mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Prime Sierpinski Project

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2010-02-09, 09:41   #1
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

7×31 Posts
Thumbs up PRPclient 2.4.7 with LLR 3.8.0 now available!

Hi everyone! :)

Jean Penné has now officially released LLR 3.8.0 which gives a nice speed boost when running this project. According to the documentation it's 2-5%, but I've seen a 10% increase when running LLR on all cores on an Intel Quad.

This is a good time to upgrade to PRPclient 2.4.7 aswell as there are known issues with the older versions.

IMPORTANT!!

LLR 3.7.1 and LLR 3.8.0 do not produce compatible checkpoint files. If you are in the middle of a test and upgrade LLR to 3.8.0 it will start over. A way to do this gracefully is to upgrade PRPclient to 2.4.7 and set number of WUs to 0. The client will then finish the current WU and not download a new one. To do this, change these lines (you will obviously have to set them back to 1 once you have upgraded LLR):

server=PSPtest:80:1:www.psp-project.de:7100
server=PSPtestdc:20:1:www.psp-project.de:7101

to this:

server=PSPtest:80:0:www.psp-project.de:7100
server=PSPtestdc:20:0:www.psp-project.de:7101

With the new package, we've set the client to run 80% first pass and 20% second pass as this helps the project to keep up with second pass. Please note that running second pass is optional, and you are free to set these percentages as you please!

You can download PRPclient 2.4.7 with or without the new LLR here: http://tools.1up.no/psp/prpclient/

This package is specially built for this project (genefer is removed) so please do not use this against the PrimeGrid PRPnet servers.

LLR 3.8.0 standalone can be downloaded here (PRPclient uses the cllr version): http://jpenne.free.fr/index2.html

You can upgrade PRPclient and LLR over an existing installation by adding them to the the "programs" folder and running the "install" batch file according to your number of cores (I've only tested that on windows). You might want to update your ini files aswell.

Thanks to:
Rogue for PRPnet 2.4.7
Jean Penné for LLR 3.8.0
Runesk for packaging the programs for this project.

I hope I have covered everything in this post, but please ask if you have any questions. :)

Ltd: If you want to host these packages on the psp-project.de servers, please copy them and alter this post.
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 13:35   #2
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

14816 Posts
Default

Attention !

With the new version, I have test my gigantic prime triplet. The 3rd number is not prime, but it is prime.

It is

2072644824759 * 2^33333 -1,+1,+5

shot test-file is

954651922:T:0:2:131
2072644824759 33333


best

Norman

Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-02-09 at 13:42
Cybertronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 14:23   #3
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

D916 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybertronic View Post
Attention !

With the new version, I have test my gigantic prime triplet. The 3rd number is not prime, but it is prime.

It is 2072644824759 * 2^33333 -1,+1,+5
I don't understand... Do you mean LLR 3.8.0 says 2072644824759*2^33333+5 isn't prime, but you have verified by other methods that it is?
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 14:34   #4
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

1010010002 Posts
Default

Yes, the triplet was found with LLR 3,7.

Look here:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/cyndmc

Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-02-09 at 14:40
Cybertronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 14:39   #5
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

7×31 Posts
Default

I did some testing, and I doubt this is relevant for this project. But I really appreciate you letting us know.

LLR 3.7.1c:
Code:
C:\cllrtestold>cllrold.exe -d -q"2072644824759*2^33333+1"
Starting Proth prime test of 2072644824759*2^33333+1
Using zero-padded FFT length 3584, a = 7
2072644824759*2^33333+1 is prime!  Time : 1.977 sec.
LLR 3.8.0:
Code:
C:\cllrtest>cllr.exe -d -q"2072644824759*2^33333+1"
Starting Proth prime test of 2072644824759*2^33333+1
Using zero-padded FFT length 3584, a = 7
2072644824759*2^33333+1 is prime!  Time : 1.884 sec.
But with the +5 I get this:
LLR 3.7.1c:
Code:
C:\cllrtestold>cllrold.exe -d -q"2072644824759*2^33333+5"
Invalid expression in command line.
LLR 3.8.0:
Code:
C:\cllrtest>cllr.exe -d-q"2072644824759*2^33333+5"
Starting probable prime test of 2072644824759*2^33333+5
Using zero-padded FFT length 3584, a = 3
2072644824759*2^33333+5 is not prime.  RES64: 20A5CD45B0850A08.  OLD64: 61F167D1118F1E15  Time : 1.911 sec.
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 14:44   #6
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

