Individual-k reservations k=300-400 n=1M-3M - Page 11

gd_barnes · 2011-10-24, 06:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by gamer007

k=309 tested until n=1.24M
k=319 tested until n=1.27M

You are past your original reservation of n=1M-1.2M. Do you know what range you plan to test?

gamer007 · 2011-10-24, 06:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

You are past your original reservation of n=1M-1.2M. Do you know what range you plan to test?

I'll finish at n=1.3M for both k's.

BiBi · 2011-10-24, 20:36

Can I reserve k=309 for up to 2M?

gd_barnes · 2011-10-25, 05:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiBi

Can I reserve k=309 for up to 2M?

Yes you can. Gamer007 has it reserved up to n=1.3M but you can reserve it for n=1.3M-2M.

Let us know if that sounds good to you and if so, one of the admins will send the file to you.

Gary

BiBi · 2011-10-25, 05:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Yes you can. Gamer007 has it reserved up to n=1.3M but you can reserve it for n=1.3M-2M.

Let us know if that sounds good to you and if so, one of the admins will send the file to you.

Gary

It sounds good, but what about the file, is that a file with candidates left after sieving? Normally I sieve myself, that should save some sieve time.

gd_barnes · 2011-10-25, 05:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiBi

It sounds good, but what about the file, is that a file with candidates left after sieving? Normally I sieve myself, that should save some sieve time.

Bibi,

We have a highly sieved file from PrimeGrid. You do not need to sieve.

Max or Karsten,

Please send Bibi the latest sieve file for k=309 for n=1.3M-2M.

Thanks,
Gary

kar_bon · 2011-10-25, 05:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Please send Bibi the latest sieve file for k=309 for n=1.3M-2M.

Just done by PM.

gd_barnes · 2011-10-29, 01:42

For port 3500 n=1.5M-1.7M, only k=315 was errorneously loaded instead of 6 k's. n>1.59M has now been corrected. Later tonight, I will correct n=1.5M-1.59M. Additionally, I have gone ahead and loaded all n<=2M in port 3500.

Flatlander · 2011-10-29, 18:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

... n>1.59M has now been corrected. Later tonight, I will correct n=1.5M-1.59M...

Not sure what you mean but I came down to find everything running from 1.5m.

gd_barnes · 2011-10-29, 19:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

For port 3500 n=1.5M-1.7M, only k=315 was errorneously loaded instead of 6 k's.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flatlander

Not sure what you mean but I came down to find everything running from 1.5m.

The above part of my response means that we only loaded k=315 for n=1.5M-1.7M. We missed loading the other 5 k's. They've now been loaded. We had processed only k=315 up to n~1.59M before the problem was found. That is why port 3500 "stepped back" to n=1.5M. If you check the results on your clients, you'll see only k=315 for several days. That is why all of a sudden, we appeared to be blowing through the n-ranges so fast. It was unrealistic. Don't worry, there is no duplication of work. I was careful not to include any k=315 pairs in the range where they had already been processed.

For clarification, all candidates n<=1.59M including k=315 and all of the others are with the "old" sieve file that was sieved to P=1405T (1.4P). All candidates n>1.59M are with the new sieve file sieved to P=100000T (100P). So you won't see an increase in processing rate until we get all k's up to n=1.59M. See the news thread for the n-range cutoff where the new file starts on all servers.

Gary

Flatlander · 2011-10-29, 21:06

I'm glad I don't get to sort this stuff out!

Thought they must be all super-low-weights ... I just run the software.

2011-10-29, 01:42	#118
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 3³×5×7×11 Posts	For port 3500 n=1.5M-1.7M, only k=315 was errorneously loaded instead of 6 k's. n>1.59M has now been corrected. Later tonight, I will correct n=1.5M-1.59M. Additionally, I have gone ahead and loaded all n<=2M in port 3500. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2011-10-29 at 02:04

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Individual overall statistics graphs	Chuck	GPU to 72	4	2012-08-20 23:58
Individual-k reservations k=300-400 n=600K-1M	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	403	2010-02-28 17:43
Distinquishing Team from Individual accounts	strates	Teams	5	2006-12-17 20:50
What is the largest individual effort currently under way?	Gary Edstrom	Lounge	10	2004-04-20 19:55
Individual Account Report queries	shu_the_genius	PrimeNet	5	2003-12-19 18:00

2011-10-24, 20:36	#113
BiBi Oct 2011 2·7 Posts	Can I reserve k=309 for up to 2M?

2011-10-29, 21:06	#121
Flatlander I quite division it "Chris" Feb 2005 England 31×67 Posts	I'm glad I don't get to sort this stuff out! Thought they must be all super-low-weights ... I just run the software.