mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Lounge

View Poll Results: What do you think?
Profound thinker 1 11.11%
Someone who maybe addicted to caffeine 5 55.56%
A bit weird, but plausible 1 11.11%
Evil lurks within this manifold 3 33.33%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-10-23, 22:37   #1
9021951
 
9021951's Avatar
 
Mar 2005
58967,17,3,3 ---> bc.ca

23·32 Posts
Talking Does PERFECT = IMPERFECT ?

I've decided to share my Sunday musings with a few more people other than myself, so here I come !

Does Perfect = Imperfect ?

A typical answer may be " of course not, silly ! ". A more reasoned response may be " no, but what are you trying to say ? ". And then, an hopeful response would be " maybe, if you consider a few limitations ". The best response is, of course, " yes, you are absolutely correct in your assertion, if it's an assertion ".

For example, does a person who stutters = a person who does not stutter. Or to be more clear, does a stuttering person stutter ? Of course, a stuttering person does not stutter !

I know this to be true, because if you ignore all the malformed words or attempts at word formation from a stuttering person, that person speaks perfectly, or just as well as I do, because I do not stutter.

So, by induction, I think, PERFECT = IMPERFECT , if you ignore that which may lead you to think that PERFECT <> IMPERFECT ! ( more than or less than, but not equal ).

And now another " prime " example of this kind of thinking is this:

ZERO = INFINITY

Be careful here, there is a trapdoor !
9021951 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-23, 23:26   #2
Christenson
 
Christenson's Avatar
 
Dec 2010
Monticello

70316 Posts
Default

Zero is isomorphic to infinity with respect to division and multiplication. Equal? no...infiinity is not an identity operator for addition or subtraction.

And certainly noone here would confuse an imperfect number with a perfect number...especially an ODD perfect number.
Christenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-23, 23:55   #3
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9021951 View Post
I've decided to share my Sunday musings with a few more people other than myself, so here I come !

Does Perfect = Imperfect ?

A typical answer may be " of course not, silly ! ". A more reasoned response may be " no, but what are you trying to say ? ". And then, an hopeful response would be " maybe, if you consider a few limitations ". The best response is, of course, " yes, you are absolutely correct in your assertion, if it's an assertion ".

For example, does a person who stutters = a person who does not stutter. Or to be more clear, does a stuttering person stutter ? Of course, a stuttering person does not stutter !

I know this to be true, because if you ignore all the malformed words or attempts at word formation from a stuttering person, that person speaks perfectly, or just as well as I do, because I do not stutter.

So, by induction, I think, PERFECT = IMPERFECT , if you ignore that which may lead you to think that PERFECT <> IMPERFECT ! ( more than or less than, but not equal ).

And now another " prime " example of this kind of thinking is this:

ZERO = INFINITY

Be careful here, there is a trapdoor !
Just what we need. Another nitwit crank.

Go back to school. Study very hard. When your IQ reaches 50, SELL.
You will make a profit.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-23, 23:57   #4
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

746010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christenson View Post
Zero is isomorphic to infinity with respect to division and multiplication.
[
Total horsesh*t. This is gibberish.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 00:45   #5
Flatlander
I quite division it
 
Flatlander's Avatar
 
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England

31×67 Posts
Default

@ 1min 16sec
Flatlander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 02:20   #6
Christenson
 
Christenson's Avatar
 
Dec 2010
Monticello

5·359 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
Total horsesh*t. This is gibberish.
Let me re-phrase: (I've been working problems out of Leveque's number theory book, but didn't quite get my proper mathematical hat on....)
Under the map R*-->1/R*, where R* is the real numbers with infinity added,
the operations of multiplication and division are preserved, with zero mapped to infinity and vice-versa.
This map is 1 to 1 and onto. and therefore is an isomorphism.

What did I miss? Surely isomorphisms aren't limited to rings, though they may be more useful there...
Christenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 07:14   #7
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

2×3×7×112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9021951 View Post
So, by induction, I think, PERFECT = IMPERFECT , if you ignore that which may lead you to think that PERFECT <> IMPERFECT ! ( more than or less than, but not equal )
Yeah. And 1 = 2, if you ignore the extra 1 that is causing the 2 to not be equal to 1.

EDIT:- btw, there is a poll in there, if anyone cares.

Last fiddled with by axn on 2011-10-24 at 07:15 Reason: POLL
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 07:50   #8
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

24×389 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9021951 View Post
Does Perfect = Imperfect ?
Yes it does ... but only if you live in Wonderland with Alice. And you can even extend your argument to "anyOneThing = anyOtherThing", you just have to make sure you ignore all the things where anyOneThing != anyOtherThing and, eureka, you will find that anyOneThing = anyOtherThing.

For the poll - I was looking for the fifth option: Wish I hadn't clicked on this topic.

Last fiddled with by retina on 2011-10-24 at 07:51
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 11:18   #9
Christenson
 
Christenson's Avatar
 
Dec 2010
Monticello

5·359 Posts
Default

You need to watch Flatlander's video up there....really...
Christenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 11:24   #10
R.D. Silverman
 
R.D. Silverman's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

22×5×373 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christenson View Post
Let me re-phrase: (I've been working problems out of Leveque's number theory book, but didn't quite get my proper mathematical hat on....)
Under the map R*-->1/R*, where R* is the real numbers with infinity added,
the operations of multiplication and division are preserved, with zero mapped to infinity and vice-versa.
This map is 1 to 1 and onto. and therefore is an isomorphism.

What did I miss? Surely isomorphisms aren't limited to rings, though they may be more useful there...
You need to state that you are working in the EXTENDED REALS and not
the REALS.
R.D. Silverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-24, 13:03   #11
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

24·389 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christenson View Post
You need to watch Flatlander's video up there....really...
I've no flash player here. Perhaps you could explain what you are referring to?
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Down to a perfect number fivemack Aliquot Sequences 0 2014-12-23 09:47
Odd Perfect Number is 36k+9 ? isaac Miscellaneous Math 5 2014-07-22 22:18
Next perfect square after 2^n. soumya Miscellaneous Math 1 2013-03-28 02:06
Perfect square or not? jnml Puzzles 12 2012-04-28 21:33
Odd Perfect Numbers Zeta-Flux Math 1 2003-05-28 19:41

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:56.


Mon Aug 2 05:56:11 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 25 mins, 0 users, load averages: 1.32, 1.27, 1.26

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.