![]() |
|
|
#56 |
|
Feb 2006
Denmark
2×5×23 Posts |
Congratulations on beating my record!
You can also try submitting to http://donovanjohnson.com/mersenne.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
2×34 Posts |
It's a long way from a 350k-digit-PRP to a 14m-digit-prime
.Quote:
![]() Donavan Johnson's site seems only to have a copy of Lifchitz's site, I haven't seen an invitation to sent results directly to him. But maybe you know, how often Henri & Renaud Lifchitz are updating their site? (Of course I'm impatient ^^) And may I ask: do you looked for PRP's in a complete region of exponents for the M-numbers? If yes, could you tell me the region to prevent me from senseless tests? I would very appreciate this. greetings Matthias |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Feb 2006
Denmark
23010 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
I found the following probable primes with PrimeForm/GW. They are all listed in http://www.primenumbers.net/prptop/prptop.php Mersenne cofactors (2^684127-1)/23765203727,205933 (2^406583-1)/813167,122388 (2^271549-1)/238749682487,81734 (2^271211-1)/613961495159,81631 (2^221509-1)/292391881,66673 2^n-1 was tested for prime n = 173891 to 729991 with factors in results.pfk.split.aa.bz2 at http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/mersenne.html downloaded Jan 9 2009 dated Sep 30 (2008) in http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/facpriks.txt I have not made further Mersenne cofactor searches since then. If you want I can mail a copy of the used factors I downloaded Jan 9 2009. I think the PRP Top is usually updated around once a week. It was updated today and includes your prp as #15. You mentioned #14 earlier but there is another new addition at #6: Code:
(2^1669219-2^834610+1)/5 502485 Borys Jaworski 01/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Apr 2007
Spessart/Germany
2×34 Posts |
Thank you for your reply.
I think Donovan Johnson will see the changes if he is still updating his site regular. At least he has a link to Lifchitz' site ![]() #14<->#15 was litte mistake by myself. I thougt to have found a 361k-digit number while looking at the list, but my prp has 'only' ~351k digits ^^. As I can see from your mail to DJ you have testet all exponents up to 730000. I make a notice, maybe I will expand the region I test to 730000<p<1200000. But I still have to run ~1500 exponents for 1100000<p<1200000, thus it will last some days. Thanks for the factors but I think I don't need them as I am regular downloading Will Edgington's (and Richard Brent's) factor tables by myself. And for M-numbers with exponent>200000 the GIMPS database is more helpful to find the new factors. greetings Matthias |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I'm not sure if this is prime or my CPU-Completely lost. | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2013-04-10 07:09 |
| Factored vs. Completely factored | aketilander | Factoring | 4 | 2012-08-08 18:09 |
| Prime 95 Reccomended - Completely Lost | MarkJD | Information & Answers | 10 | 2010-08-19 17:31 |
| And now for something completely the same.... | R.D. Silverman | Programming | 10 | 2005-08-17 01:45 |
| M673 completely factored | philmoore | Factoring | 1 | 2003-03-31 23:49 |