mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-10-17, 22:03   #23
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

11100001101012 Posts
Default

How do you catch expiring LLs?
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-17, 22:43   #24
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22·691 Posts
Default

There are lots of 50 and 51Ms available until around 1000 UTC. I just ask for LL tests on the manual assignments page. PM me and I can send you some to TF.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-18, 01:09   #25
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·29·83 Posts
Default

so like between 0500-1000? (or so?)
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-18, 06:05   #26
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22·691 Posts
Default

Yup! Like right now.
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-18, 13:11   #27
Mr. P-1
 
Mr. P-1's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

7×167 Posts
Default

Expired exponents are made available from about 23:40 UTC each day. 00:40 my local time. If I'm still up I usually try to grab some needing P-1.

Last night I grabbed a whole bunch, in the 45M-49M range. Far more than I need, and including many with P-1 done. Most of the 45Ms and 46Ms and some of the 47Ms have been factored to 68 bits only. Most of the rest to 69.

If anyone want to take any of these on, PM me. Otherwise I will unreserve them.
Mr. P-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-19, 00:25   #28
Christenson
 
Christenson's Avatar
 
Dec 2010
Monticello

5·359 Posts
Default

Your batch to me has just completed 71 bits, just the one factor you know about; I'll do 72 bits in a few days. I'm up for a batch of 50 or 100 to 69 bits.
Christenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-19, 06:02   #29
davieddy
 
davieddy's Avatar
 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England

2×3×13×83 Posts
Default As Hoc Basis

I ask rhetorically:
"Why can't the numerous GPU users get urgent TF work in the
current LL assignment range?"
"Why will your average LL tester not get a nicely TFed expo <50M ?"

This is a "Distributed project".
Grab fewer at a time, and TF to 72 bits, giving other folk a chance to do likewise.

David,
26% through LL testing 45.5M (TFed to 74 bits)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
51567343
This exponent last had TF activty in May 2010. I know me and many others have been getting hundreds and thousands of TF assignments up to 71 bits, but usually in the 54M-55M range, at least in my experience. How come this exponent hasn't been assigned for more TF'ing?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
Since GPUs have successfully got most exponents up to 2^70, I've started handing out some TF to 2^71 to keep the GPUs busy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
But then why was this one sent straight to LL? It's only at 69.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
These extra bits of TF are done manually on a rather ad hoc basis.
Quote:
Originally Posted by davieddy View Post
I would replace "rather" with "extremely"David
Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
Try asking for exponents with a lower bound of 50M or more. I was able to get 400 54Ms this way. Starting with zero may not be ideal depending on the way the Primenet server is coded.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
How do you catch expiring LLs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
There are lots of 50 and 51Ms available until around 1000 UTC. I just ask for LL tests on the manual assignments page. PM me and I can send you some to TF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
There is nothing stopping GPUs from taking 54Ms to 72 or 73. Just ask for LL tests and then change the assignment type.
I have started catching expiring LLs and using my GPU to TF them to 71 bits. I was doing 72 but I can't keep up without help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P-1 View Post
Expired exponents are made available from about 23:40 UTC each day. 00:40 my local time. If I'm still up I usually try to grab some needing P-1.
Last night I grabbed a whole bunch, in the 45M-49M range. Far more than I need, and including many with P-1 done. Most of the 45Ms and 46Ms and some of the 47Ms have been factored to 68 bits only. Most of the rest to 69.If anyone want to take any of these on, PM me. Otherwise I will unreserve them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christenson View Post
Your batch to me has just completed 71 bits, just the one factor you know about; I'll do 72 bits in a few days. I'm up for a batch of 50 or 100 to 69 bits.

Last fiddled with by davieddy on 2011-10-19 at 06:27
davieddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-19, 11:59   #30
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

16010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davieddy View Post
I ask rhetorically:
"Why can't the numerous GPU users get urgent TF work in the
current LL assignment range?"
"Why will your average LL tester not get a nicely TFed expo <50M ?"

This is a "Distributed project".
Grab fewer at a time, and TF to 72 bits, giving other folk a chance to do likewise.

David,
26% through LL testing 45.5M (TFed to 74 bits)
Speaking for myself,

I'm still waiting on PrimeNet integration into mfaktc. So right now it's a manual process. I grab DC assignment and TF to 69, with a goal of going to 70 (maybe even 71) eventually.

IMO LL candidate at the wavefront receive enough attention, with the PrimeNet infrastructure directly handling it. Although I manually TF to 72 the candidate I get assigned to do LL.
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-19, 14:35   #31
Mr. P-1
 
Mr. P-1's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

49116 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davieddy View Post
I ask rhetorically:
"Why can't the numerous GPU users get urgent TF work in the
current LL assignment range?"
"Why will your average LL tester not get a nicely TFed expo <50M ?"

