![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway
7×31 Posts |
Hi everyone! :)
Jean Penné has now officially released LLR 3.8.0 which gives a nice speed boost when running this project. According to the documentation it's 2-5%, but I've seen a 10% increase when running LLR on all cores on an Intel Quad. This is a good time to upgrade to PRPclient 2.4.7 aswell as there are known issues with the older versions. IMPORTANT!! LLR 3.7.1 and LLR 3.8.0 do not produce compatible checkpoint files. If you are in the middle of a test and upgrade LLR to 3.8.0 it will start over. A way to do this gracefully is to upgrade PRPclient to 2.4.7 and set number of WUs to 0. The client will then finish the current WU and not download a new one. To do this, change these lines (you will obviously have to set them back to 1 once you have upgraded LLR): server=PSPtest:80:1:www.psp-project.de:7100 server=PSPtestdc:20:1:www.psp-project.de:7101 to this: server=PSPtest:80:0:www.psp-project.de:7100 server=PSPtestdc:20:0:www.psp-project.de:7101 With the new package, we've set the client to run 80% first pass and 20% second pass as this helps the project to keep up with second pass. Please note that running second pass is optional, and you are free to set these percentages as you please! You can download PRPclient 2.4.7 with or without the new LLR here: http://tools.1up.no/psp/prpclient/ This package is specially built for this project (genefer is removed) so please do not use this against the PrimeGrid PRPnet servers. LLR 3.8.0 standalone can be downloaded here (PRPclient uses the cllr version): http://jpenne.free.fr/index2.html You can upgrade PRPclient and LLR over an existing installation by adding them to the the "programs" folder and running the "install" batch file according to your number of cores (I've only tested that on windows). You might want to update your ini files aswell. Thanks to: Rogue for PRPnet 2.4.7 Jean Penné for LLR 3.8.0 Runesk for packaging the programs for this project. I hope I have covered everything in this post, but please ask if you have any questions. :) Ltd: If you want to host these packages on the psp-project.de servers, please copy them and alter this post. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
23·41 Posts |
Attention !
With the new version, I have test my gigantic prime triplet. The 3rd number is not prime, but it is prime. It is 2072644824759 * 2^33333 -1,+1,+5 shot test-file is 954651922:T:0:2:131 2072644824759 33333 best Norman Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-02-09 at 13:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway
7×31 Posts |
I don't understand... Do you mean LLR 3.8.0 says 2072644824759*2^33333+5 isn't prime, but you have verified by other methods that it is?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
1010010002 Posts |
Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-02-09 at 14:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway
D916 Posts |
I did some testing, and I doubt this is relevant for this project. But I really appreciate you letting us know.
LLR 3.7.1c: Code:
C:\cllrtestold>cllrold.exe -d -q"2072644824759*2^33333+1" Starting Proth prime test of 2072644824759*2^33333+1 Using zero-padded FFT length 3584, a = 7 2072644824759*2^33333+1 is prime! Time : 1.977 sec. Code:
C:\cllrtest>cllr.exe -d -q"2072644824759*2^33333+1" Starting Proth prime test of 2072644824759*2^33333+1 Using zero-padded FFT length 3584, a = 7 2072644824759*2^33333+1 is prime! Time : 1.884 sec. LLR 3.7.1c: Code:
C:\cllrtestold>cllrold.exe -d -q"2072644824759*2^33333+5" Invalid expression in command line. Code:
C:\cllrtest>cllr.exe -d-q"2072644824759*2^33333+5" Starting probable prime test of 2072644824759*2^33333+5 Using zero-padded FFT length 3584, a = 3 2072644824759*2^33333+5 is not prime. RES64: 20A5CD45B0850A08. OLD64: 61F167D1118F1E15 Time : 1.911 sec. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17×251 Posts |
Quote:
LLR 3.8.0: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is not prime. RES64: 20A5CD45B0850A08. OLD64: 61F167D1118F1E15" PFGW 3.3.1 (uses GWNUM 25.13): "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is 3-PRP!" Prime95 25.11: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is a probable prime!" I don't know of a good way to independently (i.e. without GWNUM), and in reasonable time, verify which is correct, but it would appear that LLR 3.8.0 has the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway
7×31 Posts |
FYI: I've notified Jean of this thread. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22·5·29 Posts |
Quote:
Also, to test without gwnum may be a good idea... Sorry for this drawback, Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Jan 2007
Germany
23·41 Posts |
Quote:
For smaller numbers ,like n*2^333 -1,+1,+5 works LLR3.8 correct. Maybe without my triplet, the bug will be never found by us
Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-02-09 at 16:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22×5×29 Posts |
Quote:
Thanks! Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
11000110010112 Posts |
Quote:
Jean, I suggest you run some of the numbers posted in that thread through LLR 3.8.0 and see if you see some of the same issues. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tired of all the prpclient console windows? | opyrt | Prime Sierpinski Project | 4 | 2010-05-31 08:42 |