![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2002
32×13 Posts |
I'm just rerunning the self test after every time I fiddle with the worktodo.ini, or one of the other files... It just gets annoying to waste an hour every time I find a new feature I want to play with...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
276810 Posts |
You do not have to repeat the self test for the SAME FFT size unless you fiddle with the hardware - such as changing the FSB speed etc. In your local.ini lie some lines which look like this
SelfTest448Passed=1 If you put a line like this back in, the self test for that particular FFT won't happen again. Mid you this self test happens for each FFT separately - since your comp maybe fine for one FFT and not for another. So you should let it test atleast once for each FFT. |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing | Trilo | Miscellaneous Math | 25 | 2018-03-11 23:20 |
| New PC test re-test plan? | dh1 | Information & Answers | 8 | 2015-12-11 11:50 |
| Double check LL test faster than first run test | lidocorc | Software | 3 | 2008-12-03 15:12 |
| Will the torture test, test ALL available memory? | swinster | Software | 2 | 2007-12-01 17:54 |
| A primality test for Fermat numbers faster than Pépin's test ? | T.Rex | Math | 0 | 2004-10-26 21:37 |