This is a "Distributed project".
Grab fewer at a time, and TF to 72 bits, giving other folk a chance to do likewise.
Option 1: TF 25 newly-expired assignments from 68 to 72, and find about 1 factor that would not otherwise be found (assuming a 1% chance of finding such a factor per bit level).

Option 2: Using the same resources, TF 375 newly-expired assignments from 68 to 69. amd find about 3.75 new factors.

Option 2 is the clear win here, assuming that the exponents would not otherwise enjoy further TFing. I've been grabbing exponents shortly after expiry for years now, (albeit in much smaller quantities, solely to meet my own need for P-1able assignments), and I've never seen any indication that others are doing likewise. Rather it looks as though they're being taken one-by-one by clients which are probably not doing any more TF.

I've now given away for TFing all of the assignments which I grabbed over the past couple of days, except for the ones I'm keeping for myself. I won't be grabbing any more for a while unless someone asks. If anyone else wants to grab some, have at it. If they're busy (or asleep) when the expiries happen, I'll willing to grab some on their behalf. Otherwise, the most likely outcome is that the expiries will be re-taken up for LLing and never TFed further.
Mr. P-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-19, 19:08   #32
Christenson
 
Christenson's Avatar
 
Dec 2010
Monticello

5×359 Posts
Default

Funny, it looks like ckdo has been grabbing large numbers of exponents and doing one bitlevel (with help from his friends) in the 27M area...doing much the same calculation.
Me, I've just set most of my cores to doing P-1, and they get whatever Primenet hands them...

Last fiddled with by Christenson on 2011-10-19 at 19:09
Christenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-19, 20:07   #33
davieddy
 
davieddy's Avatar
 
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England

2×3×13×83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
Speaking for myself,

I'm still waiting on PrimeNet integration into mfaktc. So right now it's a manual process. I grab DC assignment and TF to 69, with a goal of going to 70 (maybe even 71) eventually.

IMO LL candidate at the wavefront receive enough attention, with the PrimeNet infrastructure directly handling it. Although I manually TF to 72 the candidate I get assigned to do LL.
If it is worth TFing a DC to 69, it is worth TFing a first time LL to 73.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. P-1 View Post
Option 1: TF 25 newly-expired assignments from 68 to 72, and find about 1 factor that would not otherwise be found (assuming a 1% chance of finding such a factor per bit level).

Option 2: Using the same resources, TF 375 newly-expired assignments from 68 to 69. amd find about 3.75 new factors.

Option 2 is the clear win here, assuming that the exponents would not otherwise enjoy further TFing. I've been grabbing exponents shortly after expiry for years now, (albeit in much smaller quantities, solely to meet my own need for P-1able assignments), and I've never seen any indication that others are doing likewise. Rather it looks as though they're being taken one-by-one by clients which are probably not doing any more TF.

I've now given away for TFing all of the assignments which I grabbed over the past couple of days, except for the ones I'm keeping for myself. I won't be grabbing any more for a while unless someone asks. If anyone else wants to grab some, have at it. If they're busy (or asleep) when the expiries happen, I'll willing to grab some on their behalf. Otherwise, the most likely outcome is that the expiries will be re-taken up for LLing and never TFed further.
Your "grab" is absolutely fine, in light of what you have done with it.
I just found it ironic that no sooner had Garo pointed out to Dubslow
the time and method of getting expiries, than you grabbed them all!
I hope he (Dubslow) got some.

Note that there is unanimity about 72 bits (mfaktc) being worthwhile.
It is also feasible as long as you have 15 GPUs doing your option 1,
rather than 1 GPU doing your option 2.
Note Garo's admission that he had dropped the level to 71 from 72
for his grab "since one man and his dog can't do it all".

I have suggested that the expired exponents should be made available
for TF (GPU only) instead of LL testing, because I agree with you that
as it is, they will go straight to LL with no further TF.

David
davieddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A quick question Pegos Information & Answers 6 2016-08-11 14:39
Quick TF Question Dubslow GPU Computing 2 2011-10-27 04:49
Quick msieve question alkirah Msieve 2 2009-12-30 14:00
Quick question about P90 CPU metric stars10250 PrimeNet 9 2008-08-31 23:58
Quick p-1 question Unregistered Software 8 2006-10-13 23:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:16.


Mon Aug 2 11:16:16 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 5:45, 0 users, load averages: 1.04, 1.08, 1.27

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.