102538 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opyrt View Post
I don't understand... Do you mean LLR 3.8.0 says 2072644824759*2^33333+5 isn't prime, but you have verified by other methods that it is?
LLR 3.7.2: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is 3-Strong PRP! (3 more test(s))"
LLR 3.8.0: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is not prime. RES64: 20A5CD45B0850A08. OLD64: 61F167D1118F1E15"
PFGW 3.3.1 (uses GWNUM 25.13): "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is 3-PRP!"
Prime95 25.11: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is a probable prime!"

I don't know of a good way to independently (i.e. without GWNUM), and in reasonable time, verify which is correct, but it would appear that LLR 3.8.0 has the problem.
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 15:56   #7
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

7×31 Posts
Default

FYI: I've notified Jean of this thread. :)
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 16:06   #8
Jean Penné
 
Jean Penné's Avatar
 
May 2004
FRANCE

22×5×29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
LLR 3.7.2: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is 3-Strong PRP! (3 more test(s))"
LLR 3.8.0: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is not prime. RES64: 20A5CD45B0850A08. OLD64: 61F167D1118F1E15"
PFGW 3.3.1 (uses GWNUM 25.13): "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is 3-PRP!"
Prime95 25.11: "2072644824759*2^33333+5 is a probable prime!"

I don't know of a good way to independently (i.e. without GWNUM), and in reasonable time, verify which is correct, but it would appear that LLR 3.8.0 has the problem.
I also tested with Prime95 25.11 and find this number is PRP, so, I agree with you! Already a problem ? UGH ! I have now to take a look in the new PRP code...
Also, to test without gwnum may be a good idea...
Sorry for this drawback,
Jean
Jean Penné is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 16:14   #9
Cybertronic
 
Cybertronic's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Germany

23·41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean Penné View Post
I also tested with Prime95 25.11 and find this number is PRP, so, I agree with you! Already a problem ? UGH ! I have now to take a look in the new PRP code...
Also, to test without gwnum may be a good idea...
Sorry for this drawback,
Jean
Jean, no problem.

For smaller numbers ,like n*2^333 -1,+1,+5 works LLR3.8 correct.
Maybe without my triplet, the bug will be never found by us

Last fiddled with by Cybertronic on 2010-02-09 at 16:16
Cybertronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 16:46   #10
Jean Penné
 
Jean Penné's Avatar
 
May 2004
FRANCE

22×5×29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cybertronic View Post
Jean, no problem.

For smaller numbers ,like n*2^333 -1,+1,+5 works LLR3.8 correct.
Maybe without my triplet, the bug will be never found by us
Maybe... But I just found your number PRP while using the old PrimeForm program, so gwnum cannot be responsible for this error, and I should prefer to understand its cause!

Thanks!
Jean
Jean Penné is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-09, 16:53   #11
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

11·577 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jean Penné View Post
Maybe... But I just found your number PRP while using the old PrimeForm program, so gwnum cannot be responsible for this error, and I should prefer to understand its cause!

Thanks!
Jean
The problem could be with gwnum. There are issues with gwnum for some numbers. Look at this thread, http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthr...t=12226&page=2. gwnum does not trigger an error (roundoff, sumout) that PFGW can detect, thus the test result of some primality tests is incorrect. George is aware of the issue and hopes to investigate when he returns from his vacation.

Jean, I suggest you run some of the numbers posted in that thread through LLR 3.8.0 and see if you see some of the same issues.
rogue is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tired of all the prpclient console windows? opyrt Prime Sierpinski Project 4 2010-05-31 08:42

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:26.


Fri Jul 16 16:26:59 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 14:14, 1 user, load averages: 1.40, 1.49, 1.62

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.