GPU to 72 status... - Page 6

chalsall · 2011-12-09, 18:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by kladner

It's interesting that there appear to be one or more heavy hitters in the 72 and above range who report every other day. I'm guessing it's just one, since the "more than" case might imply synchronization. I'm by no means a statistician,but the pattern seems very dramatic, at least at the moment.

Yeah... it makes the Monthly LL chart rather hell to read at the moment, but I'm not going to complain about all the work being provided...

(And you're correct: it's primarily one of our largest contributors.)

BTW, on this new page, simply click on the charts to switch between Weekly and Monthly views. This is accessible from the menus (subs of the OSP), or by clicking on the chart on the Overall System Progress page.

KyleAskine · 2011-12-09, 19:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Yeah... it makes the Monthly LL chart rather hell to read at the moment, but I'm not going to complain about all the work being provided...

(And you're correct: it's primarily one of our largest contributors.)

BTW, on this new page, simply click on the charts to switch between Weekly and Monthly views. This is accessible from the menus (subs of the OSP), or by clicking on the chart on the Overall System Progress page.

A few months ago someone asked why PrimeNet would almost double every few days. I think xyzzy said he only uploaded results every couple days, and was big enough to do that.

kjaget · 2011-12-09, 21:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Yeah... it makes the Monthly LL chart rather hell to read at the moment, but I'm not going to complain about all the work being provided...

(And you're correct: it's primarily one of our largest contributors.)

Nothing a run through some sort of low-pass filter won't fix, if you're looking for more feature requests.

chalsall · 2011-12-10, 05:00

Just a quick note... Some of you might find the (temporary) links from the Workers' Progress page interesting...

And, yup, it's mostly Xyzzy who's causing the Sawtooth pattern on the LL Range graph....

LaurV · 2011-12-10, 05:25

In the range of 40M to 50M there are 128k expos TFed to 68 bits only. On the range 45M to 56M where GPU272 has its den, there are 41k of them too. Actually, they are all in 45M to 48M range, as there is none left to 68 for higher expos, but that's not the point. The point is why GPU272 can't get its claw on ANY of these exponents???

I am trying since yesterday evening to grab some TF work at the LL-front, but I only want to TF from 68 (or lower, but this is not possible, as there are no expos with lower TF limit in the range) up to 69. That is one bit only, and the reason is I am testing some GPU settings and I want the results to come out fast, but I don't want to waste the time re-doing known results (my experiments could influence the speed, but not the correctness of the results, so I don't want to re-do known results to see if I get the same things. In fact, I am interested in some "best compromise" in running mfaktc/cudalucas together with some graphic-intensive application as AutoCad or AltiumProtel - of course you guessed I did not invest that huge amount of money in my computer only to crunch prime numbers :P).

So, we are talking about at least 40000 exponents, if not 128000 of them. The search on GPU272 "get new assignment" page always comes out empty handed.

edit: I use the optional range as default, 0-55M, select TF to 69. It can't fulfill even the request for a SINGLE exponent. It always responds with "sorry, no available exponents which match your criteria". C'mon! Get your claw on few of them.

kladner · 2011-12-10, 06:21

@ LaurV: Those are the sort of assignments I look for, though I am happy starting out from 69.

LaurV · 2011-12-10, 06:32

Of course, that is what I have to do, too. I was just wondering....

nucleon · 2011-12-10, 07:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubslow

(nucleon? xyzzy? well actually, that's why GPU272 has made it so high in <1 month...)

If I was my own team, I'd be ranked 32 in 24hrs (ish), 14 in a week (ish), 5 in a month (ish), ranked 1 in about 150days (ish).

These GPUs are thundering a long. No wonder if you look at things like top500.org you see GPUs in the higher ranked clusters.

-- Craig

garo · 2011-12-10, 07:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaurV

Of course, that is what I have to do, too. I was just wondering....

Most of those exponents already have one LL test done so are not grabbed.

davieddy · 2011-12-10, 21:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by garo

Most of those exponents already have one LL test done so are not grabbed.

Dubslow · 2011-12-10, 23:31

Question and comment, in reverse order:
In the Cost per Factor reports, there are infinities shown in some of the GHz Days cells, even when GHz Days should be very low, less than 100.

Do exponents either assigned for LL-test or completed LL-test count as 'Returned to PrimeNet'?

2011-12-10, 05:00	#59
chalsall If I May "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 2602₁₆ Posts	Workers' progress graphs... Just a quick note... Some of you might find the (temporary) links from the Workers' Progress page interesting... And, yup, it's mostly Xyzzy who's causing the Sawtooth pattern on the LL Range graph.... Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2012-07-27 at 13:48

2011-12-10, 05:25	#60
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 9610₁₀ Posts	In the range of 40M to 50M there are 128k expos TFed to 68 bits only. On the range 45M to 56M where GPU272 has its den, there are 41k of them too. Actually, they are all in 45M to 48M range, as there is none left to 68 for higher expos, but that's not the point. The point is why GPU272 can't get its claw on ANY of these exponents??? I am trying since yesterday evening to grab some TF work at the LL-front, but I only want to TF from 68 (or lower, but this is not possible, as there are no expos with lower TF limit in the range) up to 69. That is one bit only, and the reason is I am testing some GPU settings and I want the results to come out fast, but I don't want to waste the time re-doing known results (my experiments could influence the speed, but not the correctness of the results, so I don't want to re-do known results to see if I get the same things. In fact, I am interested in some "best compromise" in running mfaktc/cudalucas together with some graphic-intensive application as AutoCad or AltiumProtel - of course you guessed I did not invest that huge amount of money in my computer only to crunch prime numbers :P). So, we are talking about at least 40000 exponents, if not 128000 of them. The search on GPU272 "get new assignment" page always comes out empty handed. edit: I use the optional range as default, 0-55M, select TF to 69. It can't fulfill even the request for a SINGLE exponent. It always responds with "sorry, no available exponents which match your criteria". C'mon! Get your claw on few of them. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2011-12-10 at 05:41

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Status	Primeinator	Operation Billion Digits	5	2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	27	2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status	Uncwilly	Operation Billion Digits	22	2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status	paulunderwood	3*2^n-1 Search	2	2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M	1997rj7	Lone Mersenne Hunters	25	2004-06-18 16:46

2011-12-10, 06:21	#61
kladner "Kieren" Jul 2011 In My Own Galaxy! 2×3×1,693 Posts	@ LaurV: Those are the sort of assignments I look for, though I am happy starting out from 69.

2011-12-10, 06:32	#62
LaurV Romulan Interpreter Jun 2011 Thailand 2×5×31² Posts	Of course, that is what I have to do, too. I was just wondering....

2011-12-10, 23:31	#66
Dubslow Basketry That Evening! "Bunslow the Bold" Jun 2011 40<A<43 -89<O<-88 3×29×83 Posts	Question and comment, in reverse order: In the Cost per Factor reports, there are infinities shown in some of the GHz Days cells, even when GHz Days should be very low, less than 100. Do exponents either assigned for LL-test or completed LL-test count as 'Returned to PrimeNet'?