![]() |
|
|
#67 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×132×19 Posts |
Sieved 2^860+1 for Q=42M..60M on the rational side using 15e (which took about 9.1 million seconds on eight CPUs for 58.83 million relations, 56.00 million unique; 53.4M relations with 51.1M unique was not enough); 87 hours of msieve, to get
Code:
Mon Jan 19 13:47:17 2009 matrix is 5820738 x 5820985 (1669.6 MB) with weight 409551060 (70.36/col) Mon Jan 19 13:47:17 2009 sparse part has weight 379466405 (65.19/col) ... Mon Jan 19 13:47:57 2009 commencing Lanczos iteration (4 threads) Mon Jan 19 13:47:57 2009 memory use: 1783.7 MB Fri Jan 23 01:45:14 2009 lanczos halted after 92054 iterations (dim = 5820734) Fri Jan 23 01:45:28 2009 recovered 35 nontrivial dependencies ... (on the second sqrt) Fri Jan 23 03:27:31 2009 prp96 factor: 269212888053633266896764094842604470698795516716194332265336979146008021202787273766958767916961 Fri Jan 23 03:27:31 2009 prp102 factor: 138776371236300101144144808595934170948601771886820498689521331389066829344376919032939015490766635921 |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
"Nancy"
Aug 2002
Alexandria
2,467 Posts |
Nice split!
Alex |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×132×19 Posts |
It may be of some interest that
Code:
2^923+1 / lcm(2^13+1,2^71+1) = 434284416496884393040841315444206695459788549436182739707934576370088748201819201184526862364134150497353667 * 25319805183489042487156221096767958835909341111097087668817007887186460231678267872101668787950577618516608938546123875314864353811603524007549633 Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2009-02-23 at 23:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
24×593 Posts |
Congratulations to Greg and Bruce who have finished the largest msieve filtering job to date!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Jul 2003
So Cal
2,111 Posts |
Quote:
And for those wondering, the factors areCode:
prp95 factor: 10278473016169511741674978241147093808758455091738490812210128381632640553809934883069084182177 prp174 factor: 148244867657815410685251025382155445432460875370335602150996589909580097524489073313159227345391307390452247708240254482878830828494841709447508662091300316342847949267849729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Nov 2003
1D2416 Posts |
2,865+ C178 = p79.p99 =
3205853408074298683566650869570798974094347365546830062745393897406012552557721 * 322840049452668076280247037005800758274547345385472479309983070175409126454761698489088892852328531 |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Jun 2005
lehigh.edu
210 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
2, 869+ c222 1341253968916020371683276849882955285358373356754247287123270630\ 77028670312366648778721. p136 Batalov+Dodson snfs Lehigh's newest hardware; with an "appalling" collection of seven new first holes set by Serge. -Bruce |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
191616 Posts |
With Jason's software and the sieving resources available to Bruce, 163-digit GNFS is not a hard problem.
Polynomial search with msieve-1.39 with tweaked sieving parameters (first-stage bound 10^25, second-stage 10^23.3, 'third-stage' (NOT murphy_E) 10^-15.5), for a5=1 to 10^5, done by Tom Womack; about 400 CPU-hours over several CPUs. Final polynomial was Code:
# Murphy_E: 7.25e-13 n: 1447459931133685689731819733718362624021387285345472868400340917637201997410510401320440776572040952789115382200319441628654673769479260524464580088278559757354113 skew: 43703886.03 Y0: -33835736602487934973914042254201 Y1: 2382364346739881539 c0: 2175967112101260296531455335523267483587000 c1: -914379503205478241926289080385151264 c2: 44710065394246436846906938222 c3: 107170167718966915876 c4: -23244745130903 c5: 32640 lpbr: 30 lpba: 30 mfbr: 60 mfba: 60 rlambda: 2.6 alambda: 2.6 alim: 80000000 rlim: 80000000 Code:
Mon Aug 31 15:18:16 2009 found 20658831 duplicates and 115307765 unique relations Mon Aug 31 16:39:48 2009 found 6018220 cycles, need 5942516 Mon Aug 31 16:40:50 2009 