Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=150K-1M - Page 2

gd_barnes · 2009-10-03, 03:14

With the recent huge prime found on Riesel base 6, the optimum sieve depth should now be lower. When the prime is proven and submitted, I'll post the new depth here. My guess is that it will still come in somewhere between 40T and 45T.

Flatlander · 2009-10-03, 11:30

Taking 35-39T.

Flatlander · 2009-10-03, 12:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flatlander

Taking 35-39T.

ETA 7th Oct

gd_barnes · 2009-10-03, 14:42

I'll remove k=78959 from the posted sieve file later today. Chris, you may want to do that before starting. Thanks for helping out!

If the optimum depth turns out to be P=45T, when my range finishes in a couple of days, I'll reserve the rest and put 2 cores on it to finish it up in ~5-6 days after that.

I'll post the new optimum depth when I update file later today.

Batalov · 2009-10-03, 21:03

I'll do 39-43T.
The latest sr2sieve? 1.8.11?
I am trying both 1.8.10 and .11. Both work well. ETA Oct 7
39004844249663 | 51017*6^964687-1
41003460163933 | 51017*6^862123-1
...

mdettweiler · 2009-10-03, 23:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

I'll do 39-43T.
The latest sr2sieve? 1.8.11?
I am trying both 1.8.10 and .11. Both work well. ETA Oct 7
39004844249663 | 51017*6^964687-1
41003460163933 | 51017*6^862123-1
...

As I recall, 1.8.10 is supposed to be a wee bit faster for sieves containing 5 or more sequences, so you should probably use that for this sieve.

Batalov · 2009-10-04, 00:06

The speeds are within 0.2-0.5%. In fact sometimes .11 is faster.

P.S. I think that posting a not-additionally-sieved file for the 500-550K range for PRP testing would be useful for someone.

gd_barnes · 2009-10-04, 06:10

The adjusted optimum sieve depth for breaking off n=500K-750K is P=42T. Calculation:

Testing time of an n=675K candidate (70% of 500K-750K n-range): 6282 secs.

Factor removal rate for the remaining 6 k's at P=32T: 4807 secs.

Optimum sieve depth: 6282 / 4807 * 32T = ~42T.

Therefore, all needed ranges are now reserved. Batalov, if you only want to do P=39T-42T instead of 39T-43T, that will be sufficient. Thanks for the extra boost.

I have now updated the sieve file in the 1st posting here to remove k=78959.

Gary

gd_barnes · 2009-10-04, 06:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batalov

P.S. I think that posting a not-additionally-sieved file for the 500-550K range for PRP testing would be useful for someone.

With k=78959 removed, all needed sieving ranges have been reserved and should be complete in < 4 days. Would you like to start on n=500K-550K with a 32T sieve depth now? If so, I can post it in the 1st posting here. Doing that would only be slightly less efficient than waiting on sieving up to 42T or 43T to finish.

The only thing we're asking is that people finish their ranges in < ~2 weeks. Keep in mind that n>500K ranges will contain all remaining 6 k's whereas the n=370K-500K range only contained 4 k's since Lennart had already completed 3 of them.

Gary

gd_barnes · 2009-10-05, 11:41

P=32T-35T is complete.

Batalov · 2009-10-05, 17:50

39-43T complete. 110 factors, expected 102.88.

2009-10-03, 21:03	#16
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 2⁴·593 Posts	I'll do 39-43T. The latest sr2sieve? 1.8.11? I am trying both 1.8.10 and .11. Both work well. ETA Oct 7 39004844249663 \| 510176^964687-1 41003460163933 \| 510176^862123-1 ... Last fiddled with by Batalov on 2009-10-03 at 21:25 Reason: (tests)

2009-10-04, 06:10	#19
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101×103 Posts	The adjusted optimum sieve depth for breaking off n=500K-750K is P=42T. Calculation: Testing time of an n=675K candidate (70% of 500K-750K n-range): 6282 secs. Factor removal rate for the remaining 6 k's at P=32T: 4807 secs. Optimum sieve depth: 6282 / 4807 * 32T = ~42T. Therefore, all needed ranges are now reserved. Batalov, if you only want to do P=39T-42T instead of 39T-43T, that will be sufficient. Thanks for the extra boost. I have now updated the sieve file in the 1st posting here to remove k=78959. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-10-04 at 06:16

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Riesel base 6 - team drive #4 - EIGHT OR BUST!	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	401	2015-05-27 15:15
Riesel base 16 - team drive #2	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	213	2014-02-26 09:35
Sieving drive Riesel base 6 n=1M-2M	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	40	2011-01-22 08:10
Sieving Riesel & Sierp base 16	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	13	2009-12-14 09:23
Riesel base 3 - mini-drive I	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	199	2009-09-30 18:44

2009-10-03, 03:14	#12
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101·103 Posts	With the recent huge prime found on Riesel base 6, the optimum sieve depth should now be lower. When the prime is proven and submitted, I'll post the new depth here. My guess is that it will still come in somewhere between 40T and 45T.

2009-10-03, 11:30	#13
Flatlander I quite division it "Chris" Feb 2005 England 31·67 Posts	Taking 35-39T.

2009-10-03, 14:42	#15
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101·103 Posts	I'll remove k=78959 from the posted sieve file later today. Chris, you may want to do that before starting. Thanks for helping out! If the optimum depth turns out to be P=45T, when my range finishes in a couple of days, I'll reserve the rest and put 2 cores on it to finish it up in ~5-6 days after that. I'll post the new optimum depth when I update file later today.

2009-10-04, 00:06	#18
Batalov "Serge" Mar 2008 Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2 2⁴·593 Posts	The speeds are within 0.2-0.5%. In fact sometimes .11 is faster. P.S. I think that posting a not-additionally-sieved file for the 500-550K range for PRP testing would be useful for someone.

2009-10-05, 11:41	#21
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 101×103 Posts	P=32T-35T is complete.