mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Prime Sierpinski Project

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-12-30, 00:26   #89
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

D916 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloth View Post
It would be interesting to see if sending PG a double check range at the same time they do one of their challenges. Lots of tests done in a short time and short run times per test.
I agree! Probably more fun for the participants as well.

BTW: the PrimeGrid progress can be seen here: http://www.primegrid.com/stats_psp_llr.php
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-30, 03:26   #90
VJS
 
VJS's Avatar
 
Dec 2004

13·23 Posts
Default

The short test for a challenge might be a good idea.

I am somewhat with Joe on the keeping primegrid to the firstpass tests only as a rule.

The 2-3M test is not a bad idea and am certainly for it for one reason only... the perspective of the 2-3m test is showing if our current 1 or 2K approach is working.

I would say keep PG on firstpasses unless for some reason they request the short tests... especially since they are doing their own doublechecking.
VJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-30, 03:53   #91
Sloth
 
Sloth's Avatar
 
Mar 2006

2×47 Posts
Default

The long tests for the challenge are nice since it really helps move the front edge of the tests forward. Also the long tests make life easier on the PG servers. Even the short tests are still 3-4 hours so server load might not be an issue for PG. Some of their other challenges are tests that are 30 min long.

I assume PG is doing their normal double checks now so the double check stuff they are doing now will actually be triple checks. If everything works out and no major problems are found I would like to see PG stay on first pass. That way we get first and second pass done and taken care of and do not waste time on a 3rd pass test.
Sloth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-30, 10:32   #92
Vato
 
Jan 2009

101002 Posts
Default

PG will only do a single DC test if the residue matches, but will fire off a 3rd (and potentially more) test until a matching residue is received.
Vato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-12-30, 11:27   #93
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

21710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sloth View Post
I assume PG is doing their normal double checks now so the double check stuff they are doing now will actually be triple checks. If everything works out and no major problems are found I would like to see PG stay on first pass. That way we get first and second pass done and taken care of and do not waste time on a 3rd pass test.
As Vato said, PG is not running double tests on all these double check cadidates. They are still quorum 2, but the residues from PSP first pass have been inserted as dummy results into the PrimeGrid system. So if one test is ran and it matches the result from here, no further tests are done on that candidate.
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-02, 18:51   #94
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·52·7 Posts
Default

What a difference a week makes:
Code:
[n Range Total Tasks 	Done Tasks 	Unprepared Tasks 	Primes Found 
2M - 3M 14215 		9516 (66.94%) 	1992 			0
Joe O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-02, 23:41   #95
opyrt
 
opyrt's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
Oslo, Norway

D916 Posts
Default

They've done (and are doing) a really great job for the project! Absolutely fantastic!
opyrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-01-04, 10:48   #96
Vato
 
Jan 2009

2010 Posts
Default

Moved on to 3M-4M now...

n Range Total Tasks Done Tasks Unprepared Tasks Primes Found
2M - 3M 14215 11515 (81.01%) 0 0
3M - 4M 2967 0 (0%) 2842 0

Last fiddled with by Vato on 2010-01-04 at 10:50
Vato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-10, 15:42   #97
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

20D16 Posts
Default Any day now!

Code:
n Range Total Tasks Done Tasks Unprepared Tasks Primes Found 
2M - 3M 14215 14196 (99.87%) 0 0 
3M - 4M 15803 15791 (99.92%) 0 0 
4M - 5M 19905 17863 (89.74%) 444 0 
5M - 6M 10487 10487 (100%) 0 0 
6M - 7M 6877 6877 (100%) 0 0 
7M - 8M 11702 11702 (100%) 0 0 
8M - 9M 9626 9608 (99.81%) 0 0 
9M - 10M 974 541 (55.54%) 416 0 
Total:   860 0
Joe O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-10, 15:47   #98
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3·52·7 Posts
Default or not, as the case may be.

Code:
Task ID
click for details Computer Sent Time reported 
or deadline 
explain  Status Run time
(sec) CPU time
(sec) Claimed credit Granted credit Application 
143850626 --- 26 Dec 2009 4:20:06 UTC 26 Dec 2009 5:20:06 UTC Completed, waiting for validation 0.00 600.00 --- pending  
143850630 116456 26 Jan 2010 4:52:52 UTC 16 Feb 2010 4:52:52 UTC In progress --- --- --- --- Prime Sierpinski Problem (LLR) v5.11
The 21 day timeout for 2M-3M has cause some serious delay, and may still do so.
Th 7 day timeout for 3M-4M has allowed it to pass 2M-3M, and may allow it to complete first.
Joe O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-02-13, 14:12   #99
Joe O
 
Joe O's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

3×52×7 Posts
Default

Code:
n Range Total Tasks Done Tasks Unprepared Tasks Primes Found 
2M - 3M 14215 14199 (99.89%) 0 0 
3M - 4M 15803 15797 (99.96%) 0 0 
4M - 5M 19905 19133 (96.12%) 0 0 
5M - 6M 18259 10544 (57.75%) 7184 0 
6M - 7M 6877 6877 (100%) 0 0 
7M - 8M 11702 11702 (100%) 0 0 
8M - 9M 9626 9614 (99.88%) 0 0 
9M - 10M 974 544 (55.85%) 416 0 
Total:   7600 0
Only 16 left in the 2M-3M range, and only 6 left in the 3M-4M range.
Joe O is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New SR5 PRPnet server online ltd Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 15 2013-03-19 18:03
First PSP PRPnet 4.0.6 server online ltd Prime Sierpinski Project 9 2011-03-15 04:58
First check and double check llrnet servers. opyrt Prime Sierpinski Project 3 2009-01-02 01:50
Double-check check? M0CZY Software 15 2008-10-30 14:20
Double Check Server Citrix Prime Sierpinski Project 12 2005-10-23 20:03

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:55.


Fri Jul 16 15:55:30 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 13:42, 1 user, load averages: 1.50, 1.66, 1.69

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.