![]() |
|
|
#243 |
|
Oct 2002
2·13 Posts |
I have a dual Opteron system with (2) Opteron 242's. The latest Prime95 client running on Windows 2000 is disappointing.
The Opterons running at 1.6ghz with SSE2 is running at 1/2 the speed of a Pentium 4 at 2.4ghz. 110ms (Opteron) vs 55ms (P4) per iteration. Is there ANY PROGRESS in getting the bottleneck problem SOLVED? Is there any work being done on a 64 bit client? Salem
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant
2·33·13 Posts |
There IS work being done, and I think the problem was identified in some other thread. Any progress, George?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#245 | |
|
Aug 2002
2·32·13·37 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#246 | |
|
Aug 2002
2·33 Posts |
Quote:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.70GHz CPU speed: 1694.64 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 8 KB L2 cache size: 256 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes TLBS: 64 Prime95 version 22.12, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 256K FFT length: 17.666 ms. Best time for 320K FFT length: 22.392 ms. Best time for 384K FFT length: 26.849 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 32.042 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 36.454 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 47.836 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 57.960 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 72.895 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 81.147 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 108.953 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 138.918 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 183.443 ms. For easy reference purposes here is the 1.8GHz Opteron from earlier in the thread: AMD Engineering Sample CPU speed: 1799.79 MHz CPU features: RDTSC, CMOV, PREFETCH, MMX, SSE, SSE2 L1 cache size: 64 KB L2 cache size: 1024 KB L1 cache line size: 64 bytes L2 cache line size: 64 bytes L1 TLBS: 32 L2 TLBS: 512 Prime95 version 22.12, RdtscTiming=1 Best time for 256K FFT length: 16.347 ms. Best time for 320K FFT length: 21.512 ms. Best time for 384K FFT length: 25.947 ms. Best time for 448K FFT length: 31.366 ms. Best time for 512K FFT length: 34.787 ms. Best time for 640K FFT length: 46.058 ms. Best time for 768K FFT length: 56.882 ms. Best time for 896K FFT length: 69.160 ms. Best time for 1024K FFT length: 76.882 ms. Best time for 1280K FFT length: 98.280 ms. Best time for 1536K FFT length: 118.428 ms. Best time for 1792K FFT length: 145.785 ms. These are the closest two benchmarks I found, but it looks like the Opteron smokes the P4 per clock cycle. But more importantly which offers the most bang for the buck? Currently there is no competition the P4 wins hands down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Aug 2002
21D216 Posts |
[pre]Linux opteron 2.6.2 #1 Wed Feb 4 01:34:31 EST 2004 x86_64 unknown unknown GNU/Linux[/pre]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#248 | |
|
Oct 2002
Lost in the hills of Iowa
26×7 Posts |
Quote:
Looks like a more-or-less dead heat untill you get up to 1.5Meg FFT range, then the Opteron starts pulling away. And at 1.7Meg (30-million-digit territory), the Opteron is a lot faster per clock. Down side - it's NOT 1.5x times faster, while P4's are available a LOT faster than 1.5x the fastest Opteron right now. I do wonder how the Opteron compares on Trial Factoring against a P4, though.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 | |
|
Sep 2003
Borg HQ, Delta Quadrant
2·33·13 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Aug 2002
2·32·13·37 Posts |
Some interesting developments:
I've backed the Opteron up, and transferred all of the scripts it ran to another Linux box, and I have installed a copy of 64-bit Windows... Microsoft is offering a free trial of this software... So for the next few weeks, as a test, we'll be running 64-bit Windows... What I need is for all the people who were doing development and testing to do is connect to this box using "remote desktop"... I think if you have a copy of XP on your machine you can graphically connect into the box here... If you are interested in doing this, please email/pm me for details... Comments are appreciated... |
|
|
|
|
|
#251 |
|
Aug 2002
207228 Posts |
I think you can connect via Linux with this package:
http://www.rdesktop.org/ Edit: Wow, that was easy... I just typed in the IP address and it worked! I'll have to figure out what port this is using so I can open a way through the firewall... |
|
|
|
|
|
#252 |
|
Aug 2002
2·32·13·37 Posts |
Here is what it looks like in Linux:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#253 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"๐บ๐๐ท๐ท๐ญ"
May 2003
Down not across
1179810 Posts |
Quote:
I think that's the only one, and I think it's only TCP and not UDP as well. Please contact me if you need more info. Have fun. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opteron is Hyperthreaded ? | bgbeuning | Information & Answers | 3 | 2016-01-10 08:26 |
| Opteron web server... | Xyzzy | Lounge | 14 | 2003-11-05 23:07 |
| Opteron Bottleneck?? | Prime95 | Hardware | 31 | 2003-09-17 06:54 |
| AMD Opteron | naclosagc | Software | 27 | 2003-08-10 19:14 |
| What will an AMD Opteron be classified as ? | dsouza123 | Software | 4 | 2003-08-02 14:29 |