![]() |
|
|
#89 |
|
May 2010
7638 Posts |
I don't think fastarray is any better than array mode for large p's. I tried sieving a big 43.9 million candidate file at p=78T, and NewPGen needed 335Mb of RAM. It used array mode, and sieving progressed quite quickly (87 million p/sec). That 87 million p/sec rate remains the same even if the number of candidates is reduced to less than a thousand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Jun 2003
23·683 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
1010110110002 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23·347 Posts |
Taking 106T-109T.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
May 2010
499 Posts |
104T-106T complete:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/1rgo42 Reserving 109T-111T. I've decided to stop phase 1 of the sieve at 120T. There's no point in going higher than that; even at a high sieve depth, the file will be too large for NewPGen to sieve at once, and any work done from 120T and up will be useless if a megabit twin is found before that point. Phase 2 will involve sieving 6 files for twins only: 0-20T, 20T-40T, and so on until 100T-120T. It'll start sometime next week. Once those files reach a higher sieve depth, there'll be fewer candidates, and array mode will be about the same speed as fastarray mode. The 6 files will then be merged into one giant 0-120T file, which will be sieved at once. For those of you who're interested, there's a 40% chance that one of the k's in the 0-120T range will yield a twin. Last fiddled with by Oddball on 2010-07-08 at 22:15 |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
Quote:
I have already started sieving 0-20T on one core of a Core i7 @ 3.6 Ghz. This was to determine the sieve depth to leave ~4M k's remaining with a view to combining 5 such files which could still be sieved in fastarray mode. It is currently at 985 billion and removing ~29 k's per sec with 17.23 M k's remaining. I could carry on sieving this range until the removal rate reaches 0.4 k's per sec which would then set the target where fastarray mode and array mode are approx equal on this processor if this would be useful. It is currently removing about 3 M k's per day so will reach the initial target of 4M k's within a week. Dave Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2010-07-08 at 22:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | |
|
May 2010
499 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Mar 2005
Internet; Ukraine, Kiev
40710 Posts |
amphoria, Oddball: do you have the merged files? Should I upload them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
May 2010
499 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
"Dave"
Sep 2005
UK
23×347 Posts |
Last fiddled with by amphoria on 2010-07-11 at 09:52 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Third Megabit Drive | pinhodecarlos | Riesel Prime Search | 145 | 2023-01-20 11:23 |
| Operation: Billion Digits | clowns789 | Operation Billion Digits | 575 | 2023-01-02 18:57 |
| The Second Megabit Drive | Kosmaj | Riesel Prime Search | 461 | 2022-04-10 09:08 |
| modulo operation for polynomials? | smslca | Math | 3 | 2011-04-18 17:18 |
| The modulo operation, how is it computed? | eepiccolo | Math | 7 | 2003-01-08 03:07 |