![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Aug 2009
somewhere
197 Posts |
Reservations:
Code:
200-250k RobertS (done!) 250-300k RobertS Quote:
But anyway, another one down! To avoid double work: I will continue with the seqs. 250k-300k, <110 digits. 195k-250k is done. PS: There are only 4860 seqs below 110 digits below 1M (mean size:106.2). Right now 50 to 70 seqs are passing the 110 digits limit daily! Last fiddled with by schickel on 2011-04-15 at 08:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Nov 2008
2·33·43 Posts |
Quote:
10k-50k to 120 digits isn't looking far off now
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Aug 2009
somewhere
19710 Posts |
Quote:
I have not planned to do all <110 <1M seqs. But I'm not sure, wether another 110 digits subproject is suitable or not. In most cases there are only few terms to do. I would join 10k-50k to 120 digits, after I could get to run GNFS on my unix machine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||
|
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2·1,061 Posts |
Quote:
Mods, do we need to do something like that or should we just start a "mega project" thread to reserve wide swaths of numbers for intensive work? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Nov 2008
91216 Posts |
I guess this is because of Ben's workers that are factoring all the lowest composites. This has the side-effect of pushing sequences up towards 110.
This thread definitely isn't needed (under its current title, at least) as 200k-250k is done already by RobertS and he is now continuing to 300k. As taking sequences to 110 digits clearly isn't what it used to be, I think we coordinate the remaining effort in the ranges and status thread. Then when Subproject #9 runs out of sequences we can start the 120 digits effort (10k-50k, or perhaps 10k-100k?) for Subproject #10. Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2011-04-15 at 07:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Frank <^>"
Dec 2004
CDP Janesville
2×1,061 Posts |
Oh, come on; what fits the spirit of the forum better than an entire thread devoted to a project that is almost done (and by one person at that!)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Nov 2008
2×33×43 Posts |
Quote:
![]() We could keep the thread, as long as we change the title... Edit: done.
Last fiddled with by 10metreh on 2011-04-15 at 09:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Mar 2007
Germany
23×3×11 Posts |
Quote:
My worker have also pushed the limit of the Database - thousends composites the last weeks. And we don`t know how much people run also DB-Helpers. So this work is from different Persons. And all Project benefit on that. Last fiddled with by Andi_HB on 2011-04-15 at 10:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Aug 2009
somewhere
197 Posts |
250k-300k is almost done.
Will continue with 300k-350k PS: 3601 sequences < 1M < 110 digits left, with a mean size of 107.05 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The "one billion minus 999,994,000" digits prime number | a1call | Miscellaneous Math | 179 | 2015-11-12 14:59 |
| Aouessare-El Haddouchi-Essaaidi "test": "if Mp has no factor, it is prime!" | wildrabbitt | Miscellaneous Math | 11 | 2015-03-06 08:17 |
| Subproject #9: 150k-200k sequences to 110 digits | Mini-Geek | Aliquot Sequences | 151 | 2011-05-14 09:01 |
| Would Minimizing "iterations between results file" may reveal "is not prime" earlier? | nitai1999 | Software | 7 | 2004-08-26 18:12 |