![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Hello,
Can anybody fill me in on how to read the tachometer-type gauge that appears on your PrimeNet page next to the listing of the computers that one is contributing? It jumps to astronomical percentages every time an LL is reported, but I've been scratching my head over this. I'm not sure what the "CPU Results" percentages are relative to. A percentage of WHAT, or relative to what? No doubt y'all are very familiar with it, but in order to avoid any and all possible confusion I've attached a sample so you can see what I'm talking about. 1208%, or 136%, of what? ![]() Thanks in advance for whatever enlightenment you might provide! Rodrigo Last fiddled with by Rodrigo on 2010-12-13 at 05:24 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×2,767 Posts |
Think of those as "GHz days turned in this period vs. GHz days that your machines should turn in (if it turned in every day's results every day)."
They will swing around a bit (especially the 24 hour one.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Thanks Uncwilly, it makes sense now!
Rodrigo |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jun 2010
Kiev, Ukraine
3×19 Posts |
A small offtopic note: Why 25.11.2? Don't you like 26.4?Oh, I see...
Last fiddled with by Commaster on 2010-12-14 at 07:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22×2,767 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
IMO the 24-hour one, at least, needs to replaced with or upgraded to one that is normalized for the period since the previous progress report. I.e., if I report 30 GHz-days progress on a 3 GHz machine since my preceding report 10 days ago, I want to see "100%" on that meter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Jun 2010
Kiev, Ukraine
3×19 Posts |
And if you have a continuous reporting of TF and "suddenly" report an LL? (aka "I dare to disagree with you")
Last fiddled with by Commaster on 2010-12-14 at 15:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
11·389 Posts |
Say a machine has two workers/threads/cores. One worker reports a TF assignment every day, and the other is running an LL that will take 30 days. What does the gauge read before and after the LL is returned? Maybe it could be made to work per-worker instead of per-machine to fix this problem for the most common scenario, though there still might be a problem where one worker does part of a job, then part of another job, etc. Or, say you completed the LL on an offline machine X and want to report it from machine Y, if it's credited to machine Y, it will show that machine Y is doing far more than 100% of its work ability.
Last fiddled with by TimSorbet on 2010-12-15 at 12:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
94710 Posts |
Maybe the whole notion of the gauges simply creates more confusion than clarity, and is more trouble than it's worth. The GHz-day numbers + rankings are plenty good enough.
Rodrigo Last fiddled with by Rodrigo on 2010-12-15 at 13:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
6,793 Posts |
Perhaps the gauges are simply eye candy and not meant to mean anything real or sensible.
mm, gauge look pretty, me like, want to run Prime95 now.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Primenet and GMP-ECM | ET_ | PrimeNet | 9 | 2018-07-04 20:28 |
| Hello PrimeNet!! | SeeD419 | PrimeNet | 7 | 2011-07-11 18:09 |
| 56.0-57.x on PrimeNet v5 | ckdo | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 0 | 2008-09-04 05:54 |
| 47.0-48.0 on PrimeNet | ckdo | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 0 | 2008-02-14 20:05 |
| Gauge Problem. | mfgoode | Puzzles | 2 | 2006-04-01 16:29 |