mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Twin Prime Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-07-07, 06:07   #89
Oddball
 
Oddball's Avatar
 
May 2010

7638 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amphoria View Post
I did a test using a smaller set of k's last weekend and the change from fastarray mode to array mode appeared to occur between 20T and 25T k's.
I don't think fastarray is any better than array mode for large p's. I tried sieving a big 43.9 million candidate file at p=78T, and NewPGen needed 335Mb of RAM. It used array mode, and sieving progressed quite quickly (87 million p/sec). That 87 million p/sec rate remains the same even if the number of candidates is reduced to less than a thousand.
Oddball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-07, 14:05   #90
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

23·683 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddball View Post
I don't think fastarray is any better than array mode for large p's.
For the present purposes, p=100e9 should not be considered "large".
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-07, 16:40   #91
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

1010110110002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
For the present purposes, p=100e9 should not be considered "large".
I can confirm this. 20T-40T gives 48 k's per sec whereas 20T-50T gives 0.4 sec per k.
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-08, 20:42   #92
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

23·347 Posts
Default

Taking 106T-109T.
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-08, 22:13   #93
Oddball
 
Oddball's Avatar
 
May 2010

499 Posts
Default

104T-106T complete:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/1rgo42

Reserving 109T-111T. I've decided to stop phase 1 of the sieve at 120T. There's no point in going higher than that; even at a high sieve depth, the file will be too large for NewPGen to sieve at once, and any work done from 120T and up will be useless if a megabit twin is found before that point.

Phase 2 will involve sieving 6 files for twins only: 0-20T, 20T-40T, and so on until 100T-120T. It'll start sometime next week. Once those files reach a higher sieve depth, there'll be fewer candidates, and array mode will be about the same speed as fastarray mode. The 6 files will then be merged into one giant 0-120T file, which will be sieved at once.

For those of you who're interested, there's a 40% chance that one of the k's in the 0-120T range will yield a twin.

Last fiddled with by Oddball on 2010-07-08 at 22:15
Oddball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-08, 22:30   #94
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

23×347 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddball View Post
I've decided to stop phase 1 of the sieve at 120T. There's no point in going higher than that; even at a high sieve depth, the file will be too large for NewPGen to sieve at once, and any work done from 120T and up will be useless if a megabit twin is found before that point.

Phase 2 will involve sieving 6 files for twins only: 0-20T, 20T-40T, and so on until 100T-120T. It'll start sometime next week. Once those files reach a higher sieve depth, there'll be fewer candidates, and array mode will be about the same speed as fastarray mode. The 6 files will then be merged into one giant 0-120T file, which will be sieved at once.
Oddball,

I have already started sieving 0-20T on one core of a Core i7 @ 3.6 Ghz. This was to determine the sieve depth to leave ~4M k's remaining with a view to combining 5 such files which could still be sieved in fastarray mode. It is currently at 985 billion and removing ~29 k's per sec with 17.23 M k's remaining. I could carry on sieving this range until the removal rate reaches 0.4 k's per sec which would then set the target where fastarray mode and array mode are approx equal on this processor if this would be useful. It is currently removing about 3 M k's per day so will reach the initial target of 4M k's within a week.

Dave

Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2010-07-08 at 22:33
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-09, 18:44   #95
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

23×347 Posts
Default

100T-104T complete.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/yz39ua
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-09, 20:24   #96
Oddball
 
Oddball's Avatar
 
May 2010

499 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by amphoria View Post
Oddball,

I have already started sieving 0-20T on one core of a Core i7 @ 3.6 Ghz. This was to determine the sieve depth to leave ~4M k's remaining with a view to combining 5 such files which could still be sieved in fastarray mode. It is currently at 985 billion and removing ~29 k's per sec with 17.23 M k's remaining. I could carry on sieving this range until the removal rate reaches 0.4 k's per sec which would then set the target where fastarray mode and array mode are approx equal on this processor if this would be useful. It is currently removing about 3 M k's per day so will reach the initial target of 4M k's within a week.
Sounds good. I'll start sieving the 20T-40T range.
Oddball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-09, 20:25   #97
gribozavr
 
gribozavr's Avatar
 
Mar 2005
Internet; Ukraine, Kiev

40710 Posts
Default

amphoria, Oddball: do you have the merged files? Should I upload them?
gribozavr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-09, 20:27   #98
Oddball
 
Oddball's Avatar
 
May 2010

499 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gribozavr View Post
amphoria, Oddball: do you have the merged files? Should I upload them?
Could you upload the files (0-20T, 20T-40T, 40T-60T, 60T-80T, and 80T-100T)? I have most of the files, but some of them are missing.
Oddball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-07-11, 09:50   #99
amphoria
 
amphoria's Avatar
 
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK

23×347 Posts
Default

106T-109T complete.

http://www.sendspace.com/file/t99pfy

Taking 111T-114T.

Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2010-07-11 at 09:52
amphoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Third Megabit Drive pinhodecarlos Riesel Prime Search 145 2023-01-20 11:23
Operation: Billion Digits clowns789 Operation Billion Digits 575 2023-01-02 18:57
The Second Megabit Drive Kosmaj Riesel Prime Search 461 2022-04-10 09:08
modulo operation for polynomials? smslca Math 3 2011-04-18 17:18
The modulo operation, how is it computed? eepiccolo Math 7 2003-01-08 03:07

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:40.


Fri Jul 7 13:40:35 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 11:09, 0 users, load averages: 1.01, 1.07, 1.13

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