mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Cunningham Tables

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-04-28, 04:09   #12
Andi47
 
Andi47's Avatar
 
Oct 2004
Austria

9B216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raman View Post
Have you started up with 7,393+ for that sieving activity, what is the progress right now?
(range of special-q being sieved, number of relations that have been accumulated)
Yes, I have already started with 7,393+. By now I have sieved ~60% of the subrange of 20-30M and ~40% of the subrange of 30-40M, so it will still take quite a while.
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-29, 22:08   #13
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

23518 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi_HB View Post
juno you can start the sieving - i will mail now to Sam Wagstaff and unreserve 10,286+
Either please unreserve the number or make some progress together upon that candidate. Please don't stall. Some other person can do so with this otherwise, rather.

Few Questions/Clarifications please:
1) While sieving any (say Cunningham) number (composite), we sieve from (for example 50M-150M range of special-q, etc.) leaving out the smaller special-q values? Why is this so, that lower range is being ignored up?

2) While sieving for any sextic upon the algebraic side, the yields per special-q for the lower special-q values/ranges are high, but for that quartics, sieving upon the rational side, the yields for the higher (or intermediate rather?) special-q are at peak? Why is this so, again, thus? Repeatedly...

Last fiddled with by Raman on 2010-04-29 at 22:10 Reason: ny nuch
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-30, 09:47   #14
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

3×419 Posts
Smile Get ready!

Alert, please notice that
From my side,
5,400+ is certainly due tomorrow (May 1)
3,581+ falling upon May 3
This is for 100% sure, of course!
Please wake up!

5,400+
linear algebra completed 9742777 of 10066956 dimensions (96.8%, ETA 11h33m)

Last fiddled with by Raman on 2010-04-30 at 09:53
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-30, 11:07   #15
Andi_HB
 
Andi_HB's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Germany

23×3×11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raman View Post
Either please unreserve the number or make some progress together upon that candidate. Please don't stall. Some other person can do so with this otherwise, rather.
I have unreserved 10,286+ and Sam Wagstaff have noticed that.
Andi_HB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-30, 15:48   #16
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

125710 Posts
Default

Thus, I'm sorry for making you up to unreserve that number.
If you wish, you can send that relations you have accumulated, range of special-q
sieved, polynomial to whoever is willing to do so with this number,
in order to earn up with your own credit for that candidate.
(Is that Juno Fernandez, in any case?)

Last fiddled with by Raman on 2010-04-30 at 15:52
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-30, 17:47   #17
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

24·593 Posts
Default

That's Juno Fukos.

P.S. Don't expect people to jump from their beds for each and every of your messages. Many simply don't see your messages. You are on their ignore list.

_____

Ok, a clarification: This was in reference to the "Wake up" call earlier. Wake up to learn that some progress is 96.8%?! I don't think so. I'd rather keep on sleeping. Even if with ear plugs...

Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2010-05-01 at 02:13
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-01, 01:33   #18
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Batalov I'm probably on every ignore list of all the people who have read my posts.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-01, 02:42   #19
bdodson
 
bdodson's Avatar
 
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu

210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
Batalov I'm probably on every ignore list of all the people who have read my posts.
We have ignore lists? I've been missing out. Which posts were these, anyway?
I'm sure I've read a couple; but none worth locating this ignore_list. Could
you review a few of the worst, so that I can see whether it's worth drilling-in
on ignoring posters. Skipping on to the next post doesn't suffice? Seems like
more their problem than yours. IMHO. -bd (end of semester here)

PS -- So, can I drift on back off now? Yawn, ...

PPS - and howcum have I accumulated three (count 'um, 3) emails from
Serge since I last looked?

Last fiddled with by bdodson on 2010-05-01 at 02:56 Reason: 3p568 finished sieving!!!
bdodson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-01, 13:55   #20
Raman
Noodles
 
Raman's Avatar
 
"Mr. Tuch"
Dec 2007
Chennai, India

3·419 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
Ok, a clarification: This was in reference to the "Wake up" call earlier. Wake up to learn that some progress is 96.8%?! I don't think so. I'd rather keep on sleeping. Even if with ear plugs...
5,400+ is finally over.

By wake up, I meant that
"Be prepared to hear the factors of 5,400+ tomorrow and then 3,581+ upon May 3, 2010 exactly"

At 96.8% the running time exceeded the wall time that I specified, so that it had to be restarted, resuming from that previous checkpoint.
Even since today morning, many dependencies had consistently failed in order to provide me up with that factor.

Code:
prp99 factor: 570816590874389863426712610221376823983504352706521883023381652903468683124270020472964342360390401
prp106 factor: 7835600763231051163105353109871851898738295732904084174621530049314756920200268556563336013502822700910401
Thus, this entry opens up with that Page number 117?
Attached Files
File Type: zip 5_400P.zip (5.9 KB, 131 views)
Raman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-02, 09:44   #21
bdodson
 
bdodson's Avatar
 
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu

210 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raman View Post
5,400+ is finally over.

By wake up, I meant that
"Be prepared to hear the factors of 5,400+ tomorrow and then 3,581+ upon May 3, 2010 exactly"

Code:
prp99 factor * prp106 factor ...
Thus, this entry opens up with that Page number 117?
I'm still not entirely sure that a wake-up call for a pre-report is merited;
but am willing to be prepared for another factor report soon, while hoping
not to hear new/worrisome error reports. I once had an especially network
literate student, that none-the-less reported being usually surprized when
something computing related _did_ work correctly. We're especially fortunate
that msieve works so well over such a range of users/sites. Usually; more
often than not.

The first clue seems to be an end-date on page 116 ("factors from A to B",
rather than "factors from A to ...").

On the topic of my inbox, today's had a reply from Sam confirming four
new B+D numbers; three "conveyer" numbers, and another/harder 16e snfs.

-Bruce
bdodson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-05-02, 13:08   #22
R. Gerbicz
 
R. Gerbicz's Avatar
 
"Robert Gerbicz"
Oct 2005
Hungary

2·743 Posts
Default

http://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~ssw/cun/page117
R. Gerbicz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Overall Project Progress KEP Conjectures 'R Us 54 2018-01-04 18:25
Progress bsquared YAFU 20 2014-05-22 16:52
Nice progress! schickel FactorDB 29 2012-07-18 17:03
Progress R.D. Silverman Factoring 0 2012-05-22 14:03
Picturing progress ATH Data 1 2006-06-22 23:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:11.


Tue Jul 27 08:11:49 UTC 2021 up 4 days, 2:40, 0 users, load averages: 1.56, 1.56, 1.67

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.