![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Feb 2004
France
22×229 Posts |
Quote:
Who knows about LLR ? Tony |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Feb 2004
France
16248 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
22·727 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Feb 2004
France
22·229 Posts |
Hummm The help of last version of PFGW does not work (file pfgw.txt missing.
How do you do: pfgw -t -q"(2^42737+1)/3" without -t ? (I even don't know what -t means !!) Isn't there a website dedicated to pfgw where there are explanations ? So pfgw and LLR share the same gwnum library ? T. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2·32·353 Posts |
Quote:
PFGW and LLR both use gwnum, but different versions of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Feb 2004
France
11100101002 Posts |
PFGW 3.2.5 (gwnum 25.13) gives 2 times the same residue for the faulty exponent.
Jean is back !! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2×1,579 Posts |
Quote:
PRP=1,2,<exponent>,1,0,0,"3" Last fiddled with by ATH on 2010-01-06 at 14:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Aug 2002
3×52×7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Feb 2004
France
39416 Posts |
Yes. But Jean is not very talkative ! I think he is working hard on a new version of LLR. Maybe that the problems we have led him to investigate and improve LLR.
BTW, now I've found 5 exponents that generate random Residues through LLR. More are to come, I guess. One of these days, I'll provide exponent examples. For now, my colleagues and myself keep that confidential. Tony |
|
|
|