Possible extention to the "GPU to 72 Tool" project? - Page 29

LaurV · 2011-11-30, 05:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

Ok, now a small suggestion:

@chalsall: I saw you took this suggestion on the hard way, you just deleted the two rows at all from the report

Dubslow · 2011-11-30, 06:22

Also within two weeks I'll need an LL column in the Worker's Progress window :)

LaurV · 2011-11-30, 06:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

Also within two weeks I'll need an LL column in the Worker's Progress window :)

As I understood, that is already implemented, but waiting for some data (same as it happened with the DC column).

Dubslow · 2011-11-30, 06:41

Oh. I'll be happy to oblige. Shall we start a 'pot'?

LaurV · 2011-11-30, 07:10

"Pot"?? All resources busy for the next 40 hours or so... Primenet LL-front assignment (one expo) on one card - about 38 hours ETA, and GPU-2-72 (two expos) DC assignment on second card (ETA about 40 hours together). But if you like, I would stop the current LL when I arrive home this evening and take one LL assignment from GPU272.

Generally I avoided to take "first LL" work from GPU-2-72, because TF-ing at LL front seems more profitable then LL-ing, about 3 to 5 times more profitable, according with the overall progress table. One can find a factor every two-three days, and saves 2 LL-s which would take 10-14 days.

Contrary to TF-ing at DC-front, which seems less profitable then DC-ing, about half of the benefit, as I said in my former posts in this thread, and it can be seen in the table, now after we collected enough data. One can find a DC-front factor every two days, but he would need one day to DC the exponent and get rid of it. Of course, finding factors is cool...

But I would really suggest TF-only for LL-front, and DC-only for DC-front, for the time being. And that is what I am doing. No TF at DC front, and no LL at LL-front. This to be clear :D

Until the overall tables would look differently... Just my tuppence.

Dubslow · 2011-11-30, 07:33

Oops. Turns out my first GPU272 exponents won't be done until December... Unless I put them ahead...
Edit: I've now done that, if only to start two exponents at exactly the same time to see which one completes first, and how far apart they are when they finish. It'll be almost exactly 15 days.
(@LaurV: I do do TF work, on my GPU. I just happen to have cores left over for P95, which primarily run LL tests.)

lycorn · 2011-11-30, 19:34

I have just checked the Worker´s Progress table, and noted that GPU to 72 has become a Holy Project: God Himself did care to join!

(prime95 appears on the list of workers). But so far God didn´t create anything... no results showing up yet.

ET_ · 2011-11-30, 19:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycorn

I have just checked the Worker´s Progress table, and noted that GPU to 72 has become a Holy Project: God Himself did care to join!

(prime95 appears on the list of workers). But so far God didn´t create anything... no results showing up yet.

Gee, there is also the Invisible Man!

Luigi

lycorn · 2011-11-30, 20:40

Hmm.. just became visible (or else vanished from the list).

petrw1 · 2011-11-30, 22:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by lycorn

I have just checked the Worker´s Progress table, and noted that GPU to 72 has become a Holy Project: God Himself did care to join!

(prime95 appears on the list of workers). But so far God didn´t create anything... no results showing up yet.

Could be LL or DC

LaurV · 2011-12-11, 05:16

@chalsall: How about a "total" line for the two tables with "cost per factor found?" Like add all in the "Run" and "F" columns, and use the same formula as in the table to compute the gigs-days. A general total for each table and a general total for all the project would be welcomed too, however this will imply a third small table (with two rows and a total row) beside/under the two tables already there, or, if you don't like the idea with the third table, then a new column on the right of each of the two tables would suffice too, and sum them horizontally. Then the lower-right cells of the tables will show the general total.

2011-11-30, 07:33	#314
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3·29·83 Posts	Oops. Turns out my first GPU272 exponents won't be done until December... Unless I put them ahead... Edit: I've now done that, if only to start two exponents at exactly the same time to see which one completes first, and how far apart they are when they finish. It'll be almost exactly 15 days. (@LaurV: I do do TF work, on my GPU. I just happen to have cores left over for P95, which primarily run LL tests.) Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2011-11-30 at 07:40

2011-12-11, 05:16	#319
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 9654₁₀ Posts	@chalsall: How about a "total" line for the two tables with "cost per factor found?" Like add all in the "Run" and "F" columns, and use the same formula as in the table to compute the gigs-days. A general total for each table and a general total for all the project would be welcomed too, however this will imply a third small table (with two rows and a total row) beside/under the two tables already there, or, if you don't like the idea with the third table, then a new column on the right of each of the two tables would suffice too, and sum them horizontally. Then the lower-right cells of the tables will show the general total. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2011-12-11 at 05:18

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion"	MooMoo2	Other Chess Games	5	2016-10-22 01:55
Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!"	wildrabbitt	Miscellaneous Math	11	2015-03-06 08:17
Collaborative mathematics: the "polymath" project	Dougy	Math	11	2009-10-21 10:04
Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier?	nitai1999	Software	7	2004-08-26 18:12

2011-11-30, 06:22	#310
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3·29·83 Posts	Also within two weeks I'll need an LL column in the Worker's Progress window :)

2011-11-30, 06:41	#312
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3·29·83 Posts	Oh. I'll be happy to oblige. Shall we start a 'pot'?

2011-11-30, 07:10	#313
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 2×3×1,609 Posts	"Pot"?? All resources busy for the next 40 hours or so... Primenet LL-front assignment (one expo) on one card - about 38 hours ETA, and GPU-2-72 (two expos) DC assignment on second card (ETA about 40 hours together). But if you like, I would stop the current LL when I arrive home this evening and take one LL assignment from GPU272. Generally I avoided to take "first LL" work from GPU-2-72, because TF-ing at LL front seems more profitable then LL-ing, about 3 to 5 times more profitable, according with the overall progress table. One can find a factor every two-three days, and saves 2 LL-s which would take 10-14 days. Contrary to TF-ing at DC-front, which seems less profitable then DC-ing, about half of the benefit, as I said in my former posts in this thread, and it can be seen in the table, now after we collected enough data. One can find a DC-front factor every two days, but he would need one day to DC the exponent and get rid of it. Of course, finding factors is cool... But I would really suggest TF-only for LL-front, and DC-only for DC-front, for the time being. And that is what I am doing. No TF at DC front, and no LL at LL-front. This to be clear :D Until the overall tables would look differently... Just my tuppence.

2011-11-30, 19:34	#315
lycorn "GIMFS" Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 3×491 Posts	I have just checked the Worker´s Progress table, and noted that GPU to 72 has become a Holy Project: God Himself did care to join! (prime95 appears on the list of workers). But so far God didn´t create anything... no results showing up yet.

2011-11-30, 20:40	#317
lycorn "GIMFS" Sep 2002 Oeiras, Portugal 3×491 Posts	Hmm.. just became visible (or else vanished from the list).