RelProcTime: 6025 Mon Aug 31 16:40:50 2009 commencing linear algebra Mon Aug 31 16:40:51 2009 read 5942516 cycles Mon Aug 31 16:40:59 2009 cycles contain 15049780 unique relations Mon Aug 31 16:43:09 2009 read 15049780 relations Mon Aug 31 16:43:31 2009 using 20 quadratic characters above 1073741288 Mon Aug 31 16:44:48 2009 building initial matrix Mon Aug 31 16:47:54 2009 memory use: 2161.5 MB Mon Aug 31 16:47:56 2009 read 5942516 cycles Mon Aug 31 16:47:59 2009 matrix is 5942338 x 5942516 (1796.9 MB) with weight 567660531 (95.53/col) Mon Aug 31 16:47:59 2009 sparse part has weight 399736320 (67.27/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:02 2009 filtering completed in 2 passes Mon Aug 31 16:49:03 2009 matrix is 5941976 x 5942154 (1796.9 MB) with weight 567648990 (95.53/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:03 2009 sparse part has weight 399734046 (67.27/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:17 2009 read 5942154 cycles Mon Aug 31 16:49:20 2009 matrix is 5941976 x 5942154 (1796.9 MB) with weight 567648990 (95.53/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:20 2009 sparse part has weight 399734046 (67.27/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:20 2009 saving the first 48 matrix rows for later Mon Aug 31 16:49:22 2009 matrix is 5941928 x 5942154 (1738.0 MB) with weight 452494190 (76.15/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:22 2009 sparse part has weight 396173618 (66.67/col) Mon Aug 31 16:49:22 2009 matrix includes 64 packed rows Mon Aug 31 16:49:22 2009 using block size 65536 for processor cache size 8192 kB Mon Aug 31 16:49:51 2009 commencing Lanczos iteration (4 threads) Mon Aug 31 16:49:51 2009 memory use: 1853.2 MB Wed Sep 2 16:53:25 2009 lanczos halted after 93967 iterations (dim = 5941924) Wed Sep 2 16:53:41 2009 recovered 26 nontrivial dependencies Wed Sep 2 16:53:41 2009 BLanczosTime: 173571 Wed Sep 2 16:53:41 2009 Wed Sep 2 16:53:41 2009 commencing square root phase Wed Sep 2 16:53:41 2009 reading relations for dependency 1 Wed Sep 2 16:53:41 2009 read 2972376 cycles Wed Sep 2 16:53:46 2009 cycles contain 9433105 unique relations Wed Sep 2 16:55:29 2009 read 9433105 relations Wed Sep 2 16:56:15 2009 multiplying 7527218 relations Wed Sep 2 17:34:53 2009 multiply complete, coefficients have about 423.00 million bits Wed Sep 2 17:34:58 2009 initial square root is modulo 38901461 Wed Sep 2 18:55:06 2009 sqrtTime: 7285 Wed Sep 2 18:55:06 2009 prp80 factor: 27330696325754397702721859056296484944945941783920736872107408951551671859754049 Wed Sep 2 18:55:06 2009 prp83 factor: 52960960594688838859111781933077513079102767102893014841306072260677809408420380737 Wed Sep 2 18:55:06 2009 elapsed time 51:54:42 Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2009-09-02 at 21:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
5,881 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2×132×19 Posts |
A slightly smaller (5.2M) matrix took 70 hours on a core2quad.
I happen to have just done some medium-sized SNFS jobs, resulting in ~4M matrices, one on K10/2500 and one on C2/2400. Rerunning the two matrices on the i7: 5+2.298: 112.6ks on four cores of C2/2400, 65.1ks on four cores of i7 5+4.298: 94.7ks on four cores of K10/2500, 65.2ks on four cores of i7 IE the i7 does the job in 60% of the time that the C2/2400 takes, or 70% of the time the K10/2500 takes. In neither case was I running anything else on the machines, and on the i7 I used taskset to ensure that each thread of linear algebra got its own core (rather than sharing a hyperthreaded core) Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2009-09-04 at 14:21 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5+ table | garo | Cunningham Tables | 100 | 2021-01-04 22:36 |
| 7+ table | garo | Cunningham Tables | 86 | 2021-01-04 22:35 |
| 6+ table | garo | Cunningham Tables | 80 | 2021-01-04 22:33 |
| 5- table | garo | Cunningham Tables | 82 | 2020-03-15 21:47 |
| 6- table | garo | Cunningham Tables | 41 | 2016-08-04 04:24 |