Archived reservation posts - Page 10

gd_barnes · 2009-09-28, 18:17

Reserving 282276 from a comment by Karsten in the "a little request" thread.

dekcarki · 2009-09-28, 18:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Oh, OK. Can you show it as reserved here by him?

I may take it after he is done but will post a reservation for it again.

releasing 283752

line 4768: C93 = 2 * 20399 * C88

gd_barnes · 2009-09-28, 18:43

OK, re-reserving 283752 to at least 100 digits. Since it has been specifically requested, I'll start on it right away.

fivemack · 2009-09-28, 19:46

I'm not quite sure why I have two reservations here; I'm not doing any work on them. Please unreserve them.

Andi47 · 2009-09-28, 19:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by schickel

Code:

Current reservations
 
Sequence  Who            Index  Size   Driver/guide
 10212    Andi47          2191   132   2 * 3

in the meanwhile it has reached index 2204, still with the 2*3 driver.

gd_barnes · 2009-09-29, 11:12

I'd like to reserve 584832. Is anyone aware of who might be the mystery worker who has searched several 1000 indexes on this one?

It isn't usual for the D.B. to show i=4119 while Karsten's page for W.Creyaufmueller shows i=791.

If there is a known worker, I won't reserve it.

dekcarki · 2009-09-30, 11:51

releasing 40320

RobertS · 2009-09-30, 18:13

I reserve 582828, i3787, sz100, 2^2*7

gd_barnes · 2009-10-02, 04:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

I'd like to reserve 584832. Is anyone aware of who might be the mystery worker who has searched several 1000 indexes on this one?

It isn't usual for the D.B. to show i=4119 while Karsten's page for W.Creyaufmueller shows i=791.

If there is a known worker, I won't reserve it.

Since there worker is still a mystery, I'll "officially" reserve 584832 starting at i=4119 if that worker doesn't advance it higher in the mean time.

Greebley · 2009-10-02, 13:34

A whole bunch of sequences were run through before we got the data with many at 87 instead of 80 for example. If you don't know that it has changed recently, then likely it isn't being actively worked on.

In other words, being past Creyaufmueller's result is not a sign of recent activity.

BigBrother · 2009-10-03, 07:25

I'll take 12408 a bit further.

2009-09-28, 18:43	#102
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 2²×19×137 Posts	OK, re-reserving 283752 to at least 100 digits. Since it has been specifically requested, I'll start on it right away. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-09-28 at 18:44

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Archived reservation posts	lalera	Operazione Doppi Mersennes	52	2013-08-30 14:52
Archived sieve reservations and discussions	MooooMoo	Twin Prime Search	735	2011-12-09 16:33
Archived project section+ some other suggestions	Citrix	Forum Feedback	1	2006-05-03 09:29
Archived data files...	Xyzzy	Data	22	2004-05-25 03:04
older files archived?	tom11784	Lone Mersenne Hunters	0	2004-05-24 12:02

2009-09-28, 18:17	#100
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 10100010101100₂ Posts	Reserving 282276 from a comment by Karsten in the "a little request" thread.

2009-09-28, 19:46	#103
fivemack (loop (#_fork)) Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 1100100010111₂ Posts	I'm not quite sure why I have two reservations here; I'm not doing any work on them. Please unreserve them.

2009-09-29, 11:12	#105
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 2²×19×137 Posts	I'd like to reserve 584832. Is anyone aware of who might be the mystery worker who has searched several 1000 indexes on this one? It isn't usual for the D.B. to show i=4119 while Karsten's page for W.Creyaufmueller shows i=791. If there is a known worker, I won't reserve it.

2009-09-30, 11:51	#106
dekcarki Aug 2009 Magdeburg, Germany 75₈ Posts	releasing 40320

2009-09-30, 18:13	#107
RobertS Aug 2009 somewhere 197 Posts	I reserve 582828, i3787, sz100, 2^2*7

2009-10-02, 13:34	#109
Greebley May 2009 Dedham Massachusetts USA 3·281 Posts	A whole bunch of sequences were run through before we got the data with many at 87 instead of 80 for example. If you don't know that it has changed recently, then likely it isn't being actively worked on. In other words, being past Creyaufmueller's result is not a sign of recent activity.

2009-10-03, 07:25	#110
BigBrother Feb 2005 The Netherlands 2·109 Posts	I'll take 12408 a bit further.