![]() |
|
|
#45 | |
|
Jun 2003
Ottawa, Canada
3·17·23 Posts |
Quote:
So you might be too low or too high. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
With 17.5M unique relations I was still tooo low ("filtering wants 1M more relations"), so I don't think that the gap between "undersieved" and "too oversieved" is THAT narrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Tribal Bullet
Oct 2004
3,541 Posts |
I think oversieving to the point of failure is pretty much impossible for all but the smallest problems. When the input is small and hugely oversieved, it's possible to delete almost all of the relations during clique removal. Hey, you want a sparse matrix, and you can't get more sparse than an empty matrix :)
Last fiddled with by jasonp on 2009-11-24 at 14:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Jun 2003
Ottawa, Canada
3·17·23 Posts |
No, I was just pointing out that I have also seen that message when things were vastly oversieved. So for some people that might be their problem if they saw it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Msieve 1.53 feedback | xilman | Msieve | 149 | 2018-11-12 06:37 |
| Msieve 1.50 feedback | firejuggler | Msieve | 99 | 2013-02-17 11:53 |
| Msieve v1.48 feedback | Jeff Gilchrist | Msieve | 48 | 2011-06-10 18:18 |
| Msieve 1.42 feedback | Andi47 | Msieve | 167 | 2009-10-18 19:37 |
| Msieve 1.41 Feedback | Batalov | Msieve | 130 | 2009-06-09 16:01 |