here already: 50 DC and LL candidates are reserved. 250 P-1 candidates are reserved (although we have so much P-1 fire power now that the cache is never full).

Also, yes... We are currently releasing candidates above 55M which have been TFed to 71 or above.

(Please note that because of a "Stupid Programmer Error", for the last 36 hours G72 was not returning all the candidates it should have been. This was why the "Retained" count was above 50. This has been fixed (and the programmer beaten about the head and shoulders...).)



I already have that report in the "Administration" area (along with a "Pledged" report) which I was planning on making public shortly.
Maybe you need to up your reserve of P-1 to 300 or 400 since all of them are goign so fast.
bcp19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-06, 03:42   #39
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

16010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
I just did a query against the database, and no. G72 has never seen an exponent below 25M, nor between 40M and 45M.
I guess George took notice of this thread (or just dumb luck).

They just started to appear! I got 8 42M and 2 43M.

I wonder if we will get any < 26M.

After further look into the exponent, they look like poorly P-1 candidates (my project for 2012!) bring them on, I was actually TFing to 71 a bunch of those eyesore on the PrimeNet assignment report, before I get to do the P-1 on them.

Last fiddled with by diamonddave on 2012-01-06 at 03:55
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-06, 03:57   #40
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

124416 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
I wonder if we will get any < 26M.
Lots here right now (opver 200): http://www.mersenne.org/primenet/

But if they are already factored to 69 will spidey ignore them?
petrw1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-06, 07:54   #41
ckdo
 
ckdo's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany

10228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
I guess George took notice of this thread (or just dumb luck).

They just started to appear! I got 8 42M and 2 43M.
Double Checks, of course, like I got, I assume.
ckdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-06, 11:03   #42
davieddy
 
davieddy's Avatar
 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England

2·3·13·83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckdo View Post
Double Checks, of course, like I got, I assume.
40M DCs are really urgently needed.
Almost as useful as a chocolate teapot, or a 66 bit factor of 10^100.

David
davieddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-06, 11:08   #43
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

16010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckdo View Post
Double Checks, of course, like I got, I assume.
Any reason why they appear in the LL table and not the DC table?

Also, lets not factor those to 72 please, with only 1 LL saved and low exponent it's even less ROI then 45M to 72.
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-06, 12:18   #44
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

101000002 Posts
Default

Those new exponent aren't tracked properly.

I submitted a batch of result, but all those < 45M aren't appearing in my Completed report.
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Call for GPU Workers to help at the "LL Wavefront" chalsall GPU Computing 24 2015-07-11 17:48
Went from 8 workers to 4 workers on v26.6 upgrade dmoran Software 13 2011-05-23 12:36
CPU is not reliable enough to get *blah* willmore Software 2 2009-01-15 19:33
Are commercial PC's becoming more reliable? retina Hardware 22 2008-06-17 01:04
Most Reliable Memory SLalley Hardware 10 2004-04-22 21:39

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:16.


Fri Jul 16 14:16:03 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 12:03, 2 users, load averages: 1.73, 1.79, 1.75

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.