mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Conjectures 'R Us

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-08-02, 22:42   #34
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

597910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumo View Post
May I request the thread be left open for a bit to generate some results?
Fine by me.
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-08-03, 02:46   #35
MyDogBuster
 
MyDogBuster's Avatar
 
May 2008
Wilmington, DE

22·23·31 Posts
Default

Quote:
Max and Ian; any thoughts?
I would suggest moving it to the math forum on mersenneforum.org where it belongs.

Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2010-08-03 at 03:33
MyDogBuster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-08-03, 03:33   #36
mdettweiler
A Sunny Moo
 
mdettweiler's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)

3×2,083 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
I would suggest moving it to the math thread on mersenneforum.org where it belongs.
Hmm...I'm not so sure it would go over well there. Due to the somewhat "crankish" tone of much of this thread (no offense to Tumo if his ideas really are for real ), it would probably be moved to Miscellaneous Math Threads within hours. If we're going to move it out of this forum, I'd suggest putting it there.
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-08-03, 06:25   #37
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

101000101000112 Posts
Default

Max, Karsten, and Ian both make good points so I'll come in the middle of them:

If we can keep in the "non-crankish" tone by maintaining a discussion of the timing of various tests of different bases with different hardware/software, then this is a good thread for the project as Max alluded to. If it degrades much more into "crank-like" mode, then it should probably be moved or locked as Ian alluded to.

Admittedly, I hadn't had time to read some of the more useful stuff here. Deleting it would be way too extreme and locking it would probably be somewhat so.

For now, we'll keep it here but...

Tumo, you're coming across as somewhat "crankish". There is a thread in this forum that discusses level of "crankness" about postings. Very high in the "crank points" is discussing "secret" ideas whose source cannot be fully revelead and whose mathematical theories cannot be possibly proven due to the limited amount of info. revealed. Let's please refrain from the secretive discussion about these K-values that you're talking about. If you can't give the full info. to our satisfaction, then there is no point in posting it here. We don't need to hear it until the information is ready for full public release. Any further postings of "secret ideas" in this thread are subject to being deleted. Thank you.


Gary

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-08-03 at 06:30
gd_barnes is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bases 2 & 4 reservations/statuses/primes Jean Penné Conjectures 'R Us 466 2021-07-25 04:05
Base 13 prime found Siemelink Conjectures 'R Us 0 2009-10-05 18:27
Riesel base 3 new testing idea gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 10 2008-12-20 00:19
mini-drive for high-n testing on Sierp base 4 gd_barnes Conjectures 'R Us 43 2008-07-16 10:12
Speed of P-1 testing vs. Trial Factoring testing eepiccolo Math 6 2006-03-28 20:53

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:42.


Tue Jul 27 09:42:42 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 4:11, 0 users, load averages: 2.02, 1.95, 1.88

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.