![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: When will the first 10 million digit prime number be found? | |||
| 0, I am not currently running gimps, there is no client for my PDA. |
|
3 | 3.30% |
| 1, I believe GIMPS is a good use of my time, but am not so in to it as a hobby. |
|
24 | 26.37% |
| 2-3, I have a small home network, or have my home and work machine on gimps. |
|
25 | 27.47% |
| 4-6, I have a small network at home/a few machines at work I admin. |
|
24 | 26.37% |
| 7-15, It is an obcession, true, but one I dreadfully enjoy. This is my mark on history. |
|
15 | 16.48% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2002
32·13 Posts |
Yeah... so I was bored. Personally, though, I think it'll be sometime in December when my test finishes... :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jun 2003
26 Posts |
I reply it so it can get to the top of the forum :) ......And it's time to discuss it again :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jun 2003
3·7 Posts |
Should we not forget the small ones and go straight for primes M10million. That is where the money is. By the time we get there Piv 4ghz machines will be the norm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jan 2003
North Carolina
111101102 Posts |
My belief is that we will discover M40 and M41 before the 10 million prime (assuming that M39 remains as is). Of course that's the current reading into my crystal ball. Hmmm.... I better get some cleaner out and polish that thing just in case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
Anyone care to prove that there is a ten-million-digit prime to be found?
That is, present a proof that not all integers with exactly 10,000,000 decimal digits (i.e., N such that N is in Z and 10^9,999,999 < N < 10^10,000,000) are composite. Who can present the most elegant proof? Proof by (counter-)example will be considered the most elegant method. :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
let n = 10^9,999,999
there exists a prime p such that n < p < 2n (chebychev's theorem) 2 * 10^9,999,999 has 10 million digits |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
That's the one I had in mind, though I didn't recall the theorem's being named after Chebychev. By the same method, for every k > 0 there are at least three primes with k decimal digits.
Is there another elegant proof? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
19×613 Posts |
A related question (albeit one of a probabilistic nature): what is the expected number of primes having exactly 10,000,000 decimal digits?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Feb 2003
2·3·29 Posts |
Well, if we can assume (without proof :) ) that E[pi(n)], the expected number of primes less than n, is n / ln(n), then the short answer is:
E[pi(n)] = 10^(10^7)/ln(10^(10^7)) - 10^(10^7 - 1)/ln(10^(10^7 - 1)) or, more coarsely, about 3.9 * 10^(10^7 - 8 ) Unelss my math is wrong, in which case it will no doubt be corrected by another poster. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Sep 2002
Austin, TX
3·11·17 Posts |
I'm thinking the first 10million digit mersenne prime is above M45
. I just kind of did a curve of the past primes and there location on a number line :D .According to my little unproved theory, the next mersenne prime is around M25 :D . |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×4,909 Posts |
Shouldn't that be 25Mnot M25? M25 Has been already found.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Smallest prime with a digit sum of 911 | Stargate38 | Puzzles | 6 | 2014-09-29 14:18 |
| Wowww!!! Exactly 4 digit prime!!! | Merfighters | Lounge | 39 | 2013-04-12 20:26 |
| 44-digit factor found using ECM w/ B1=1e6 & B2=1e8 | WVU Mersenneer | Factoring | 8 | 2010-04-24 17:01 |
| 160 digit factor found of 366 digit (PRP-1) | AntonVrba | Factoring | 7 | 2005-12-06 22:02 |
| 10 digit prime in e | TTn | 15k Search | 15 | 2004-10-18 03:11 |