Distributed finishing for 2,1870L - Page 5

xilman · 2011-02-18, 11:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

so maybe with Ben²'s after-weekend ~20-26M relations we'll converge, so let's target next mid-week for gathering the stones?

I've just uploaded another batch which concludes 100M-101M. Eight cores are still sieving away, though the two slowest will be stopped some time tomorrow and their results uploaded. (I'm off on a week-long business trip again on Sunday and remote access is not possible to that machine.)

A quick count of the relations so far uploaded reveals a total of 4948958, or a tad under 5M. That's a raw count, of course, and doesn't include duplicates within that set or within the relations found by other workers.

Paul

fivemack · 2011-02-18, 17:40

Running 110M-112.4M - new 24-thread workstation at work needs a burn-in test

jrk · 2011-02-18, 17:50

My meager 91-92M range is 82% complete, and I'll upload it on Sunday when it finishes. It will have about 4M relations.

Batalov · 2011-02-18, 19:36

Sounds good, everyone.
_________

Update: Yesterday, the filtering of 111M uniq rels almost converged (went into cliques, but then didn't find enough cycles; that's the pre-cusp); Today, with Tom's and Paul's morning additions, with 116M, we have a horrible cusp 12M matrix (that's with target densitiy 100). By Wednesday, we'll do much better. Probably not a 6M (cf. 1870M), but a 8-9M matrix will make sense.

Batalov · 2011-02-21, 02:38

2,1870L is now the fifth hole!

jrk · 2011-02-21, 02:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrk

My meager 91-92M range is 82% complete, and I'll upload it on Sunday when it finishes. It will have about 4M relations.

Done.
2,1870L-91M-92M.bz2 (3979667 relations)

fivemack · 2011-02-21, 12:09

110-112.4 is done, but upload bandwidth from work is very narrow (32kb/sec) so it won't be fully uploaded for about four hours.

R.D. Silverman · 2011-02-21, 12:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

Sounds good, everyone.
_________

Update: Yesterday, the filtering of 111M uniq rels almost converged (went into cliques, but then didn't find enough cycles; that's the pre-cusp); Today, with Tom's and Paul's morning additions, with 116M, we have a horrible cusp 12M matrix (that's with target densitiy 100). By Wednesday, we'll do much better. Probably not a 6M (cf. 1870M), but a 8-9M matrix will make sense.

I will drop another ~10M relations in snail mail to you later today.
You should get them in ~2days.

Our firewall prevents a direct transfer of the data.

fivemack · 2011-02-21, 12:44

Running 112.4 - 113.0 on the 24-thread machine; should be done tomorrow morning.

bsquared · 2011-02-21, 14:19

48 nice'd jobs ran over the weekend. What I have now is a hodgepodge of progress: 16 jobs are finished, many others are close, several are lagging quite a bit behind. Since Bob's relations will take a couple days to get there, I'll just let things continue. So far, I have just north of 21M relations.

I'll take 113-114 for tonight.

xilman · 2011-02-21, 20:10

Another hour to go on the range 102-104M then I'm finished. Uploading the final batch of results shortly ...

Be nice to get back to the GCW numbers full time.

Paul

2011-02-18, 19:36	#48
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 10010100010000₂ Posts	Sounds good, everyone. _________ Update: Yesterday, the filtering of 111M uniq rels almost converged (went into cliques, but then didn't find enough cycles; that's the pre-cusp); Today, with Tom's and Paul's morning additions, with 116M, we have a horrible cusp 12M matrix (that's with target densitiy 100). By Wednesday, we'll do much better. Probably not a 6M (cf. 1870M), but a 8-9M matrix will make sense. Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2011-02-19 at 23:25 Reason: cusp is at 116M. Another 20-30M will do wonders

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Finishing expired LL test	Damian	PrimeNet	2	2017-11-16 00:36
1870L : Yield Rate	R.D. Silverman	Cunningham Tables	44	2010-10-21 14:32
Finishing mprime runs	bill-p	Software	1	2009-12-08 17:45
distributed.net completes OGR-25	ixfd64	Lounge	4	2008-11-22 01:59
LL assignments on slow PCs "die" shortly before finishing?	Andi47	PrimeNet	1	2007-02-28 22:03

2011-02-18, 17:40	#46
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2·13²·19 Posts	Running 110M-112.4M - new 24-thread workstation at work needs a burn-in test

2011-02-18, 17:50	#47
jrk May 2008 3×5×73 Posts	My meager 91-92M range is 82% complete, and I'll upload it on Sunday when it finishes. It will have about 4M relations.

2011-02-21, 02:38	#49
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 2⁴×593 Posts	2,1870L is now the fifth hole!

2011-02-21, 12:09	#51
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2×13²×19 Posts	110-112.4 is done, but upload bandwidth from work is very narrow (32kb/sec) so it won't be fully uploaded for about four hours.

2011-02-21, 12:44	#53
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 1916₁₆ Posts	Running 112.4 - 113.0 on the 24-thread machine; should be done tomorrow morning.

2011-02-21, 14:19	#54
bsquared "Ben" Feb 2007 6674₈ Posts	48 nice'd jobs ran over the weekend. What I have now is a hodgepodge of progress: 16 jobs are finished, many others are close, several are lagging quite a bit behind. Since Bob's relations will take a couple days to get there, I'll just let things continue. So far, I have just north of 21M relations. I'll take 113-114 for tonight.

2011-02-21, 20:10	#55
xilman Bamboozled! "𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷𒀭" May 2003 Down not across 47·229 Posts	Another hour to go on the range 102-104M then I'm finished. Uploading the final batch of results shortly ... Be nice to get back to the GCW numbers full time. Paul