mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Lounge

View Poll Results: When will the first 10 million digit prime number be found?
0, I am not currently running gimps, there is no client for my PDA. 3 3.30%
1, I believe GIMPS is a good use of my time, but am not so in to it as a hobby. 24 26.37%
2-3, I have a small home network, or have my home and work machine on gimps. 25 27.47%
4-6, I have a small network at home/a few machines at work I admin. 24 26.37%
7-15, It is an obcession, true, but one I dreadfully enjoy. This is my mark on history. 15 16.48%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-08-26, 15:20   #12
nomadicus
 
nomadicus's Avatar
 
Jan 2003
North Carolina

2·3·41 Posts
Default

Hmmm... I did a very simplistic log curve fit to come up with M42 being the 10M prime; I'm not a mathematician so maybe I was too simplistic. Actually what I was after was the range of candidates for P to be the next M over 10M. That's a different goal then predicting M42 .vs. M45.

Can someone explain to me why log2(log2(n)) is used to match where the current mersenne primes are located/predictied? Seems to me that using p (as in 2^P-1) based on log(p) is pretty close too. I used Excel and worked the numbers using a first order polynomial curve fit of log(p) until they seemed to line up. I don't understand the double log2()'s
(I'm not even sure I understand log2 very well).

Thanks
-=- john.
nomadicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-26, 17:33   #13
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
República de California

103×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadicus
Can someone explain to me why log2(log2(n)) is used to match where the current mersenne primes are located/predictied? Seems to me that using p (as in 2^P-1) based on log(p) is pretty close too.
As far as logarithmic plots go, logarithms to all bases (excepting 0 and 1, which are unsuitable log bases) are effectively equivalent, up to a constant factor. In other words, if you have a distribution that fits well to a straight line w.r.to the base-2 log (i.e. log2()), it'll also do so w.r.to the base-e log (i.e. log() or ln()), just with a different slope.

The reason the base-2 log is "natural" for Mersenne numbers is that taking log2 of M(p) (M(p)+1 actually, but for p large the difference rapidly becomes negligible) yields the Mersenne exponent p. Then, if we're talking about a trend like the well-known conjecture of Wagstaff (and others) that the ratio of successive M-prime exponents is on average close to a constant, another way of putting that is that plotting the logarithm (to any base) of the p's of M-primes will yield a scatter plot that is well-fit by a straight line. Since we used log2 to get p, it makes sense to also use log2 for the scatter plot, that way we don't wind up with mixed-base logarithms, as in log(log2(M(p))).
ewmayer is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smallest prime with a digit sum of 911 Stargate38 Puzzles 6 2014-09-29 14:18
Wowww!!! Exactly 4 digit prime!!! Merfighters Lounge 39 2013-04-12 20:26
44-digit factor found using ECM w/ B1=1e6 & B2=1e8 WVU Mersenneer Factoring 8 2010-04-24 17:01
160 digit factor found of 366 digit (PRP-1) AntonVrba Factoring 7 2005-12-06 22:02
10 digit prime in e TTn 15k Search 15 2004-10-18 03:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:51.


Fri Jul 16 22:51:54 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 20:39, 1 user, load averages: 1.70, 2.40, 2.72

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.