![]() |
|
|
#56 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
143208 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
24·593 Posts |
Yes.
...but this is not a bug, or do you want to switch to another base automatically? |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
635210 Posts |
It will not switch to another base because it didn't detect an error. As Max stated in an earlier post, use another base (such as 8 via -b8) and it should reduce, if not eliminate problems like this with base 3.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Near- and quasi-repunit PRPs | Batalov | And now for something completely different | 10 | 2019-09-12 13:31 |
| Very (large) PRPs? | PawnProver44 | Information & Answers | 95 | 2016-05-20 18:24 |
| OEIS - (2^n-5)/3 - n odd - LLT-like algorithm for finding PRPs | T.Rex | Miscellaneous Math | 10 | 2015-09-01 18:07 |
| PRPs not prime | schickel | FactorDB | 1 | 2015-08-03 02:50 |
| Proven PRPs? | Random Poster | FactorDB | 0 | 2012-07-24 10:53 |