Tedious bickering

[CRGreathouse]

Originally Posted by davar55

His submissions/postings are extremely suspect.

I feel the same about yours, frankly. But if it bothers you, just put him on your ignore list.

[davieddy]

Post #22:

Originally Posted by davar55

Yes, that might be a delightful result, but ewmayer at least thought
before he contributed his useful post.

Originally Posted by davar55

Because of posts 22 and 23.

I don't wish to repeat my post #23 here, but it was motivated
by your witless, snide and quite unjustified remark above.
I had even admitted to not yet having read the entire thread.

I will concede that #23 probably had folk scurrying for their
ignore button and/or men in white coats, but I can explain
every bit of the surreal juxtaposition of images contained therein,
why I was not in the best of moods even prior to your post, and
why my thoughts were on Alice.
BTW is the Mad Hatter's Tea Party from Wonderland or Looking Glass?

David

[davar55]

Originally Posted by davieddy

I don't wish to repeat my post #23 here, but it was motivated by your witless, snide and quite unjustified remark above (sic).
I had even admitted to not yet having read the entire thread (sic).

I will concede that #23 probably had folk scurrying for their (sic)
ignore button and/or men in white coats, but I can explain
every bit of the surreal juxtaposition of images contained therein,
why I was not in the best of moods even prior to your post, and
why my thoughts were on Alice (sic).
BTW is the Mad Hatter's Tea Party from Wonderland or Looking Glass (sic)?

Another repeat performance by davieddy. Banning is indicated.

[davar55]

Originally Posted by CRGreathouse

I feel the same about yours, frankly. But if it bothers you, just put him on your ignore list.

I have never, nor would I ever have or ever will, made a personal
attack on a poster, just as you wouldn't. Your responses to what
you consider to be my most outrageous math and science claims have
been fair (though I would not say always fully correct) and never fluffy.
As least you are trying to give us the benefit of the doubt.

[davieddy]

Originally Posted by davar55

Nothing surrounds, bounds, or borders the universe.

As I explained, the universe is a 5-d sphere.

Three regular spatial dimensions.

A fourth different small measured spatial dimension which
is the Riemann fold of the other three.

And absolute time.

Check my monograph.

An extraordinarily deceitful posting.
You remove the quotation marks and the citation of
the legendarily witty Peter Cook without making it clear
that you haven't quoted my post verbatim.

Contrast that with the "Physics Problem" thread in "Homework",
where you quote my considered post verbatim, with the addition
of "sic" after every sentence.

You make me sick.

David

[cmd]

Originally Posted by Flatlander

How many universes? I got to one and stopped counting.

"big pot ...
even today, need your advice,
relaxed!"

universe

ps We greatly appreciate you

[davieddy]

Originally Posted by davar55

I have never, nor would I ever have or ever will, made a personal
attack on a poster, just as you wouldn't. Your responses to what
you consider to be my most outrageous math and science claims have
been fair (though I would not say always fully correct) and never fluffy.
As least you are trying to give us the benefit of the doubt.

Your self delusion is truly staggering.

At the risk of sounding as obsequeous as you, I would consider
the standard of moderation here second to none.

I freely admit that the tone of my posting shows a wide
variation (which I hope is considered a good thing). Mods respond
frequently and appropriately. As you have been advised by two
highly respected members here, your childish "Please Miss,
he's teasing me: ban him" is completely uncalled for.

David

[davar55]

Originally Posted by davieddy

Your self delusion is truly staggering.
... ban him ...

As long as the moderators continue to allow personal attacks such
as this one, I can only reiterate: this poster's postings should all
be reviewed as a prelude to a ban.

[davar55]

Originally Posted by davieddy

An extraordinarily deceitful posting.
You remove the quotation marks and the citation of
the legendarily witty Peter Cook without making it clear
that you haven't quoted my post verbatim.

Contrast that with the "Physics Problem" thread in "Homework",
where you quote my considered post verbatim, with the addition
of "sic" after every sentence.

You make me sick.

To the moderators: please look into this poster's claims of deceit
and sickness.

[wblipp]

Originally Posted by davar55

As long as the moderators continue to allow personal attacks such
as this one,

I don't see a personal attack. I see a succinctly stated negative opinion. Use the ignore button.

[davieddy]

Originally Posted by wblipp

Use the ignore button.

How often would I have appreciated that option in my
teaching days?



David