mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Lone Mersenne Hunters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2011-09-05, 11:40   #34
cmd
 
cmd's Avatar
 
"(^r'°:.:)^n;e'e"
Nov 2008
;t:.:;^

23·53 Posts
Cool

... step by step ... full nacelles twins ... ( search & found ... listen patter ...

demo

Last fiddled with by cmd on 2011-09-05 at 11:54 Reason: li_nk
cmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-09-05, 12:52   #35
James Heinrich
 
James Heinrich's Avatar
 
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario

7·13·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckdo View Post
PrimeNet will not allow registering any double checked exponent beyond 10M.
I assume it's allowed below 10M because ECM is at work there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckdo View Post
until James started doing the same, and faster.
Sorry
Until we can get George to unlock PrimeNet (has anyone asked if it can/will be unlocked?), should we have a P-1 reservation thread, or possibly integrate something into my p1small page?
James Heinrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-09-05, 14:54   #36
cmd
 
cmd's Avatar
 
"(^r'°:.:)^n;e'e"
Nov 2008
;t:.:;^

23×53 Posts
Default

another_demo ( an_dale ... tirem innanz )
cmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-09-06, 05:02   #37
ckdo
 
ckdo's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Cleves, Germany

21216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
I assume it's allowed below 10M because ECM is at work there?
So do I.

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
has anyone asked if it can/will be unlocked?
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=253956

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
should we have a P-1 reservation thread, or possibly integrate something into my p1small page?
Fine with me. I'll be busy below 10M for quite some time to come, though.
ckdo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2011-10-09, 16:09   #38
Chuck
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
May 2011
Orange Park, FL

25·29 Posts
Default TF in 600-609M range

I have been "unofficially" working in the 600M range, first going 64—>65 and then deciding that 64—>67 was a better option. I would like to claim the exponents from 600M through 609M.

Chuck
Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Someone has been stepping on my toes in the Christophe Clavier sequences fivemack Aliquot Sequences 3 2011-11-11 10:36
squre root step problem loong Msieve 10 2011-05-03 13:14
GMP-ECM fails on step 2 with B2 > 96M CRGreathouse Factoring 9 2010-10-30 16:38
Optimizing step 2 of ECM on Prime95 alpertron Software 4 2006-01-11 17:27
One-step Hangman Ken_g6 Puzzles 1 2005-01-16 15:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:06.


Fri Jul 7 13:06:27 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 10:35, 0 users, load averages: 0.71, 1.06, 1.14

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