![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2002
Vienna, Austria
3·73 Posts |
As the title says.
[P. S.:My Computer is only a old Pentium 133@187MHz] [Edit:I checked the previous posts and decided to work on this range.Once it is done, I'll move onto 61-62 bits.] |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Nov 2002
Ashburn, Va.
2110 Posts |
I am already working on that range.
See post, http://www.mersenneforum.org/viewtopic.php?t=641 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24·173 Posts |
Yikes! Sorry I didn't notice your original email. I have edited the range allocation for your original assignment.
Sorry wpolly. Please pick something else! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Sep 2002
Vienna, Austria
3338 Posts |
Then could anyone give me a suggestion of a range?
As I previously posted, my computer is POOR compared to other's computers. I looked at previous posts and found that ALMOST ALL ranges have been reserved...... Is there any free ranges above 70M yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Dec 2002
Frederick County, MD
2×5×37 Posts |
Check this thread for free ranges: http://www.mersenneforum.org/viewtopic.php?t=854
As always, you'll want to double-check the actual posts, but I think this list is pretty accurate, anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Feb 2003
163 Posts |
wpolly, how about 58.0-58.5M ?
To 60 bit it's a lot of work for your computer, I guess about half a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Feb 2003
A316 Posts |
It seems there is something wrong here:
call_apple has reserved 75.1-76M (not 55.5-56M), so wpolly could continue with the range selected first or another one. Please let us know your final decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
276810 Posts |
hbock,
wpolly has edited the original post. It initially said 75.5-76 or something like that but has now been changed to 55.5 -56. So this new assignments is okay. I'm editing the ranges out list to reflect that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Feb 2003
163 Posts |
thanks garo,
it was confusing, now it makes sense and no further action is necessary. (but, did you notice the new reservation 58.5-59M by ColdFury ? ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Aug 2002
72 Posts |
It would appear that wpolly isn't working on this range anymore. According to nofactor this range is still at the original 58 bit depth.
I've sent a private message to wpolly enquiring about the state of this range, which was read a couple of days ago. So I suggest that we give wpolly a further week to respond in the forum and also for a nofactor update (in case they send results directly to George without telling us here), then release the range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Aug 2002
3116 Posts |
So it's been a week and there has been no response from wpolly, there has also been a nofactor update and again no progress in this range.
Therefore, if no one objects, I'll finish this range off. Garo - I noticed that this range now appears to be assigned to you in the currently out list. Are you actually working on this? |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 76.5-77M to 63 bits | lycorn | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2007-05-25 21:32 |
| 64 bits versus 32 bits Windows | S485122 | Software | 2 | 2006-10-31 19:14 |
| 47.1M to 47.5M to 62 bits | James Heinrich | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 2 | 2006-07-01 02:12 |
| 35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits | Khemikal796 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 12 | 2005-12-01 21:35 |
| 32.8 - 32.9 to 62 bits | MrHappy | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 1 | 2005-08-04 16:36 |