80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved - Page 5

garo · 2009-09-10, 23:38

Might I suggest 84M? 2M should keep the slow pokes going for a while. Though we know there are LMHers not as polite as you and with almost as much firepower who do like to step on our little toes so there is no guarantee that that 2K will remain open for us.

@Uncwilly: chalsall likes to go to 64 bits and everything from 333M to 400M is already up to 64 bits.

@chalsall: 100-200M to 64 bits then?

markr · 2009-09-13, 01:12

Mainly, I like to see the project progressing, and if I have contributed toward some milestone or other, that's a bonus. So your contributions are appreciated along with everyone else's, chalsall!

If there's some exponents below 100M left for the less-resourced, that'd be nice. Otherwise there are still plenty higher ranges. Lower ranges too - I've watched a *lot* of TF progress in exponents below 10M, and thought about doing some. There are lots of numbers, and these old machines won't last or stay in use forever anyway.

garo · 2009-09-17, 11:54

Only 80.36-80.46 remains.

chalsall · 2009-09-17, 15:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by garo

Only 80.36-80.46 remains.

Hey All. As discussed, I'm taking 84M - 87M to 64. More than half way through it.

As also discussed, I'm leaving the rest for others to do. 83M is currently completely available for you guys to begin working on.

Quite a bit of 82M has been reserved by "1997rj7".

garo · 2009-09-17, 15:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Quite a bit of 82M has been reserved by "1997rj7".

He's one of us.

Now begin chanting: One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us.

chalsall · 2009-09-17, 15:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by garo

He's one of us.

Now begin chanting: One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us. One of Us.

Hey, that's cool. Just pointing it out.

We're all working towards the same goal, aren't we.

markr · 2009-09-18, 13:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by chalsall

Quite a bit of 82M has been reserved by "1997rj7".

1997rj7 also has a fair slice of 81M reserved. Not that these reservations are just being sat on - quite a few results have been returned.

markr · 2009-09-18, 13:08

Taking 80.42 to 80.46. That leaves 80.36 to 80.42 unassigned.

markr · 2009-09-26, 01:11

Taking 80.40 to 80.42. Only 474 exponents, 80.38 to 80.40, unassigned.

markr · 2009-10-01, 22:00

Taking the last lot. None left unassigned below 64 bits.

petrw1 · 2009-10-02, 00:34

It's been a slice...

onward and upward...

2009-09-18, 13:08	#52
markr "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3×191 Posts	Taking 80.42 to 80.46. That leaves 80.36 to 80.42 unassigned. Last fiddled with by markr on 2009-09-18 at 13:10

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
76.5-77M to 63 bits	lycorn	Lone Mersenne Hunters	2	2007-05-25 21:32
64 bits versus 32 bits Windows	S485122	Software	2	2006-10-31 19:14
52.0M - 52.1M to 63 bits	Rde	Lone Mersenne Hunters	4	2006-10-14 18:21
42.6 - 43.0M to 61 bits	MrHappy	Lone Mersenne Hunters	6	2006-05-26 01:10
35-35.2 to 62 bits, cont from 61 bits	Khemikal796	Lone Mersenne Hunters	12	2005-12-01 21:35

2009-09-10, 23:38	#45
garo Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 101011010000₂ Posts	Might I suggest 84M? 2M should keep the slow pokes going for a while. Though we know there are LMHers not as polite as you and with almost as much firepower who do like to step on our little toes so there is no guarantee that that 2K will remain open for us. @Uncwilly: chalsall likes to go to 64 bits and everything from 333M to 400M is already up to 64 bits. @chalsall: 100-200M to 64 bits then?

2009-09-13, 01:12	#46
markr "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3×191 Posts	Mainly, I like to see the project progressing, and if I have contributed toward some milestone or other, that's a bonus. So your contributions are appreciated along with everyone else's, chalsall! If there's some exponents below 100M left for the less-resourced, that'd be nice. Otherwise there are still plenty higher ranges. Lower ranges too - I've watched a lot of TF progress in exponents below 10M, and thought about doing some. There are lots of numbers, and these old machines won't last or stay in use forever anyway.

2009-09-17, 11:54	#47
garo Aug 2002 Termonfeckin, IE 5320₈ Posts	Only 80.36-80.46 remains.

2009-09-26, 01:11	#53
markr "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3×191 Posts	Taking 80.40 to 80.42. Only 474 exponents, 80.38 to 80.40, unassigned.

2009-10-01, 22:00	#54
markr "Mark" Feb 2003 Sydney 3·191 Posts	Taking the last lot. None left unassigned below 64 bits.

2009-10-02, 00:34	#55
petrw1 1976 Toyota Corona years forever! "Wayne" Nov 2006 Saskatchewan, Canada 3·5²·71 Posts	It's been a slice... onward and upward...