![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Nov 2003
22·5·373 Posts |
Quote:
tables. These were provided a while back and Sam posted them, but without any kind of announcement that they were being added to the tables. Last fiddled with by R.D. Silverman on 2009-11-05 at 16:29 Reason: type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Aug 2005
Seattle, WA
6E016 Posts |
Indeed. I make no claims as to whether these are part of the "real" tables, nor do I have any desire to join the holy war^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H debate over whether these numbers are worthwhile targets for our CPU time. I was just questioning what looked like a factual error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
210 Posts |
Quote:
about a _recent_ extension of the 3LM. Not to attempt to impose a minimal attention span pre-req on forum posts; but I was remarking on my friend Serge's post saying Code:
Phew! There's a full update ... just brought to the forum attention, apparently by the DB. -bd (For the purposes of discussion of The Cunningham tables, there's a well-defined reserved term for a Cunningham Update, initiated by Sam. I'm saying this isn't that (as far as I know); and that I'd very much appreciate not having the thread on the 3+ Cunningham list not littered with a bunch of non-Cunningham factors.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
100101000100002 Posts |
Apologies for unintended sensationalism.
I simply meant that this was the last local table to be cleaned up for readability (with SNFS difficulty added, minus ECM efforts); per se, it was always there in posts #2-4, since Jan 2005. I looked at it several times in dismay, but because of the last 3+ factor, decided to roll the sleeves and clean it. And indeed, there was a lot of vacuum cleaning. The semi-official updates are also housed at Sam's pages and the latest factors are fairly fresh. 'Phew' only meant what Garo meant year ago. (Same thread.) As I did it, I realized that some numbers are amenable to individual contributions. But let me tone it down now. For the volunteers: 1. I totally agree that a better application of PC time is NFS@Home. Many other projects, too. 2. If the real fun is DIY, then it should be all of it, from start to finish; if not from writing new software, then at least from constructing a suitable polynomial and parameters. 3. The only place the contributor's results will go is that email pileup, for now. Apparently there are no reservations, a simple sandbox. Email Sam when done. 4. No holly wars. Peace! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
102410 Posts |
Quote:
that I forgot about). Actually, since posts #2 through #4 were replaced with the new and improved Serge post #2, I spent some time puzzling about the old posts #5 & #6 (which are the new #3 & #4). And the live link over on the Cunningham DB thread. Thanks! Strange; the original 3LM's are entirely cleared (the ones in the "main tables"), so it's the ones 1200-1800 that are in the extension (as I learned from the DB link). Err, that's (3^[6(n-3)])+1 for n = 201 to 300, corresponding to 1200-1800. The next DB page goes past that; and the next; and the next ... And it's the Garo table restricted to the Xilman/Leyland range 1200-1800. No shortage of numbers, it's like they're infinite or something. -Bruce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
10000101010112 Posts |
Done. c144=p68*p77. 3^1275+1 is now fully factored.
![]() Code:
Sun Nov 08 21:51:15 2009 prp68 factor: 28307046970942456068307849275575041770247062269862468071803789660351 Sun Nov 08 21:51:15 2009 prp77 factor: 25514712584982993649721349633001246398829959056614327094684863451960879218951 Already in the DB. Does this need to be emailed to Prof. Wagstaff or anybody? Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2009-11-09 at 12:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
210 Posts |
Quote:
http://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~ssw/cun/ Probably a reminder that it's for his file http://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~ssw/cun/3LMext would help to get it recorded there. -Bruce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
20008 Posts |
Quote:
not that Sirius thing again. With a notable degree of attention, like. -bd |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 11+ Table Discussion | VJS | Cunningham Tables | 2 | 2005-07-23 13:29 |
| 3- Table Discussion | akruppa | Cunningham Tables | 6 | 2005-07-22 20:59 |
| 7- table discussion | wblipp | Cunningham Tables | 5 | 2005-06-25 20:34 |
| 3+ table Discussion | JHansen | Cunningham Tables | 17 | 2005-06-19 14:05 |
| 12+ Table Discussion | rogue | Cunningham Tables | 15 | 2005-04-23 02:28 |