![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jul 2003
wear a mask
2·829 Posts |
Dat File
sieve files Sieve Program sr5sieve Factor Submission factor submission Testing Programs LLR PFGW phrot PRPnet 2.4.7 Replace programs with the following: http://sr5.psp-project.de/ Last fiddled with by Joe O on 2011-02-18 at 16:27 Reason: New versions of LLR and PFGW |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Sep 2004
2·5·283 Posts |
Links here should also be updated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Dec 2002
22·3·37 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
Simple. For manual LLR reservations people should use LLR381 client from Pénne. For automated Network LLR client people should run LLRnetV08. For sieve people should run sr5sieve from Geoff. Someone should host the sr5data.txt file, if you want I can host it on google site.
Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2010-05-25 at 20:53 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Dec 2002
22×3×37 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Sep 2004
2·5·283 Posts |
Quote:
Anyway, you can ask Lars to host a prpnet server too where he can easily set up one and have coordinate stats page. I think the project should have three directions: manual sieve, manual LLR and automated LLR with llrnet and prpnet servers. Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2010-05-25 at 22:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Aug 2002
3×52×7 Posts |
What about a PRPnet like sieve system that hands out 10G assignments? We might be able to get more people sieving. Nothing elaborate, just as simple as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jun 2003
505310 Posts |
BOINC
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11000110010112 Posts |
The link for phrot in the first post is wrong. It should be this: http://home.roadrunner.com/~mrodenkirch/home/Phrot.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Dec 2002
22·3·37 Posts |
I think maybe it should be completely removed along with others since there is no more individual k reservations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11·577 Posts |
Quote:
Note that the following is my opinion. I haven't fully followed all of the discussions and I would guess that there were discussions outside of this forum regarding the choice of LLRNET. It is my opinion that PRPNet is a much better choice than LLRNet for this project. Why? It opens the door to more people participating. It has native support for Sierpinski/Riesel type projects. It is not married to a specific version of LLR. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Links to factoring programs | smh | Factoring | 71 | 2019-02-21 22:33 |
| Links | davieddy | Information & Answers | 9 | 2010-10-08 14:27 |
| Links to Factoring Programs | rogue | Factoring | 32 | 2009-09-17 11:40 |
| Links question | ET_ | PrimeNet | 0 | 2008-01-26 09:35 |
| Links. | Xyzzy | Forum Feedback | 2 | 2007-03-18 02:17 |