Tedious bickering

davieddy · 2010-12-25, 04:40

Davar is steaming drunk ATM

(IMHO)

David

davar55 · 2010-12-25, 04:52

No sir. I rarely drink. Thanks for nothing.

davieddy · 2011-01-12, 04:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by davar55

Yes, that might be a delightful result, but ewmayer at least thought
before he contributed his useful post.

Go and kill someone from the mad hatter's tea party
and make yourself useful.

There are enough lunatics ruling this asylum already.

God

davar55 · 2011-01-12, 20:58

I don't think it necessary to react to the
stupid chldiishness you repeatedly display.

See OP.

davieddy · 2011-01-13, 17:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by davar55

I don't think it necessary to react to the
stupid chldiishness you repeatedly display.

See OP.

I've given up responding to your posts as well.

davar55 · 2011-01-13, 19:49

This thread and all other threads in which davieddy has posted
should be reexamined by the moderators and/or supermoderator.

His submissions/postings are extremely suspect.

axn · 2011-01-13, 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by davar55

This thread and all other threads in which davieddy has posted
should be reexamined by the moderators and/or supermoderator.

His submissions/postings are extremely suspect.

Ignore list. Learn it. Love it.

davar55 · 2011-01-13, 20:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by axn

Ignore list. Learn it. Love it.

Totally disagree.

Moderator involvement and banning is suggested.

axn · 2011-01-13, 20:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by davar55

Totally disagree.

Moderator involvement and banning is suggested.

Don't knock it till you've tried it.

But, if moderator involvement is what you desire, each post has a report icon (to the left). Click it and provide an explanation. No need to meta-post on the thread itself.

davieddy · 2011-01-13, 20:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by davar55

Totally disagree.

Moderator involvement and banning is suggested.

If you go back to your post #20, then my intended constructive,
relevant albeit not heavyweight post #21, you might realize why
I am slightly astonished by your quite unnecessarily stroppy and
negative responses.

Bearing in mind the amount of (by and large) good-natured banter
we have exchanged recently, I have to say this reaction is
disappointing to put it mildly.

How could you interpret axn's post as anything other than a
diplomatic way of suggesting that the two of us give it
a rest for a bit?

David

davar55 · 2011-01-13, 21:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by davieddy

If you go back to your post #20, then my intended constructive,
relevant albeit not heavyweight post #21, you might realize why
I am slightly astonished by your quite unnecessarily stroppy and
negative responses.

Bearing in mind the amount of (by and large) good-natured banter
we have exchanged recently, I have to say this reaction is
disappointing to put it mildly.

How could you interpret axn's post as anything other than a
diplomatic way of suggesting that the two of us give it
a rest for a bit?

Because of posts 22 and 23.

2010-12-25, 04:40	#1
davieddy "Lucan" Dec 2006 England 2·3·13·83 Posts	Tedious bickering Davar is steaming drunk ATM (IMHO) David

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
David and Halsall fighting (a.k.a. Tedious bickering. Take #2)...	davieddy	GPU to 72	40	2013-03-20 01:40

2010-12-25, 04:52	#2
davar55 May 2004 New York City 10213₈ Posts	No sir. I rarely drink. Thanks for nothing.

2011-01-12, 20:58	#4
davar55 May 2004 New York City 10213₈ Posts	I don't think it necessary to react to the stupid chldiishness you repeatedly display. See OP.

2011-01-13, 19:49	#6
davar55 May 2004 New York City 5·7·11² Posts	This thread and all other threads in which davieddy has posted should be reexamined by the moderators and/or supermoderator. His submissions/postings are extremely suspect.