![]() |
|
|
#23 |
|
Mar 2006
2×47 Posts |
ending at the defined time vs the extra 3 hours will not make a difference on where I end up :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
289B16 Posts |
Quote:
Well, what I was thinking is where the TEAMS end up. I haven't even looked at any team or individual counts. I'm just trying to do the right thing for LLRnet vs. PRPnet folks since it was only the PRPnet server that went down for a while. Lennart and Sloth, can I get a vote on it one way or another? Also, if Max and henryzz want to vote, that would be good too. I think Max has already voted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
133708 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
100011000002 Posts |
Quote:
But it was fun ![]() Did we not find any prime on the rally ? Lennart................................................................
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3·2,083 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
Team Total Raiders of the Lost Primes 14543 PrimeSearchTeam 14168 Team-Goobee.org 2823 AMD Users 856 Actually, though, if you think about it, it's probably better for it to go this way (with ROLP winning by a very slim margin) in terms of the project as a whole: this way Lennart can go back to his team and report that they lost by a hair, and that they should bring tons of resources next time to help him out and make up the difference! ![]() In my earlier post I mentioned that the precedent we have set in the past for situations like this is to extend the rally for the amount of time lost due to downtime; however, to clarify that further, what we always did was float it around and play it case-by-case based on what the participants felt. Thus if everyone is fine with it staying like this, it would still not be particularly unfair given how we've done this in the past. Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2010-06-06 at 20:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
I quite division it
"Chris"
Feb 2005
England
31·67 Posts |
If it's been extended by 3 hours then ...
Calling all of ROLP. Everyone jump on the PRPNet server!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
No, like I said earlier. We're leaving it on the honor system for people who were on the LLRnet server during the outage to not do the PRPnet server.
Let's extend it. This is really cool. I think Lennart planned it that way That is just enough to outdo ROLP; although we don't know just yet. That's what I had been hoping for with one of the rallies. A battle right down to the end.It's too bad we had the outage. Then we could have done hourly updates to see the ebb-and-flow, just like a Lakers / Celtics NBA finals game! ![]() I gotta talk Ian into putting at least a couple of quads on one of these or maybe I'll have to pick up a couple of them myself. :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
"Lennart"
Jun 2007
112010 Posts |
Quote:
This was what I would like to see a match, race or call it what you like.I am not sure PST will take ROLP if you extend the race. But it is close ![]() Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
242338 Posts |
Quote:
Even though we extended the PRPnet part by 3 hours, like you said, 2 hours was enough because Lennart started pulling off midway through the 2nd hour. Here is what appears to be the final stats: Code:
PST 14168 + 384 + 244 + 24 = 14820 ROLP 14543 + 18 + 30 + 24 + 10 = 14625 Team-Goobee 2823 + 81 + 75 + 68 = 3047 AMD Users 856 ![]() Max, can you work with Dave on the rally stats page to extend port 9000 only to 22:00 on June 6th? If done correctly, I think the above should be exactly correct unless I missed something somewhere. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2010-06-07 at 03:33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Quote:
Thanks everyone for participatiing in the rally! While we were short on primes, we got a lot of pairs processed. It appears that we did 32K-33K pairs vs. 37K pairs in the last one but the last one had a fair portion of a smaller fftlen so not a big difference. I hope this will turn out to be the start of a good rivalry between ROLP and PST for the next few rallies!I'd like to do another in mid-late July but before deciding, I'd like to guage some interest at some of the other forums. With the mid-summer heat in the northern hemisphere, some people shut part or all of their machines down. Max, Please go ahead and load an n=2K range into port 9000. Doing it tonight would be best. We'll hold off a while yet on port 3000. I'll be pulling my machines off over the next few hours so it will be quite a while before we finish out that range. In doing the above, we'll have a day or 2 to decide if we want to load another n=3K range into port 9000 to make it the usual n=5K range; based on the ongoing load on the server. Gary |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LLRnet/PRPnet rally April 4th-11th | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 55 | 2011-04-25 09:35 |
| LLRnet/PRPnet rally January 3rd-10th | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 48 | 2011-01-12 10:14 |
| LLRnet/PRPnet rally Oct. 27th-Nov. 3rd | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 33 | 2010-12-24 19:16 |
| LLRnet/PRPnet rally August 12th-19th | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 88 | 2010-09-09 12:50 |
| LLRnet server rally 400<k<1001 June 20-22 | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 67 | 2008-06-23 15:32 |