LLR Version 3.8.0 is now available! - Page 2

em99010pepe · 2010-02-19, 23:01

I made a fresh OS install (win XP 64 bits) on my old machine. This version of llr detects the Q6600@2.8GHz as having 50 000MHz. Iteration timings are very low. For n=1.4M output timings are like 150 secs despite real time.
Tomorrow I will try to install Win 7 on it.

Carlos

em99010pepe · 2010-02-20, 01:26

LLR now detecs well the cpu after making all windows update.

Jean Penné · 2010-03-08, 20:53

Hi,

A new bug is now fixed on the development version.
You can download it from :
http://jpenne.free.fr/Development/

It occured on some candidates having a small factor...
This bug then caused a fatal error at setup!

I took advantage of this issue to improve all the error recovery code!
Please, let me know if any problem remains.

Best Regards,
Jean

Joe O · 2010-03-11, 18:12

When will version 3.80 be incorporated in LLRnet?

rogue · 2010-03-11, 18:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe O

When will version 3.80 be incorporated in LLRnet?

Nobody has been maintaining LLRNet for years. Use PRPNet as an alternative, especially for home servers.

em99010pepe · 2010-03-12, 20:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe O

When will version 3.80 be incorporated in LLRnet?

I am also interested.

henryzz · 2010-03-13, 09:17

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13165

em99010pepe · 2010-03-13, 09:27

In that case I will use llrnet, it is better than prpnet. When unpacking the zip I am getting some CRC errors.

em99010pepe · 2010-03-14, 17:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

In that case I will use llrnet, it is better than prpnet. When unpacking the zip I am getting some CRC errors.

CRC were due to a bad download. Fix it now.

mdettweiler · 2010-03-14, 20:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

CRC were due to a bad download. Fix it now.

Works for me. :shrugs: If you can't get it to work, I can email you a copy compressed a different way.

em99010pepe · 2010-03-14, 20:32

I meant I fixed my problem. My connection went down while I was downloading the file. I have it now.

2010-03-08, 20:53	#14
Jean Penné May 2004 FRANCE 580₁₀ Posts	Bug corrected on LLR 3.8.0 Development version Hi, A new bug is now fixed on the development version. You can download it from : http://jpenne.free.fr/Development/ It occured on some candidates having a small factor... This bug then caused a fatal error at setup! I took advantage of this issue to improve all the error recovery code! Please, let me know if any problem remains. Best Regards, Jean

2010-03-11, 18:12	#15
Joe O Aug 2002 3·5²·7 Posts	LLRnet When will version 3.80 be incorporated in LLRnet?

2010-03-14, 20:32	#22
em99010pepe Sep 2004 101100001110₂ Posts	I meant I fixed my problem. My connection went down while I was downloading the file. I have it now. Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2010-03-14 at 20:37

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
LLR Version 3.8.5 is available!	Jean Penné	Software	11	2011-02-20 18:22
Which version for P-III's?	richs	Software	41	2009-01-07 14:40
LLR - new version	Cruelty	Riesel Prime Search	8	2006-05-16 15:00
Version 24.14	Prime95	Software	13	2006-02-15 16:32
Which LLR version to use...	Cruelty	Riesel Prime Search	1	2005-11-10 15:17

2010-02-19, 23:01	#12
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	I made a fresh OS install (win XP 64 bits) on my old machine. This version of llr detects the Q6600@2.8GHz as having 50 000MHz. Iteration timings are very low. For n=1.4M output timings are like 150 secs despite real time. Tomorrow I will try to install Win 7 on it. Carlos

2010-02-20, 01:26	#13
em99010pepe Sep 2004 101100001110₂ Posts	LLR now detecs well the cpu after making all windows update.

2010-03-13, 09:17	#18
henryzz Just call me Henry "David" Sep 2007 Cambridge (GMT/BST) 2×3³×109 Posts	http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13165

2010-03-13, 09:27	#19
em99010pepe Sep 2004 2×5×283 Posts	In that case I will use llrnet, it is better than prpnet. When unpacking the zip I am getting some CRC errors.