![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
5·359 Posts |
For reasons unrelated to Gimps, (my flat panel at work died, I wanted an upgrade to dual monitors) I purchased a GEForce 210 card with 512 Meg of RAM. Yeah, not a lot compared to the higher end 460s and such. I was wondering
a) what is the best type of GIMPS work to put it to, assuming I don't want the GIMPS part loading down the Pentium IV host, b) Is it worth asking it to trial factor (or even P-1 factor) my favorite unfactored small mersenne number, 2^1061-1 ?, and if so, how would I do it? (or maybe I should be looking at other exponents under 10K, since NFS@home and I might get into a race condition). ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Oct 2006
Rosario, Argentina
43 Posts |
Hi, i´m using Nvidia 210 GT for TF to lower limits. Results are regular. 1 exponent checked 64 to 65 bits/7min, doing the same with a 955 BE overclocked it´s around 10 minutes per exponent.
Best regards, Carlos |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Sep 2009
22×5×72 Posts |
Quote:
Even P-1 would be very unlikely to find a factor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jul 2003
So Cal
2,663 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts |
Can I get some help in the practicalities of setting up the card? The OS is Win XP 32 bit.
Yes, I have been reading the NFS@home people, even here on mersenneforum.org, and they definitely have M1061 in their sights, although the sieving may not *quite* have begun. Thus the need for more suggestions; M1061 will very likely be factored this year, and I might even help the sieving with one of my regular CPU cores. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Jul 2003
So Cal
2,663 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
111000000112 Posts |
I did not miss that work on M1061 by my non-sieving CUDA device has a reasonably high probability of only warming up my work area and raising my electric bill. That's why I asked for other targets.
The question remains: Do we have a practical TF or P-1 implementation for CUDA on 32-bit WinXP for my GEForce 210 with 512K of RAM? Where do I download it from? [And if it works, maybe I'll put a 460 on this or my next Linux compute box and find a few factors with it] |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Jan 2010
2·3·19 Posts |
Quote:
On Windows, you can use mfaktc (Trial division with Cuda thread) for cuda trial factoring. It is slower on lower end cards, the 210 being here just 50% faster than a core of an overclocked 955BE. I use a 220, which is about 3 times as fast as a 2.4GHz Core-2 quad (Q6600) core. (But I really want to upgrade it perhaps to a 430 or 450.) The 460 is many, many times faster than a 210 for tf and can _also_ do Cuda LL using CudaLucas (MacLucasFFTW thread). (You may need to upgrade your power supply.) Last fiddled with by vsuite on 2011-03-10 at 02:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Dec 2010
Monticello
5×359 Posts |
Finally got mfaktc running on the GEForce 210 tonight. Roughly 3.7+Ghz days/day at TF, (remembering that the host is just a Pentium 4) with Maxstreams=2, and screen response for rest of system is unreasonably slow, not usable for proper work but I don't care when it's running overnight.
I will try CUDALucas tomorrow, with luck. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is any GTX 750 the GeForce GTX 750 Ti owner here? | pepi37 | Hardware | 12 | 2016-07-17 22:35 |
| Geforce GTX Titan 6GB | ATH | GPU Computing | 295 | 2013-05-12 21:35 |
| GeForce GTX 580 for sale | TObject | GPU Computing | 13 | 2013-05-07 05:59 |
| GeForce Forceware 301.10 64-bit WHQL | kladner | GPU Computing | 0 | 2012-03-28 01:34 |
| Geforce 8800 | ATH | Hardware | 2 | 2006-12-28 06:32 |