![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
29·3·7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Aug 2006
3×1,993 Posts |
Not good enough, Paul. A countably infinite number of bits can hold a real number in [0,1] (and hence any real number); a single integer has much less information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
[0,1] is uncountable. Last fiddled with by Orgasmic Troll on 2009-09-24 at 20:19 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Aug 2006
175B16 Posts |
Yes, and so is the information you can hold in a countably infinite number of bits.
Last fiddled with by CRGreathouse on 2009-09-24 at 21:34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
Jul 2003
641 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Feb 2007
24×33 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
(This is an incredulous "how" - Do you claim that this is possible?? (even, "theoretically" ?) It is not, definitely! There are several irrefutable obstacles that make it provably absolutely impossible for an arbitrary N, to put "the electron" [as a side note: does this exist, "the electron"?] in an "orbital" (*sic*) with a precisely given quantum number N, beyond some (ridiculously low) limit. And here, I don't mean missing "technology", I mean fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. No, you can not store any integer N in that way!) Last fiddled with by m_f_h on 2009-10-01 at 21:58 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
29×3×7 Posts |
Quote:
And while preparing your reply, I suggest that you research the word "orbital". Paul |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Project Euler | jhs | Puzzles | 32 | 2021-01-19 04:05 |
| Project Euler 486 | lavalamp | Puzzles | 8 | 2015-02-04 14:28 |
| Project Euler #372 | lavalamp | Puzzles | 165 | 2012-05-24 16:40 |
| Euler (6,2,5) details. | Death | Math | 10 | 2011-08-03 13:49 |
| Project Euler | Mini-Geek | Lounge | 2 | 2009-10-23 17:19 |