mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2009-09-24, 19:02   #12
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

29·3·7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orgasmic Troll View Post
how?
Think about it some more.

One answer is:to store the integer N, put the electron in an orbital with principal quantum number N

Paul
xilman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-09-24, 19:43   #13
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

3×1,993 Posts
Default

Not good enough, Paul. A countably infinite number of bits can hold a real number in [0,1] (and hence any real number); a single integer has much less information.
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-09-24, 20:18   #14
Orgasmic Troll
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
 
Orgasmic Troll's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Think about it some more.

One answer is:to store the integer N, put the electron in an orbital with principal quantum number N

Paul
That wasn't an incredulous how, that was a curious how. I don't know enough particulars about physics to know what a principal quantum number is

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
Not good enough, Paul. A countably infinite number of bits can hold a real number in [0,1] (and hence any real number); a single integer has much less information.
um. No.

[0,1] is uncountable.

Last fiddled with by Orgasmic Troll on 2009-09-24 at 20:19
Orgasmic Troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-09-24, 21:34   #15
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

175B16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orgasmic Troll View Post
[0,1] is uncountable.
Yes, and so is the information you can hold in a countably infinite number of bits.
2^{\aleph_0}=\mathfrak{c}

Last fiddled with by CRGreathouse on 2009-09-24 at 21:34
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-09-24, 22:10   #16
Orgasmic Troll
Cranksta Rap Ayatollah
 
Orgasmic Troll's Avatar
 
Jul 2003

641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRGreathouse View Post
Yes, and so is the information you can hold in a countably infinite number of bits.
2^{\aleph_0}=\mathfrak{c}
oh right, my bad. I read it too quickly.
Orgasmic Troll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-01, 21:38   #17
m_f_h
 
m_f_h's Avatar
 
Feb 2007

24×33 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman
Further, a single hydrogen atom may store that number of bits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orgasmic Troll View Post
how?
Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Think about it some more.
One answer is:to store the integer N, put the electron in an orbital with principal quantum number N
How?

(This is an incredulous "how" -
Do you claim that this is possible?? (even, "theoretically" ?)
It is not, definitely! There are several irrefutable obstacles that make it provably absolutely impossible for an arbitrary N, to put "the electron" [as a side note: does this exist, "the electron"?] in an "orbital" (*sic*) with a precisely given quantum number N, beyond some (ridiculously low) limit.
And here, I don't mean missing "technology", I mean fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.
No, you can not store any integer N in that way!)

Last fiddled with by m_f_h on 2009-10-01 at 21:58
m_f_h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2009-10-02, 08:59   #18
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

29×3×7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by m_f_h View Post
How?

(This is an incredulous "how" -
Do you claim that this is possible?? (even, "theoretically" ?)
It is not, definitely! There are several irrefutable obstacles that make it provably absolutely impossible for an arbitrary N, to put "the electron" [as a side note: does this exist, "the electron"?] in an "orbital" (*sic*) with a precisely given quantum number N, beyond some (ridiculously low) limit.
And here, I don't mean missing "technology", I mean fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.
No, you can not store any integer N in that way!)
Please explain further.

And while preparing your reply, I suggest that you research the word "orbital".


Paul
xilman is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Project Euler jhs Puzzles 32 2021-01-19 04:05
Project Euler 486 lavalamp Puzzles 8 2015-02-04 14:28
Project Euler #372 lavalamp Puzzles 165 2012-05-24 16:40
Euler (6,2,5) details. Death Math 10 2011-08-03 13:49
Project Euler Mini-Geek Lounge 2 2009-10-23 17:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:07.


Fri Jul 16 20:07:09 UTC 2021 up 49 days, 17:54, 1 user, load averages: 2.63, 2.26, 2.25

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.